Mutiny on the Amistad: The Saga of a Slave Revolt and Its Impact on American Abolition, Law, and Diplomacy by Howard Jones

C. L. Payne
{"title":"Mutiny on the Amistad: The Saga of a Slave Revolt and Its Impact on American Abolition, Law, and Diplomacy by Howard Jones","authors":"C. L. Payne","doi":"10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim070090025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mutiny on the Amistad: The Saga of a Slave Revolt and It's Impact on Amer- ican Abolition, Law, and Diplomacy, By Howard Jones. Oxford: Oxford Uni- versity Press. 1987. Pp.ix, 271. Mutiny On The Amistad, is an account of how a shipload of African cap- tives one day appeared in New York harbor and confronted the American nation with the issue of slavery and the rights of Blacks. The book presents a step-by-step view of the preceeding turmoil among the American government, the Spanish government, the abolitionists who defended the captives, and the southern slaveowners. Chapter one gives a historical perspective of the circumstances which led to the Amistad's appearance in New York harbor in the summer of 1839. The Amistad captives were taken from Africa to Cuba in violation of Spanish law which forbad slave trading, but not slavery within Cuba. Once in Cuba, the slaves were sold to the owners and operators of the Amistad. On July 1, 1839, the captives led by Joseph Cinque, revolted and took control of the ship. They intended to have the ship return them back to Af- rica, however, due to their lack of navigational skills they had to rely on their new captives to sail the ship. The captain by day sailed the ship toward Africa but at night he turned the ship in a northernly direction towards the American coast. After nearly two months of zig-zagging, an American patrol ship seized the Amistad which was anchored off the coast of Long Island, N.Y. What followed was the judicial turmoil which Jones dedicated most of the book to analyze. Chapter two characterizes the effort of the abolitionists to use the Amis- tad case as an emotional arena to debate the issue of slavery. The two Spanish shipowners petitioned the U.S. government to return their property at once. The abolitionists were determined to establish that Black persons, irrespective of color, were human beings and thus were entitled to certain rights. The abolitionists attempted to appeal to the religious and moral ideals of the na- tion. They felt that before emancipation was achieved, they first had to evan- gelize the nation. The Amistad case presented a forum to force the nation to confront the horror of slavery. However strong the abolitionists' effort, they still were not able to curb the strong sentiment of racism even among themselves. Chapter three characterizes the turmoil which President Van Buren's ad- ministration was faced with. The abolitionists pleaded with him not to use executive authority to turn the ship, cargo, and captives over to Spain. The southerners demanded that the U.S. government stay out of Spanish law and turn the captives over to Spain. President Van Buren, thinking of reelection, took a laissez-faire attitude on the issue. His administration feared that whatever stand they took would offend some of their constituents. So they sat back and stayed soft on the issues and hoped that time would let the matter blow over. Chapter four presents the first trial along the road toward ultimately se- curing the release and freedom of the Amistad captives. Their strategy was to petition the court for three separate writs of habeas corpus to secure the re- lease of three young girls who were not involved in the bloody mutiny and thus had no reason to be detained. The abolitionists hoped that if the writs","PeriodicalId":82068,"journal":{"name":"National Black law journal","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Black law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim070090025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Mutiny on the Amistad: The Saga of a Slave Revolt and It's Impact on Amer- ican Abolition, Law, and Diplomacy, By Howard Jones. Oxford: Oxford Uni- versity Press. 