Measurement Accuracy of Non-invasively obtained Central Systolic Blood Pressure and Central Pulse Pressure- A Systematic Review.

Hao-min Cheng, D. Lang, Alan Pearson, S. Worthley, C. Tufanaru
{"title":"Measurement Accuracy of Non-invasively obtained Central Systolic Blood Pressure and Central Pulse Pressure- A Systematic Review.","authors":"Hao-min Cheng, D. Lang, Alan Pearson, S. Worthley, C. Tufanaru","doi":"10.11124/JBISRIR-2011-414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Review Objective \nTo synthesise the best available research evidence on the accuracy of current non-invasive measurement methods for central systolic blood pressure and central pulse pressure. \n \nReview Question \nWhat is the accuracy of current non-invasive measurement methods for central systolic blood pressure and central pulse pressure, compared with invasive measurement techniques? \n \nInclusion criteria \nTypes of Participants \nThis review will consider all studies of adult patients (18+ years old) regardless of clinical diagnosis, co-morbidities, treatments, who have been receiving measurement(s) of central SBP and/or central PP both invasively and non-invasively on the same subjects. \n \nTypes of Interventions/Phenomena of Interest \nStudies will be considered for inclusion if the focus of the study is an examination of the accuracy of non-invasive measurement methods using applanation tonometry for central systolic blood pressure and central pulse pressure non-invasive measurement of central BP. Studies will be considered if the non-invasive central SBP and PP measurements have been compared with reference to invasively obtained values. \n \nTypes of Comparator \nInvasive central aortic BP Measurement by a fluid-filled system and/or external pressure transducer. \n \nTypes of Outcome Measures \nThis review will consider studies that include the following types of outcome measures: means of differences between the paired measurements of a non-invasive and invasive technique, standard deviation of differences between paired measurements of a non-invasive and invasive technique, correlation coefficients of the paired measurements of a non-invasive and invasive technique, and any other measures for measurement agreement.","PeriodicalId":91723,"journal":{"name":"JBI library of systematic reviews","volume":"9 32 Suppl 1","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI library of systematic reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2011-414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Review Objective To synthesise the best available research evidence on the accuracy of current non-invasive measurement methods for central systolic blood pressure and central pulse pressure. Review Question What is the accuracy of current non-invasive measurement methods for central systolic blood pressure and central pulse pressure, compared with invasive measurement techniques? Inclusion criteria Types of Participants This review will consider all studies of adult patients (18+ years old) regardless of clinical diagnosis, co-morbidities, treatments, who have been receiving measurement(s) of central SBP and/or central PP both invasively and non-invasively on the same subjects. Types of Interventions/Phenomena of Interest Studies will be considered for inclusion if the focus of the study is an examination of the accuracy of non-invasive measurement methods using applanation tonometry for central systolic blood pressure and central pulse pressure non-invasive measurement of central BP. Studies will be considered if the non-invasive central SBP and PP measurements have been compared with reference to invasively obtained values. Types of Comparator Invasive central aortic BP Measurement by a fluid-filled system and/or external pressure transducer. Types of Outcome Measures This review will consider studies that include the following types of outcome measures: means of differences between the paired measurements of a non-invasive and invasive technique, standard deviation of differences between paired measurements of a non-invasive and invasive technique, correlation coefficients of the paired measurements of a non-invasive and invasive technique, and any other measures for measurement agreement.
无创中心收缩压和中心脉压测量精度的系统评价。
目的对目前无创中心收缩压和脉压测量方法的准确性进行综合研究。与有创测量技术相比,目前无创中心收缩压和中心脉压测量方法的准确性如何?纳入标准参与者类型本综述将考虑所有成人患者(18岁以上)的研究,无论其临床诊断、合并症、治疗方法如何,这些患者在同一受试者上接受了有创和无创的中央收缩压和/或中央PP测量。如果研究的重点是检查非侵入性测量方法的准确性,将考虑纳入干预类型/感兴趣的现象研究,该方法使用平压式血压计测量中心收缩压和中心脉压无创测量中心BP。如果将无创中心收缩压和PP测量值与有创测量值进行比较,将考虑进行研究。采用充液系统和/或外部压力传感器测量有创主动脉中央血压。本综述将考虑包括以下类型结果测量的研究:非侵入性和侵入性技术成对测量之间的差异均值,非侵入性和侵入性技术成对测量之间差异的标准差,非侵入性和侵入性技术成对测量的相关系数,以及测量一致性的任何其他测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信