The long shadows cast by the field: violence, trauma, and the ethnographic researcher

IF 1.3 Q2 GEOGRAPHY
Stephen Taylor
{"title":"The long shadows cast by the field: violence, trauma, and the ethnographic researcher","authors":"Stephen Taylor","doi":"10.11143/fennia.84792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As more geographers utilise ethnographic methods to explore pressing contemporary issues such as abandonment, precarity, and resilience, they enter into research environments often defined by social marginality and violence. There are emotional and psychological risks associated with embedded research in such contexts, however these challenges have largely been ignored in existing methodological literatures. A frank debate is needed about the emotional and psychological burden that ethnographic research can exact upon lone researchers and how these burdens interface with researcher identity and positionality. Drawing on a reflexive analysis of the author’s experience of fieldwork in South Africa, this paper highlights the emotional consequences of conducting ethnographic research with marginal groups in dangerous contexts. It specifically examines the ripple effect of exposure to traumatic events that culminated in the author’s diagnosis with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In so doing, the paper draws attention to the acute emotional and psychological consequences of ethnographic research, while also challenging prevalent professional attitudes within the neoliberal university that promote the downplaying or silencing of such repercussions. The paper concludes with a series of suggestions for how (early career) researchers, our discipline, and institutions might better promote and realise an ethic of collective care for field researchers.","PeriodicalId":45082,"journal":{"name":"Fennia-International Journal of Geography","volume":"197 1","pages":"183-199"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fennia-International Journal of Geography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11143/fennia.84792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

As more geographers utilise ethnographic methods to explore pressing contemporary issues such as abandonment, precarity, and resilience, they enter into research environments often defined by social marginality and violence. There are emotional and psychological risks associated with embedded research in such contexts, however these challenges have largely been ignored in existing methodological literatures. A frank debate is needed about the emotional and psychological burden that ethnographic research can exact upon lone researchers and how these burdens interface with researcher identity and positionality. Drawing on a reflexive analysis of the author’s experience of fieldwork in South Africa, this paper highlights the emotional consequences of conducting ethnographic research with marginal groups in dangerous contexts. It specifically examines the ripple effect of exposure to traumatic events that culminated in the author’s diagnosis with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In so doing, the paper draws attention to the acute emotional and psychological consequences of ethnographic research, while also challenging prevalent professional attitudes within the neoliberal university that promote the downplaying or silencing of such repercussions. The paper concludes with a series of suggestions for how (early career) researchers, our discipline, and institutions might better promote and realise an ethic of collective care for field researchers.
这个领域投下的长长的阴影:暴力、创伤和人种学研究者
随着越来越多的地理学家利用民族志方法来探索遗弃、不稳定和恢复力等紧迫的当代问题,他们进入了通常由社会边缘化和暴力定义的研究环境。在这种背景下,与嵌入式研究相关的情感和心理风险,然而这些挑战在现有的方法学文献中很大程度上被忽视了。关于民族志研究可能强加给孤独研究者的情感和心理负担,以及这些负担如何与研究者的身份和立场相关联,需要进行坦率的辩论。通过对作者在南非实地工作经历的反思分析,本文强调了在危险环境中与边缘群体进行民族志研究的情感后果。它特别检查了暴露于创伤事件的连锁反应,最终导致作者被诊断为创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)。在这样做的过程中,论文引起了人们对民族志研究的尖锐情感和心理后果的关注,同时也挑战了新自由主义大学中普遍存在的专业态度,这种态度促进了对这种影响的淡化或沉默。本文最后提出了一系列建议,以指导(早期职业)研究者、我们的学科和机构如何更好地促进和实现对野外研究者的集体关怀伦理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信