A systematic review of the effectiveness of Evidence Based Practice (EBP) programs for allied health professionals.

J. Dizon, L. Lizarondo
{"title":"A systematic review of the effectiveness of Evidence Based Practice (EBP) programs for allied health professionals.","authors":"J. Dizon, L. Lizarondo","doi":"10.11124/JBISRIR-2010-850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Review Objectives: The objective of this review is to find, a ssess and synthesize the evidence on EBP programs in enhancing the EBP knowledge, skills and attitudes of allied health practitioners. Review questions: What is the effectiveness of using EBP programs for allied health practitioners in improving the EBP knowledge, skills and attitudes Inclusion criteria: Types of participants: This review will include as participants allied health practitioners (physiotherapists, occupational therapists etc) who participated in any EBP educational program or part of an EBP program (formulating clinical questions, searching the literature, critical appraisal skills program etc). Types of interventions: The intervention of interest in this review is any EBP training program defined as any formal program facilitating the search and use of evidence in practice. The contents (lectures only or lectures with actual demonstrations and practice), length (hours, days, weeks) and manner of delivery (face to face, face to face with supplementary materials etc) of the program may vary in each of the studies to be included as there is no standard EBP training program. Types of Outcome: The main outcomes measured are the EBP domains of knowledge, skills, attitudes and behaviour as a result of participating in the EBP program or a component of it. Specific measures may include but not limited to the use of the adapted Fresno questionnaire (22) to assess knowledge, skills and attitudes to EBP. The adapted Fresno question has good psychometric properties and is especially fitting novice rehabilitation professionals undergoing EBP training.","PeriodicalId":91723,"journal":{"name":"JBI library of systematic reviews","volume":"8 8 Suppl 1","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI library of systematic reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2010-850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Review Objectives: The objective of this review is to find, a ssess and synthesize the evidence on EBP programs in enhancing the EBP knowledge, skills and attitudes of allied health practitioners. Review questions: What is the effectiveness of using EBP programs for allied health practitioners in improving the EBP knowledge, skills and attitudes Inclusion criteria: Types of participants: This review will include as participants allied health practitioners (physiotherapists, occupational therapists etc) who participated in any EBP educational program or part of an EBP program (formulating clinical questions, searching the literature, critical appraisal skills program etc). Types of interventions: The intervention of interest in this review is any EBP training program defined as any formal program facilitating the search and use of evidence in practice. The contents (lectures only or lectures with actual demonstrations and practice), length (hours, days, weeks) and manner of delivery (face to face, face to face with supplementary materials etc) of the program may vary in each of the studies to be included as there is no standard EBP training program. Types of Outcome: The main outcomes measured are the EBP domains of knowledge, skills, attitudes and behaviour as a result of participating in the EBP program or a component of it. Specific measures may include but not limited to the use of the adapted Fresno questionnaire (22) to assess knowledge, skills and attitudes to EBP. The adapted Fresno question has good psychometric properties and is especially fitting novice rehabilitation professionals undergoing EBP training.
基于证据的实践(EBP)程序的有效性的系统审查,为专职卫生专业人员。
综述目的:本综述的目的是寻找、评估和综合有关EBP项目在提高专职医疗从业者的EBP知识、技能和态度方面的证据。回顾问题:联合医疗从业者使用EBP项目在提高EBP知识、技能和态度方面的有效性是什么?纳入标准:参与者类型:本综述将包括参加任何EBP教育项目或部分EBP项目(制定临床问题、检索文献、批判性评估技能项目等)的联合医疗从业者(物理治疗师、职业治疗师等)作为参与者。干预措施类型:本综述中关注的干预措施是任何EBP培训计划,定义为任何有助于在实践中寻找和使用证据的正式计划。由于没有标准的EBP培训计划,课程的内容(讲座或实际演示和练习的讲座),长度(小时,天,周)和交付方式(面对面,面对面的补充材料等)可能在每个学习中有所不同。结果类型:测量的主要结果是参与EBP计划或其组成部分的知识,技能,态度和行为的EBP领域。具体措施可能包括但不限于使用经改编的弗雷斯诺问卷(22)来评估对EBP的知识、技能和态度。修正弗雷斯诺问题具有良好的心理测量性质,特别适合接受EBP训练的康复专业新手。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信