The Democratic Implications of npos and the Control Strategy of the State

IF 0.4 Q4 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Changjuan Geng, Lucas Meijs
{"title":"The Democratic Implications of npos and the Control Strategy of the State","authors":"Changjuan Geng, Lucas Meijs","doi":"10.1163/18765149-12341303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Liberal scholars attribute an essential role to nonprofit organizations ( NPO s) in the process of democratization, due to their roles in raising public awareness and supervising the hegemony of the state. Nevertheless, the current literature has yet to pay sufficient attention to the ways in which governments respond to the dynamics of power. As argued in public rational choice theory , the government is a self-benefit maximizing bureaucrat that spares no effort to adopt various strategies aimed at keeping society under control. We have studied this postulation by comparing the two contrasting civil societies of China and the Netherlands. Results from our investigation of campaigning NPO s from China and the Netherlands confirm that states tend to apply a range of strategies (e.g., political restrictions and financial instruments) in order to assimilate NPO s into the developmental planning of the government (e.g., by stimulating the economic functions of NPO s while weakening their democratic functions in intangible ways).","PeriodicalId":41661,"journal":{"name":"China Nonprofit Review","volume":"8 1","pages":"3-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/18765149-12341303","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Nonprofit Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18765149-12341303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Liberal scholars attribute an essential role to nonprofit organizations ( NPO s) in the process of democratization, due to their roles in raising public awareness and supervising the hegemony of the state. Nevertheless, the current literature has yet to pay sufficient attention to the ways in which governments respond to the dynamics of power. As argued in public rational choice theory , the government is a self-benefit maximizing bureaucrat that spares no effort to adopt various strategies aimed at keeping society under control. We have studied this postulation by comparing the two contrasting civil societies of China and the Netherlands. Results from our investigation of campaigning NPO s from China and the Netherlands confirm that states tend to apply a range of strategies (e.g., political restrictions and financial instruments) in order to assimilate NPO s into the developmental planning of the government (e.g., by stimulating the economic functions of NPO s while weakening their democratic functions in intangible ways).
非营利组织的民主意涵与国家的控制策略
自由派学者认为,非营利组织(NPO)在民主化过程中发挥了重要作用,因为它们在提高公众意识和监督国家霸权方面发挥了重要作用。然而,目前的文献尚未对政府应对权力动态的方式给予足够的关注。正如公共理性选择理论所主张的那样,政府是一个自我利益最大化的官僚机构,它不遗余力地采取各种旨在控制社会的策略。我们通过比较中国和荷兰两个截然不同的公民社会来研究这一假设。我们对来自中国和荷兰的非营利组织的调查结果证实,国家倾向于采用一系列策略(例如,政治限制和金融工具),以便将非营利组织吸收到政府的发展规划中(例如,通过刺激非营利组织的经济功能,同时以无形的方式削弱其民主功能)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
China Nonprofit Review
China Nonprofit Review PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
336
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信