Opinion Dynamics with Slowly Evolving Zealot Populations

Ashlyn DeGroot, E. Schmidt
{"title":"Opinion Dynamics with Slowly Evolving Zealot Populations","authors":"Ashlyn DeGroot, E. Schmidt","doi":"10.1137/22s1515306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". We introduce and analyze a model for opinion dynamics comprised of nonlinear ODEs. The variables are the proportion of moderates in the population who hold opinion A, the proportion of zealots who hold opinion A, and the proportion of zealots who hold opinion B (not A). The zealots are willing to change their opinion at a much slower rate than the moderates. Our model takes into account such things as the inherent attractiveness of one opinion over the other, the indoctrination of moderates by the zealots, and deradicalization of the zealots by the moderates. A combination of theoretical and numerical analysis shows there are many different types of asymptotic configurations of the population. Many of these correspond to critical points of the system. The most intriguing finding is that if both A and B are roughly equally attractive, and the rate of indoctrination is roughly equal to the rate of deradicalization, then there will be a stable periodic orbit. The dynamics of this orbit show that a precursor to an opinion being dominant is that the proportion of zealots for the opinion must first grow to some critical value. Moreover, when the periodic orbit exists, there are no other solutions which allow for coexistence between the two opinions.","PeriodicalId":93373,"journal":{"name":"SIAM undergraduate research online","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIAM undergraduate research online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1137/22s1515306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. We introduce and analyze a model for opinion dynamics comprised of nonlinear ODEs. The variables are the proportion of moderates in the population who hold opinion A, the proportion of zealots who hold opinion A, and the proportion of zealots who hold opinion B (not A). The zealots are willing to change their opinion at a much slower rate than the moderates. Our model takes into account such things as the inherent attractiveness of one opinion over the other, the indoctrination of moderates by the zealots, and deradicalization of the zealots by the moderates. A combination of theoretical and numerical analysis shows there are many different types of asymptotic configurations of the population. Many of these correspond to critical points of the system. The most intriguing finding is that if both A and B are roughly equally attractive, and the rate of indoctrination is roughly equal to the rate of deradicalization, then there will be a stable periodic orbit. The dynamics of this orbit show that a precursor to an opinion being dominant is that the proportion of zealots for the opinion must first grow to some critical value. Moreover, when the periodic orbit exists, there are no other solutions which allow for coexistence between the two opinions.
与缓慢进化的狂热人群的意见动态
. 介绍并分析了一个由非线性ode组成的意见动态模型。变量是人口中持意见A的温和派的比例,持意见A的狂热者的比例,以及持意见B(不是A)的狂热者的比例。狂热者愿意以比温和派慢得多的速度改变他们的意见。我们的模型考虑了一些因素,比如一种观点相对于另一种观点的内在吸引力,狂热者对温和派的灌输,以及温和派对狂热者的去激进化。理论分析和数值分析相结合表明,总体有许多不同类型的渐近构型。其中许多都对应于系统的临界点。最有趣的发现是,如果A和B的吸引力大致相同,灌输的速度大致等于去极端化的速度,那么就会有一个稳定的周期轨道。这一轨道的动态表明,一种意见占主导地位的前兆是,这种意见的狂热者的比例必须首先增长到某个临界值。此外,当周期轨道存在时,不存在允许两种观点共存的其他解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信