Audiências de conciliação: determinações legais e interação

IF 0.2 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Marise Adriana Mamede Galvão, Anderson Souza da Silva Lanzillo
{"title":"Audiências de conciliação: determinações legais e interação","authors":"Marise Adriana Mamede Galvão, Anderson Souza da Silva Lanzillo","doi":"10.11606/ISSN.2236-4242.V34I1P81-102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is a reflection concerning the interaction in conciliation hearings held in a Civil Forum in the State of Rio Grande do Norte. We discuss some dimensions of those hearings, guided by what defines the legislation (CPC and the Law of Special Courts), observing how the normative regulations influence the linguistic-discursive aspects. Thus, we privilege the evidences of the overall structural organization of the interaction and the lexical choices * Professora doutora da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte – UFRN, Natal, RN, Brasil. ** Professor doutor da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte – UFRN, Natal, RN, Brasil. Linha D’Água, São Paulo, v. 34, n. 01, p. 81-102, jan.-abr. 2021 82 Audiências de conciliação: determinações legais e interação Todo conteúdo da Linha D’Água está sob Licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that permeate the hearings, from the point of view of the Institutional Talk. We followed the Conversation Analysis orientation for the construction of the investigation corpus, consisting of two conciliation hearings, recorded on video and transcribed according to the system adopted by the studies of oral texts. The analysis of the audience data allowed us to recognize some consistency in the interaction, marked by what is institutionally defined, given the compliance with laws and guidelines that are embodied in the linguisticdiscursive level, based on the lexicon identified in this research data.","PeriodicalId":40599,"journal":{"name":"Linha d Agua","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linha d Agua","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/ISSN.2236-4242.V34I1P81-102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study is a reflection concerning the interaction in conciliation hearings held in a Civil Forum in the State of Rio Grande do Norte. We discuss some dimensions of those hearings, guided by what defines the legislation (CPC and the Law of Special Courts), observing how the normative regulations influence the linguistic-discursive aspects. Thus, we privilege the evidences of the overall structural organization of the interaction and the lexical choices * Professora doutora da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte – UFRN, Natal, RN, Brasil. ** Professor doutor da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte – UFRN, Natal, RN, Brasil. Linha D’Água, São Paulo, v. 34, n. 01, p. 81-102, jan.-abr. 2021 82 Audiências de conciliação: determinações legais e interação Todo conteúdo da Linha D’Água está sob Licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that permeate the hearings, from the point of view of the Institutional Talk. We followed the Conversation Analysis orientation for the construction of the investigation corpus, consisting of two conciliation hearings, recorded on video and transcribed according to the system adopted by the studies of oral texts. The analysis of the audience data allowed us to recognize some consistency in the interaction, marked by what is institutionally defined, given the compliance with laws and guidelines that are embodied in the linguisticdiscursive level, based on the lexicon identified in this research data.
调解听证会:法律决定和互动
本研究是对在北巴西格兰德州民事论坛上举行的调解听证会中相互作用的反思。我们以立法(CPC和特别法院法)的定义为指导,讨论了这些听证会的一些方面,观察规范性法规如何影响语言话语方面。因此,我们提供了互动的整体结构组织和词汇选择的证据* prof . dooutora da Universidade Federal do b里约热内卢Grande do Norte - UFRN, Natal, RN, brazil。**巴西北格兰德联邦大学教授-巴西纳塔尔联邦大学。林哈D ' Água, ssci o Paulo, vol . 34, n. 01, p. 81-102, 1月-abr。2021 82 Audiências de concilia o: determinações legais e intera o Todo conteúdo da Linha D ' Água est licensing 知识共享署名-非商业性4.0国际许可协议,从机构谈话的角度来看,渗透到听证会中。我们以对话分析为导向构建调查语料库,包括两次调解听证会,录像并按照口头文本研究采用的系统进行转录。对受众数据的分析使我们认识到互动中的一些一致性,以制度定义为标志,考虑到在语言学话语层面体现的法律和指导方针的遵守,基于本研究数据中确定的词汇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Linha d Agua
Linha d Agua LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信