The accuracy of Influenza A (H1N1) "swine flu" laboratory testing: A systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy.

S. White, T. Schultz, C. Tufanaru
{"title":"The accuracy of Influenza A (H1N1) \"swine flu\" laboratory testing: A systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy.","authors":"S. White, T. Schultz, C. Tufanaru","doi":"10.11124/JBISRIR-2011-330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Review question/objective \nThe aim of this systematic review is to comprehensively search the available literature and to synthesise the best available evidence to determine the diagnostic accuracy of currently available laboratory tests for swine flu (H1N1), using viral culture as a reference test. \n \nInclusion Criteria \nTypes of participants \nStudies will be considered for inclusion in the review if the participants are human patients exhibiting influenza-like symptoms who have been tested for swine flu (H1N1) using both a diagnostic and reference test. There will be no exclusion based on age, gender or co-morbidities, but subgroup analysis will be conducted if there is sufficient data and if appropriate. \n \nPhenomenon of interest \nThe phenomenon of interest is the correct identification of H1N1 infection. This review will consider studies that compare the accuracy of laboratory tests aiming to diagnose swine flu (H1N1) in patients presenting with influenza-like symptoms, in comparison to viral culture. \n \nOutcome measures \nThe accuracy of diagnostic tests will be determined by how well the test correctly gives positive results for patients with confirmed swine flu (H1N1) and negative results for patients without, as determined by viral culture. It is anticipated that data will be presented as raw test results or sensitivities and specificities of the test compared with viral culture will be presented. Other statistics to elaborate on diagnostic test accuracy may include likelihood ratios and/or predictive values.","PeriodicalId":91723,"journal":{"name":"JBI library of systematic reviews","volume":"9 64 Suppl 1","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI library of systematic reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2011-330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Review question/objective The aim of this systematic review is to comprehensively search the available literature and to synthesise the best available evidence to determine the diagnostic accuracy of currently available laboratory tests for swine flu (H1N1), using viral culture as a reference test. Inclusion Criteria Types of participants Studies will be considered for inclusion in the review if the participants are human patients exhibiting influenza-like symptoms who have been tested for swine flu (H1N1) using both a diagnostic and reference test. There will be no exclusion based on age, gender or co-morbidities, but subgroup analysis will be conducted if there is sufficient data and if appropriate. Phenomenon of interest The phenomenon of interest is the correct identification of H1N1 infection. This review will consider studies that compare the accuracy of laboratory tests aiming to diagnose swine flu (H1N1) in patients presenting with influenza-like symptoms, in comparison to viral culture. Outcome measures The accuracy of diagnostic tests will be determined by how well the test correctly gives positive results for patients with confirmed swine flu (H1N1) and negative results for patients without, as determined by viral culture. It is anticipated that data will be presented as raw test results or sensitivities and specificities of the test compared with viral culture will be presented. Other statistics to elaborate on diagnostic test accuracy may include likelihood ratios and/or predictive values.
甲型H1N1流感的准确性“猪流感”实验室测试:诊断测试准确性的系统回顾。
本系统综述的目的是全面检索现有文献并综合现有的最佳证据,以病毒培养作为参考检测,确定目前可用的猪流感(H1N1)实验室检测的诊断准确性。纳入标准参与者类型如果参与者是表现出流感样症状的人类患者,并且使用诊断和参考测试对猪流感(H1N1)进行了检测,则研究将被考虑纳入本综述。没有基于年龄、性别或合并症的排除,但如果有足够的数据和适当的情况下,将进行亚组分析。感兴趣现象是对H1N1感染的正确识别。这篇综述将考虑比较旨在诊断出现流感样症状患者的猪流感(H1N1)的实验室检测与病毒培养的准确性的研究。结果测量诊断测试的准确性将取决于该测试在多大程度上正确地为确诊的猪流感(H1N1)患者提供阳性结果,而为未确诊的患者提供阴性结果,这是由病毒培养确定的。预计数据将以原始测试结果的形式呈现,或者将展示该测试与病毒培养相比较的敏感性和特异性。详细说明诊断试验准确性的其他统计可能包括似然比和/或预测值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信