Satu Vaara, E. Tikkanen, Olavi Parkkonen, M. Lokki, S. Ripatti, M. Perola, M. Nieminen, J. Sinisalo
{"title":"Genetic Risk Scores Predict Recurrence of Acute Coronary Syndrome","authors":"Satu Vaara, E. Tikkanen, Olavi Parkkonen, M. Lokki, S. Ripatti, M. Perola, M. Nieminen, J. Sinisalo","doi":"10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.115.001271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background—Several clinical risk estimation tools have established their role in the prediction of recurrence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but the value of genetic risk scores (GRSs) remains unclear. We examined how well 2 different GRSs estimate recurrent ACS and whether clinical factors are associated with GRSs. Methods and Results—A cohort of 2090 consecutive patients with ACS who underwent coronary angiography between July 2006 and March 2008 in a single tertiary center was genotyped and prospectively followed up for a median of 5.5 years. We formed 2 partially overlapping GRSs: GRS47 of 47 single-nucleotide polymorphisms with previously reported significant association with coronary artery disease and GRS153 of 153 single-nucleotide polymorphisms with significant or suggestive association with coronary artery disease. GRS47 showed association with recurrent ACS independent of clinical factors (P=0.037; hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–1.36). GRS153 had no association with either recurrent ACS or composite of recurrent ACS or death. Also, GRS47 was associated inversely with smoking and ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction (P=0.004; odds ratio, 0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.08–0.62 and P=0.041; odds ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.13–0.96, respectively). Conclusions—GRSs combined of 47 known coronary artery disease risk single-nucleotide polymorphisms were associated with recurrent ACS after multivariable adjustments in a heterogenic ACS population for the first time. Smoking and ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction had an inverse association with the GRSs. The significance of smoking in relation to genetic coronary artery disease predisposition may merit further evaluation in patients with ACS.","PeriodicalId":48940,"journal":{"name":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Genetics","volume":"9 1","pages":"172–178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.115.001271","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.115.001271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24
Abstract
Background—Several clinical risk estimation tools have established their role in the prediction of recurrence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but the value of genetic risk scores (GRSs) remains unclear. We examined how well 2 different GRSs estimate recurrent ACS and whether clinical factors are associated with GRSs. Methods and Results—A cohort of 2090 consecutive patients with ACS who underwent coronary angiography between July 2006 and March 2008 in a single tertiary center was genotyped and prospectively followed up for a median of 5.5 years. We formed 2 partially overlapping GRSs: GRS47 of 47 single-nucleotide polymorphisms with previously reported significant association with coronary artery disease and GRS153 of 153 single-nucleotide polymorphisms with significant or suggestive association with coronary artery disease. GRS47 showed association with recurrent ACS independent of clinical factors (P=0.037; hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–1.36). GRS153 had no association with either recurrent ACS or composite of recurrent ACS or death. Also, GRS47 was associated inversely with smoking and ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction (P=0.004; odds ratio, 0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.08–0.62 and P=0.041; odds ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.13–0.96, respectively). Conclusions—GRSs combined of 47 known coronary artery disease risk single-nucleotide polymorphisms were associated with recurrent ACS after multivariable adjustments in a heterogenic ACS population for the first time. Smoking and ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction had an inverse association with the GRSs. The significance of smoking in relation to genetic coronary artery disease predisposition may merit further evaluation in patients with ACS.
期刊介绍:
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine considers all types of original research articles, including studies conducted in human subjects, laboratory animals, in vitro, and in silico. Articles may include investigations of: clinical genetics as applied to the diagnosis and management of monogenic or oligogenic cardiovascular disorders; the molecular basis of complex cardiovascular disorders, including genome-wide association studies, exome and genome sequencing-based association studies, coding variant association studies, genetic linkage studies, epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and metagenomics; integration of electronic health record data or patient-generated data with any of the aforementioned approaches, including phenome-wide association studies, or with environmental or lifestyle factors; pharmacogenomics; regulation of gene expression; gene therapy and therapeutic genomic editing; systems biology approaches to the diagnosis and management of cardiovascular disorders; novel methods to perform any of the aforementioned studies; and novel applications of precision medicine. Above all, we seek studies with relevance to human cardiovascular biology and disease. Manuscripts are examined by the editorial staff and usually evaluated by expert reviewers assigned by the editors. Both clinical and basic articles will also be subject to statistical review, when appropriate. Provisional or final acceptance is based on originality, scientific content, and topical balance of the journal. Decisions are communicated by email, generally within six weeks. The editors will not discuss a decision about a manuscript over the phone. All rebuttals must be submitted in writing to the editorial office.