Influence of Error in Estimating Anisotropy Parameters on VTI Depth Imaging

IF 1 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
S. Y. M. Alashloo, D. Ghosh, Y. Bashir, W. Ismail
{"title":"Influence of Error in Estimating Anisotropy Parameters on VTI Depth Imaging","authors":"S. Y. M. Alashloo, D. Ghosh, Y. Bashir, W. Ismail","doi":"10.1155/2016/2848750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thin layers in sedimentary rocks lead to seismic anisotropy which makes the wave velocity dependent on the propagation angle. This aspect causes errors in seismic imaging such as mispositioning of migrated events if anisotropy is not accounted for. One of the challenging issues in seismic imaging is the estimation of anisotropy parameters which usually has error due to dependency on several elements such as sparse data acquisition and erroneous data with low signal-to-noise ratio. In this study, an isotropic and anelliptic VTI fast marching eikonal solvers are employed to obtain seismic travel times required for Kirchhoff depth migration algorithm. The algorithm solely uses compressional wave. Another objective is to study the influence of anisotropic errors on the imaging. Comparing the isotropic and VTI travel times demonstrates a considerable lateral difference of wavefronts. After Kirchhoff imaging with true anisotropy, as a reference, and with a model including error, results show that the VTI algorithm with error in anisotropic models produces images with minor mispositioning which is considerable for isotropic one specifically in deeper parts. Furthermore, over- or underestimating anisotropy parameters up to 30 percent are acceptable for imaging and beyond that cause considerable mispositioning.","PeriodicalId":45602,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geophysics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2016/2848750","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2848750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Thin layers in sedimentary rocks lead to seismic anisotropy which makes the wave velocity dependent on the propagation angle. This aspect causes errors in seismic imaging such as mispositioning of migrated events if anisotropy is not accounted for. One of the challenging issues in seismic imaging is the estimation of anisotropy parameters which usually has error due to dependency on several elements such as sparse data acquisition and erroneous data with low signal-to-noise ratio. In this study, an isotropic and anelliptic VTI fast marching eikonal solvers are employed to obtain seismic travel times required for Kirchhoff depth migration algorithm. The algorithm solely uses compressional wave. Another objective is to study the influence of anisotropic errors on the imaging. Comparing the isotropic and VTI travel times demonstrates a considerable lateral difference of wavefronts. After Kirchhoff imaging with true anisotropy, as a reference, and with a model including error, results show that the VTI algorithm with error in anisotropic models produces images with minor mispositioning which is considerable for isotropic one specifically in deeper parts. Furthermore, over- or underestimating anisotropy parameters up to 30 percent are acceptable for imaging and beyond that cause considerable mispositioning.
各向异性参数估计误差对VTI深度成像的影响
沉积岩中的薄层导致地震各向异性,这使得波速依赖于传播角。如果不考虑各向异性,这方面会导致地震成像中的错误,例如偏移事件的错误定位。地震成像中具有挑战性的问题之一是各向异性参数的估计,由于依赖于稀疏的数据采集和低信噪比的错误数据等因素,各向异性参数的估计通常存在误差。本研究采用各向同性和非椭圆的VTI快速行进方程求解Kirchhoff深度偏移算法所需的地震行程时间。该算法完全利用了纵波。另一个目的是研究各向异性误差对成像的影响。各向同性和VTI传播时间的比较显示了相当大的波前横向差异。以真实各向异性的Kirchhoff成像为参考,在包含误差的模型下,结果表明,各向异性模型中存在误差的VTI算法得到的图像定位误差较小,特别是在较深部位的各向同性图像定位误差较大。此外,高估或低估各向异性参数高达30%是可接受的成像和超过会导致相当大的错位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Geophysics
International Journal of Geophysics GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Geophysics is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles as well as review articles in all areas of theoretical, observational, applied, and computational geophysics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信