1987. Pp.ix, 271. Mutiny On The Amistad, is an account of how a shipload of African cap- tives one day appeared in New York harbor and confronted the American nation with the issue of slavery and the rights of Blacks. The book presents a step-by-step view of the preceeding turmoil among the American government, the Spanish government, the abolitionists who defended the captives, and the southern slaveowners. Chapter one gives a historical perspective of the circumstances which led to the Amistad's appearance in New York harbor in the summer of 1839. The Amistad captives were taken from Africa to Cuba in violation of Spanish law which forbad slave trading, but not slavery within Cuba. Once in Cuba, the slaves were sold to the owners and operators of the Amistad. On July 1, 1839, the captives led by Joseph Cinque, revolted and took control of the ship. They intended to have the ship return them back to Af- rica, however, due to their lack of navigational skills they had to rely on their new captives to sail the ship. The captain by day sailed the ship toward Africa but at night he turned the ship in a northernly direction towards the American coast. After nearly two months of zig-zagging, an American patrol ship seized the Amistad which was anchored off the coast of Long Island, N.Y. What followed was the judicial turmoil which Jones dedicated most of the book to analyze. Chapter two characterizes the effort of the abolitionists to use the Amis- tad case as an emotional arena to debate the issue of slavery. The two Spanish shipowners petitioned the U.S. government to return their property at once. The abolitionists were determined to establish that Black persons, irrespective of color, were human beings and thus were entitled to certain rights. The abolitionists attempted to appeal to the religious and moral ideals of the na- tion. They felt that before emancipation was achieved, they first had to evan- gelize the nation. The Amistad case presented a forum to force the nation to confront the horror of slavery. However strong the abolitionists' effort, they still were not able to curb the strong sentiment of racism even among themselves. Chapter three characterizes the turmoil which President Van Buren's ad- ministration was faced with. The abolitionists pleaded with him not to use executive authority to turn the ship, cargo, and captives over to Spain. The southerners demanded that the U.S. government stay out of Spanish law and turn the captives over to Spain. President Van Buren, thinking of reelection, took a laissez-faire attitude on the issue. His administration feared that whatever stand they took would offend some of their constituents. So they sat back and stayed soft on the issues and hoped that time would let the matter blow over. Chapter four presents the first trial along the road toward ultimately se- curing the release and freedom of the Amistad captives. Their strategy was to petition the court for three separate writs of habeas corpus to secure the re- lease of three young girls who were not involved in the bloody mutiny and thus had no reason to be detained. The abolitionists hoped that if the writs
《阿米斯塔德号上的兵变:一场奴隶起义的传奇及其对美国废奴、法律和外交的影响》,作者:霍华德·琼斯
《阿米斯塔德号上的兵变:一场奴隶起义的传奇及其对美国废奴、法律和外交的影响》,霍华德·琼斯著。牛津:牛津大学出版社。1987。Pp.ix, 271年。《阿米斯塔德号上的兵变》讲述了有一天一船非洲俘虏出现在纽约港,并向美国提出了奴隶制和黑人权利的问题。这本书一步一步地介绍了美国政府、西班牙政府、为俘虏辩护的废奴主义者和南方奴隶主之间的动荡。第一章从历史角度阐述了1839年夏天阿米斯塔德号出现在纽约港的原因。阿米斯塔德俘虏被从非洲带到古巴,这违反了西班牙法律,该法律禁止奴隶贸易,但不禁止古巴境内的奴隶制。一旦进入古巴,这些奴隶就被卖给阿米斯塔德的主人和经营者。1839年7月1日,由约瑟夫·辛克领导的俘虏起义并控制了这艘船。他们打算让船把他们送回非洲,然而,由于他们缺乏航海技能,他们不得不依靠他们的新俘虏来驾驶船只。船长白天把船驶向非洲,但晚上他把船转向北方,驶向美洲海岸。经过近两个月的曲折,一艘美国巡逻舰抓住了停泊在纽约长岛海岸附近的阿米斯塔德号。随之而来的是司法混乱,琼斯用了本书的大部分篇幅来分析这一点。第二章描述了废奴主义者利用艾米斯-泰德案件作为辩论奴隶制问题的情感舞台的努力。这两名西班牙船主请求美国政府立即归还他们的财产。废奴主义者决心确立黑人,不论肤色,都是人,因此有权享有某些权利。废奴主义者试图诉诸于这个国家的宗教和道德理想。他们认为,在实现解放之前,他们首先必须使国家平民化。阿米斯塔德案提供了一个论坛,迫使国家面对奴隶制的恐怖。无论废奴主义者多么努力,他们仍然无法抑制强烈的种族主义情绪,甚至在他们自己内部。第三章描述了范布伦政府所面临的混乱局面。废奴主义者恳求他不要使用行政权力将船只、货物和俘虏移交给西班牙。南方人要求美国政府不干涉西班牙法律,把俘虏交给西班牙。范布伦总统考虑连任,在这个问题上采取了自由放任的态度。他的政府担心,无论他们采取何种立场,都会冒犯一些选民。因此,他们坐下来,对这些问题保持温和态度,希望时间会让这件事过去。第四章是通往最终解救阿米斯塔德俘虏的道路上的第一次审判。他们的策略是向法院申请三个单独的人身保护令,以确保释放三名年轻女孩,她们没有参与血腥的兵变,因此没有理由被拘留。废奴主义者希望,如果令状
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信