National Collegiate Athletic Association Athletic Departments’ Mental Health Screening Practices: Who, What, When, and How

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Margaret M. Drew, T. Petrie, Tess M. Palmateer
{"title":"National Collegiate Athletic Association Athletic Departments’ Mental Health Screening Practices: Who, What, When, and How","authors":"Margaret M. Drew, T. Petrie, Tess M. Palmateer","doi":"10.1123/jcsp.2021-0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"College student athletes face unique, sport-related stressors that may lead to, or exacerbate, mental health (MH) concerns and symptoms. Although the National Collegiate Athletic Association has identified MH screening as a best practice, minimal data exist regarding contemporary screening practices. We explored National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I (DI), Division II (DII), and Division III (DIII) athletic departments’ current MH screening practices (N = 264). Compared with DII/DIII (53%), a greater percentage of Division I (89%) conducted formal MH screening. At DII/DIII institutions, athletic trainers were more likely to both administer and review screeners than any other sports medicine professional; sport psychologists primarily oversaw these tasks at DI schools. DI, compared with DII/DIII, institutions were more likely to have had a student athlete attempt suicide (62% vs. 40%) and participate in inpatient treatment (69% vs. 43%). There is a clear need for the National Collegiate Athletic Association to continue to promote policies that support MH screening and to create mechanisms in which it can monitor institutional involvement.","PeriodicalId":46614,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jcsp.2021-0036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

College student athletes face unique, sport-related stressors that may lead to, or exacerbate, mental health (MH) concerns and symptoms. Although the National Collegiate Athletic Association has identified MH screening as a best practice, minimal data exist regarding contemporary screening practices. We explored National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I (DI), Division II (DII), and Division III (DIII) athletic departments’ current MH screening practices (N = 264). Compared with DII/DIII (53%), a greater percentage of Division I (89%) conducted formal MH screening. At DII/DIII institutions, athletic trainers were more likely to both administer and review screeners than any other sports medicine professional; sport psychologists primarily oversaw these tasks at DI schools. DI, compared with DII/DIII, institutions were more likely to have had a student athlete attempt suicide (62% vs. 40%) and participate in inpatient treatment (69% vs. 43%). There is a clear need for the National Collegiate Athletic Association to continue to promote policies that support MH screening and to create mechanisms in which it can monitor institutional involvement.
全国大学体育协会体育部门的心理健康筛查实践:谁,什么,何时,以及如何
大学生运动员面临着独特的、与运动相关的压力源,这些压力源可能导致或加剧心理健康(MH)问题和症状。尽管美国大学体育协会已将MH筛查确定为最佳做法,但关于当代筛查做法的数据很少。我们探讨了全国大学体育协会一级(DI)、二级(DII)和三级(DIII)体育部门目前的MH筛查做法(N = 264)。与DII/DIII相比(53%),I区进行正式MH筛查的比例更高(89%)。在DII/DIII机构,运动教练比任何其他运动医学专业人员更有可能管理和审查筛选者;运动心理学家主要监督DI学校的这些任务。与DII/DIII相比,DI更有可能让学生运动员企图自杀(62%对40%),并参与住院治疗(69%对43%)。全国大学体育协会显然需要继续推动支持MH筛查的政策,并建立能够监督机构参与的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
10.50%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信