Children’s and Adolescents’ Processing of Temporary Syntactic Ambiguity: An Eye Movement Study

Q1 Social Sciences
P. Engelhardt
{"title":"Children’s and Adolescents’ Processing of Temporary Syntactic Ambiguity: An Eye Movement Study","authors":"P. Engelhardt","doi":"10.1155/2014/475315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the eye movements of 24 children and adolescents as they read sentences containing temporary syntactic ambiguities. Prior research suggested that children primarily use grammatical information when making initial parsing decisions, and they tend to disregard semantic and contextual information. On each trial, participants read a garden path sentence (e.g., While the storm blew the boat sat in the shed), and, afterwards, they answered a comprehension question (e.g., Did the storm blow the boat?). The design was 2 × 2 (verb type × ambiguity) repeated measures. Verb type was optionally transitive or reflexive, and sentences were ambiguous or unambiguous. Results showed no differences in first pass reading times at the disambiguating verb (e.g., sat). However, regressions did show a significant interaction. The unambiguous-reflexive condition had approximately half the number of regressions, suggesting less processing difficulty in this condition. Developmentally, we found that adolescents had significantly better comprehension, which seemed to be linked to the increased tendency to regress from the disambiguating word. Findings are consistent with the assumption that the processing architecture is more restricted in children compared to adolescents. In addition, results indicated that variance in ambiguity resolution was associated with interference control but not working memory.","PeriodicalId":9783,"journal":{"name":"Child development research","volume":"139 19 1","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/475315","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child development research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/475315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

This study examined the eye movements of 24 children and adolescents as they read sentences containing temporary syntactic ambiguities. Prior research suggested that children primarily use grammatical information when making initial parsing decisions, and they tend to disregard semantic and contextual information. On each trial, participants read a garden path sentence (e.g., While the storm blew the boat sat in the shed), and, afterwards, they answered a comprehension question (e.g., Did the storm blow the boat?). The design was 2 × 2 (verb type × ambiguity) repeated measures. Verb type was optionally transitive or reflexive, and sentences were ambiguous or unambiguous. Results showed no differences in first pass reading times at the disambiguating verb (e.g., sat). However, regressions did show a significant interaction. The unambiguous-reflexive condition had approximately half the number of regressions, suggesting less processing difficulty in this condition. Developmentally, we found that adolescents had significantly better comprehension, which seemed to be linked to the increased tendency to regress from the disambiguating word. Findings are consistent with the assumption that the processing architecture is more restricted in children compared to adolescents. In addition, results indicated that variance in ambiguity resolution was associated with interference control but not working memory.
儿童青少年对暂时性句法歧义的加工:一项眼动研究
这项研究检查了24名儿童和青少年在阅读含有暂时句法歧义的句子时的眼球运动。先前的研究表明,儿童在做出最初的解析决定时主要使用语法信息,而倾向于忽视语义和上下文信息。在每次试验中,参与者阅读一个花园小径的句子(例如,当暴风雨吹船时,船坐在棚子里),然后,他们回答一个理解问题(例如,风暴吹船了吗?)设计为2 × 2(动词类型×歧义)重复测量。动词类型可选为及物动词或反身动词,句子有歧义或无歧义。结果显示,在消歧义动词(如sat)的第一次阅读时间上没有差异。然而,回归确实显示了显著的相互作用。明确反射条件的回归数约为一半,表明该条件的处理难度较小。从发展的角度来看,我们发现青少年的理解力明显更好,这似乎与从消除歧义的单词中回归的趋势增加有关。研究结果与假设一致,即与青少年相比,儿童的处理结构更受限制。此外,结果表明歧义解决的差异与干扰控制有关,而与工作记忆无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Child development research
Child development research Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Child Development Research is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles as well as review articles in all areas of child development research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信