Utilization of Machine Learning to Simulate the Implementation of Instant Runoff Voting

Nicholas J. Joyner
{"title":"Utilization of Machine Learning to Simulate the Implementation of Instant Runoff Voting","authors":"Nicholas J. Joyner","doi":"10.1137/18s016709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In election years when the popular vote winner and Electoral College winner differ, such as in the 2016 presidential election, there tends to be an increase in discussions about alternative voting strategies. Ranked choice voting is a strategy that has been discussed and is currently used in approximately fourteen cities across the United States and in six states for special elections and overseas ballots. Ranked choice voting (RCV), sometimes called Instant Runoff Voting (IRV), is a system of voting in which voters are allowed to rank the candidates. If no candidate wins over fifty percent of the vote, the election automatically goes to another round. The candidate with the least support is eliminated and their votes are redistributed to the voters’ next choice. This process of elimination and redistribution continues until a candidate receives a majority of the vote. In this paper, we use predictive modeling strategies and simulation to investigate the potential implications of employing ranked choice voting in a presidential election using the 2016 presidential election as a case study.","PeriodicalId":93373,"journal":{"name":"SIAM undergraduate research online","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIAM undergraduate research online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1137/18s016709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In election years when the popular vote winner and Electoral College winner differ, such as in the 2016 presidential election, there tends to be an increase in discussions about alternative voting strategies. Ranked choice voting is a strategy that has been discussed and is currently used in approximately fourteen cities across the United States and in six states for special elections and overseas ballots. Ranked choice voting (RCV), sometimes called Instant Runoff Voting (IRV), is a system of voting in which voters are allowed to rank the candidates. If no candidate wins over fifty percent of the vote, the election automatically goes to another round. The candidate with the least support is eliminated and their votes are redistributed to the voters’ next choice. This process of elimination and redistribution continues until a candidate receives a majority of the vote. In this paper, we use predictive modeling strategies and simulation to investigate the potential implications of employing ranked choice voting in a presidential election using the 2016 presidential election as a case study.
利用机器学习模拟即时决选投票的实现
在普选获胜者和选举人团获胜者不同的选举年,比如2016年总统大选,关于替代投票策略的讨论往往会增加。排名选择投票是一种已经讨论过的策略,目前在美国大约14个城市和6个州用于特别选举和海外投票。排名选择投票(RCV),有时也被称为即时决选投票(IRV),是一种允许选民对候选人进行排名的投票制度。如果没有候选人赢得超过50%的选票,选举将自动进入下一轮。支持率最低的候选人被淘汰,他们的选票被重新分配给选民的下一个选择。这一淘汰和重新分配的过程一直持续到候选人获得多数选票为止。在本文中,我们使用预测建模策略和模拟来研究在总统选举中采用排名选择投票的潜在影响,并以2016年总统选举为例进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信