An empirical investigation of the felicity conditions for the Japanese evidentials -rashii, -sooda, and -yooda

IF 0.3 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Julie Matsubara, Michael Blasingame, E. Smith
{"title":"An empirical investigation of the felicity conditions for the Japanese evidentials -rashii, -sooda, and -yooda","authors":"Julie Matsubara, Michael Blasingame, E. Smith","doi":"10.1163/18773109-00901005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reports on the first detailed experimental investigation of the perception of the felicity of evidential markers in context. We investigated the Japanese evidentials -rashii, -sooda, and -yooda in various discourse environments by manipulating two key variables: (a) whether there was any conjecture required, and (b) whether the information source was accessible firsthand to the speaker. This work provides a baseline against which future studies of other discourse variables can be measured, and our results present some challenges to established conceptions. For example, -rashii was found to be compatible with reportative utterances, building on its traditional categorization as a conjectural evidential. We situate our findings with respect to the typological literature and contemplate how the results may inform semantico-pragmatic theories of evidentiality. We further propose a slight modification to McCready and Ogata (2007) to account for the felicity of bare propositions with indirect information sources.","PeriodicalId":43536,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Pragmatics","volume":"9 1","pages":"155-198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/18773109-00901005","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-00901005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper reports on the first detailed experimental investigation of the perception of the felicity of evidential markers in context. We investigated the Japanese evidentials -rashii, -sooda, and -yooda in various discourse environments by manipulating two key variables: (a) whether there was any conjecture required, and (b) whether the information source was accessible firsthand to the speaker. This work provides a baseline against which future studies of other discourse variables can be measured, and our results present some challenges to established conceptions. For example, -rashii was found to be compatible with reportative utterances, building on its traditional categorization as a conjectural evidential. We situate our findings with respect to the typological literature and contemplate how the results may inform semantico-pragmatic theories of evidentiality. We further propose a slight modification to McCready and Ogata (2007) to account for the felicity of bare propositions with indirect information sources.
日本证据-拉氏、-苏达、-尤达的幸福条件实证研究
本文报道了第一个详细的实验调查感知证据标记的幸福语境。我们调查了日语证据-rashii, -sooda和-yooda在不同的话语环境中,通过操纵两个关键变量:(a)是否需要任何猜测,(b)信息来源是否可以直接获得说话者。这项工作为其他话语变量的未来研究提供了一个基线,我们的结果对既定概念提出了一些挑战。例如,-rashii被发现与报告性话语兼容,基于其作为推测证据的传统分类。我们将我们的发现与类型学文献联系起来,并考虑结果如何为证据性的语义语用理论提供信息。我们进一步建议对McCready和Ogata(2007)进行轻微修改,以解释间接信息源的裸命题的幸福。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Review of Pragmatics
International Review of Pragmatics LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信