José Alonso Hernández León, J. F. Montes, Oscar Ulises Reynoso González, Iván Alejandro Caldera Zamora, Santiago Salcedo Orozco
{"title":"Resiliencia. Diferencias entre estudiantes universitarios y jóvenes trabajadores","authors":"José Alonso Hernández León, J. F. Montes, Oscar Ulises Reynoso González, Iván Alejandro Caldera Zamora, Santiago Salcedo Orozco","doi":"10.11144/JAVERIANACALI.PPSI18-1.RDEU","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolObjetivo. Comparar los niveles de resiliencia entre jovenes universitarios y jovenes trabajadores, e identificarposibles relaciones de dicha variable con la edad de los participantes. Metodo. La muestra, de tipo incidental,estuvo conformada por 188 jovenes, cuya edad oscilaba entre los 18 y los 27 anos. Al momento del estudio,138 cursaban una carrera profesional universitaria y 50 eran trabajadores. Para medir la variable del estudiose utilizo la Escala de Resiliencia traducida y adaptada al espanol. Resultados. El principal hallazgo es que losjovenes universitarios obtienen puntajes significativamente mayores que los trabajadores, tanto en el total de la prueba de resiliencia (t(186) = -3.98, p = 0.000, d = 0.65) como en las dos dimensiones que la componen,Competencia personal (t(186) = -4.45, p = 0.000, d = 0.73) y Aceptacion de si mismo y de la vida (t(186) =-2.23, p = 0.026, d = 0.36). Conclusion. Un mayor nivel de estudios podria considerarse un factor protectorante la adversidad, al relacionarse con una mayor resiliencia. EnglishObjective. To compare the levels of resilience between university and young workers, as well as between men and women, and to identify possible relationships of this variable with the age of the participants. Method. This was a correlational study with transversal-correlational design. The sample was incidental and was made up of 188 people between 18 to 27 years old. At the time of the study, 138 of the participants were pursuing an undergraduate major in the university and 50 of them were workers. To measure the study variable, the Resilience Scale was used in its translated and adapted version to Spanish. Results. The main finding is that university students obtain significantly higher scores than workers, both in the total resilience test (t(186) = -3.98, p = 0.000, d = 0.65) and in the two dimensions that compose it, Personal competence (t(186) = -4.45, p = 0.000, d = 0.73) and Acceptance of self and life (t(186) = -2.23, p = 0.026, d = 0.36). Conclusion. The general conclusion indicates that a higher level of education could be considered a protective factor against adversity, as it is related to greater resilience.","PeriodicalId":31223,"journal":{"name":"Pensamiento Psicologico","volume":"18 1","pages":"21-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pensamiento Psicologico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11144/JAVERIANACALI.PPSI18-1.RDEU","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
espanolObjetivo. Comparar los niveles de resiliencia entre jovenes universitarios y jovenes trabajadores, e identificarposibles relaciones de dicha variable con la edad de los participantes. Metodo. La muestra, de tipo incidental,estuvo conformada por 188 jovenes, cuya edad oscilaba entre los 18 y los 27 anos. Al momento del estudio,138 cursaban una carrera profesional universitaria y 50 eran trabajadores. Para medir la variable del estudiose utilizo la Escala de Resiliencia traducida y adaptada al espanol. Resultados. El principal hallazgo es que losjovenes universitarios obtienen puntajes significativamente mayores que los trabajadores, tanto en el total de la prueba de resiliencia (t(186) = -3.98, p = 0.000, d = 0.65) como en las dos dimensiones que la componen,Competencia personal (t(186) = -4.45, p = 0.000, d = 0.73) y Aceptacion de si mismo y de la vida (t(186) =-2.23, p = 0.026, d = 0.36). Conclusion. Un mayor nivel de estudios podria considerarse un factor protectorante la adversidad, al relacionarse con una mayor resiliencia. EnglishObjective. To compare the levels of resilience between university and young workers, as well as between men and women, and to identify possible relationships of this variable with the age of the participants. Method. This was a correlational study with transversal-correlational design. The sample was incidental and was made up of 188 people between 18 to 27 years old. At the time of the study, 138 of the participants were pursuing an undergraduate major in the university and 50 of them were workers. To measure the study variable, the Resilience Scale was used in its translated and adapted version to Spanish. Results. The main finding is that university students obtain significantly higher scores than workers, both in the total resilience test (t(186) = -3.98, p = 0.000, d = 0.65) and in the two dimensions that compose it, Personal competence (t(186) = -4.45, p = 0.000, d = 0.73) and Acceptance of self and life (t(186) = -2.23, p = 0.026, d = 0.36). Conclusion. The general conclusion indicates that a higher level of education could be considered a protective factor against adversity, as it is related to greater resilience.
espanolObjetivo。比较年轻大学生和年轻工人的弹性水平,并确定该变量与参与者年龄的可能关系。方法。本研究的目的是确定青少年青少年的心理健康状况,并确定青少年青少年的心理健康状况。在进行研究时,138名学生在大学学习,50名是工人。为了测量研究变量,我使用了翻译和适应西班牙语的弹性量表。结果。主要的发现是,losjovenes大学生获得分数明显高于工人,在总能力测试(t (186) = -3.98, p = 0.000, d = 0.65)组成的两个维度,个人竞争(t (186) = -4.45, p = 0.000, d = 0.73)和Aceptacion自己和人生(t (186) = -2.23, p = 0.026 d = 0.36)。结论。更高的教育水平可以被认为是抵御逆境的一个因素,因为它与更强的韧性有关。EnglishObjective。比较大学和青年工作者之间以及男女之间的复原力水平,并确定这一变量与参与者年龄之间可能的关系。Method。这是一项具有跨相关设计的相关研究。附带的was The sample and was made up of people between 18 27年old 188。在进行研究时,138名参与者在大学攻读研究生专业,其中50人是工人。为了测量研究变量,采用了弹性量表的英文翻译和改编版本。结果。The main finding is that大学学生获得的总得分than工作者,both in The test (t(186) = -3.98文化展,p = 0.000, d = 0.65) and in The two that compose it人员、事故专职维度(t (186) = -4.45, p = 0.000, d = 0.73) and Acceptance of self and life (t (186) = -2.23, p = 0.026 d = 0.36)。结论。总体结论表明,较高的教育水平可被视为抵御逆境的一种保护性因素,因为它与增强复原力有关。