Reducing the incidence of Obstetric Sphincter Injuries using a hands-on technique: an interventional quality improvement project

O. B. Rasmussen, Annika Yding, Jacob Anh Ø, Charlotte Sander Andersen, J. Boris
{"title":"Reducing the incidence of Obstetric Sphincter Injuries using a hands-on technique: an interventional quality improvement project","authors":"O. B. Rasmussen, Annika Yding, Jacob Anh Ø, Charlotte Sander Andersen, J. Boris","doi":"10.1136/bmjquality.u217936.w7106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A main concern for women giving birth is the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries. In our department the incidence of sphincter injuries was around 8 % among vaginally delivering first time mothers. We aimed to halve the incidence to 4 % or less. A prospective interventional program was instituted. We implemented a hands-on technique with four elements in a bundle of care together with a certification process for all staff on the delivery ward. The incidence of episiotomies served as a balancing indicator. The adherence to three of the four elements of the care bundle rose significantly while the all-or-nothing indicator leveled around 80 %. The median number of deliveries between cases with a sphincter injury increased from 9.5 in the baseline period to 20 during the intervention period. This corresponded with a reduction in the incidence from 7.0 % to 3.4 %. The rate of episiotomy remained low at 8.4 % in this group. By implementing the hands-on technique, we halved the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Our data suggest that further improvement may be anticipated. The study has demonstrated how implementation of a hands-on technique can be carried out within a quality improvement framework with rapid and sustainable results.","PeriodicalId":91218,"journal":{"name":"BMJ quality improvement reports","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjquality.u217936.w7106","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ quality improvement reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u217936.w7106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

A main concern for women giving birth is the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries. In our department the incidence of sphincter injuries was around 8 % among vaginally delivering first time mothers. We aimed to halve the incidence to 4 % or less. A prospective interventional program was instituted. We implemented a hands-on technique with four elements in a bundle of care together with a certification process for all staff on the delivery ward. The incidence of episiotomies served as a balancing indicator. The adherence to three of the four elements of the care bundle rose significantly while the all-or-nothing indicator leveled around 80 %. The median number of deliveries between cases with a sphincter injury increased from 9.5 in the baseline period to 20 during the intervention period. This corresponded with a reduction in the incidence from 7.0 % to 3.4 %. The rate of episiotomy remained low at 8.4 % in this group. By implementing the hands-on technique, we halved the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Our data suggest that further improvement may be anticipated. The study has demonstrated how implementation of a hands-on technique can be carried out within a quality improvement framework with rapid and sustainable results.
使用动手技术减少产科括约肌损伤的发生率:一项介入质量改进项目
分娩妇女的一个主要问题是产科肛门括约肌损伤的风险。在我科首次顺产的产妇中,括约肌损伤的发生率约为8%。我们的目标是把发病率减半到4%或更低。一项前瞻性干预计划被制定。我们在一系列护理中实施了四个要素的实践技术,并对分娩病房的所有工作人员进行了认证。外阴切开术的发生率是一个平衡指标。对护理包四个要素中的三个要素的依从性显著提高,而全有或全无指标的水平约为80%。括约肌损伤病例之间的分娩中位数从基线期的9.5次增加到干预期的20次。这与发病率从7.0%下降到3.4%相对应。该组的会阴切开术率仍然很低,为8.4%。通过实施动手技术,我们将产科肛门括约肌损伤的风险降低了一半。我们的数据表明,进一步的改善是可以预期的。该研究展示了如何在质量改进框架内实施实践技术,并取得快速和可持续的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信