The effectiveness of physical restraints in reducing falls among adults in acute care hospitals and nursing homes: a systematic review.

T. Sze, Chow Yeow Leng, Serena Koh Siew Lin
{"title":"The effectiveness of physical restraints in reducing falls among adults in acute care hospitals and nursing homes: a systematic review.","authors":"T. Sze, Chow Yeow Leng, Serena Koh Siew Lin","doi":"10.11124/01938924-201008341-00013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND Physical restraint was introduced as the primary measure to maintain patient safety in preventing falls. However, physical restraints may lead to complications such as functional loss, immobility, delirium, pressure sore, and even falls or injuries. Despite all these negative effects and many alternatives that are available, physical restraint is still commonly used in hospitals and nursing homes. Hence, it is crucial to understand the effectiveness of physical restraints in protecting adult patients from falling. OBJECTIVE The overall objective was to examine the effectiveness of physical restraints in reducing falls among adults in acute care hospitals and nursing homes. INCLUSION CRITERIA This review considered quantitative designs, including randomised controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, cohort studies, case control studies and case series/reports.The participants of this review were male and female adult patients aged 18 years or over who are on authorized physical restraints in acute care hospitals and nursing homes.This review focused on studies that investigated physical restraint as an intervention for reducing falls among adults in acute care hospitals and nursing homes.The outcomes of interest were the number of individuals receiving restraints who fall, or the rate or number of falls in acute hospitals and nursing homes. SEARCH STRATEGY A three-step search strategy was utilised in this review. An initial limited search of MEDLINE and CINAHL was undertaken, followed by a second search using all identified keywords and index terms across all included databases. Thirdly, the reference list of all identified reports and articles was searched for additional studies. All searches were limited to English Language studies and there was no limit in the timeframe. ASSESSMENT OF METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY The quality of the included studies was subjected to assessment by two independent reviewers using the standardised critical appraisal tools from the Joanna-Briggs Institute from the JBI-MAStARI (Joanna Briggs Institute-Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument). DATA EXTRACTION Data was extracted from included papers using the standardised extraction tool from the JBI MASTARI. DATA SYNTHESIS Due to the heterogeneous nature of the study methods, the findings of this review are presented in a narrative summary. RESULTS Nine studies were included in the review. The majority of the findings showed that physical restraints were not associated with the reduction in falls and decreased restraint use did not contribute to more falls. CONCLUSION From the overall results, physical restraints are not effective in reducing falls or injuries among adults in acute care hospitals and nursing homes.National standards and application guides for physical restraints are recommended. The use of physical restraints should be assessed by trained staff based on individualised need and consideration of patient's autonomy and integrity. The awareness of appropriate physical restraint usage should be enhanced among the healthcare professionals.Large multicentre research to determine the risk and benefit ratio of physical restraints and to examine the effectiveness of alternative measures, different number of bedrails, intermittent restraint use and restraint reduction programs are needed respectively.","PeriodicalId":91723,"journal":{"name":"JBI library of systematic reviews","volume":"10 5 1","pages":"307-351"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI library of systematic reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/01938924-201008341-00013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

BACKGROUND Physical restraint was introduced as the primary measure to maintain patient safety in preventing falls. However, physical restraints may lead to complications such as functional loss, immobility, delirium, pressure sore, and even falls or injuries. Despite all these negative effects and many alternatives that are available, physical restraint is still commonly used in hospitals and nursing homes. Hence, it is crucial to understand the effectiveness of physical restraints in protecting adult patients from falling. OBJECTIVE The overall objective was to examine the effectiveness of physical restraints in reducing falls among adults in acute care hospitals and nursing homes. INCLUSION CRITERIA This review considered quantitative designs, including randomised controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, cohort studies, case control studies and case series/reports.The participants of this review were male and female adult patients aged 18 years or over who are on authorized physical restraints in acute care hospitals and nursing homes.This review focused on studies that investigated physical restraint as an intervention for reducing falls among adults in acute care hospitals and nursing homes.The outcomes of interest were the number of individuals receiving restraints who fall, or the rate or number of falls in acute hospitals and nursing homes. SEARCH STRATEGY A three-step search strategy was utilised in this review. An initial limited search of MEDLINE and CINAHL was undertaken, followed by a second search using all identified keywords and index terms across all included databases. Thirdly, the reference list of all identified reports and articles was searched for additional studies. All searches were limited to English Language studies and there was no limit in the timeframe. ASSESSMENT OF METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY The quality of the included studies was subjected to assessment by two independent reviewers using the standardised critical appraisal tools from the Joanna-Briggs Institute from the JBI-MAStARI (Joanna Briggs Institute-Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument). DATA EXTRACTION Data was extracted from included papers using the standardised extraction tool from the JBI MASTARI. DATA SYNTHESIS Due to the heterogeneous nature of the study methods, the findings of this review are presented in a narrative summary. RESULTS Nine studies were included in the review. The majority of the findings showed that physical restraints were not associated with the reduction in falls and decreased restraint use did not contribute to more falls. CONCLUSION From the overall results, physical restraints are not effective in reducing falls or injuries among adults in acute care hospitals and nursing homes.National standards and application guides for physical restraints are recommended. The use of physical restraints should be assessed by trained staff based on individualised need and consideration of patient's autonomy and integrity. The awareness of appropriate physical restraint usage should be enhanced among the healthcare professionals.Large multicentre research to determine the risk and benefit ratio of physical restraints and to examine the effectiveness of alternative measures, different number of bedrails, intermittent restraint use and restraint reduction programs are needed respectively.
物理约束在减少跌倒在急症护理医院和养老院的成年人的有效性:一个系统的审查。
背景:在预防跌倒中,物理约束被引入作为维护患者安全的主要措施。然而,身体约束可能导致并发症,如功能丧失、行动不便、精神错乱、压疮,甚至跌倒或受伤。尽管有所有这些负面影响和许多可用的替代方法,医院和疗养院仍然普遍使用身体约束。因此,了解物理约束在保护成年患者不跌倒方面的有效性是至关重要的。目的:总体目的是研究物理约束在减少急诊医院和养老院成人跌倒方面的有效性。纳入标准本综述考虑定量设计,包括随机对照试验、准实验研究、队列研究、病例对照研究和病例系列/报告。本综述的参与者是18岁或以上的男性和女性成年患者,他们在急症护理医院和疗养院接受授权的身体约束。这篇综述的重点是研究身体约束作为一种干预措施,以减少在急症护理医院和养老院的成年人跌倒。感兴趣的结果是接受限制的个人跌倒的人数,或在急症医院和疗养院跌倒的比率或次数。检索策略本综述采用三步检索策略。首先对MEDLINE和CINAHL进行有限的搜索,然后在所有纳入的数据库中使用所有确定的关键字和索引术语进行第二次搜索。第三,检索所有确定的报告和文章的参考文献列表以查找其他研究。所有的搜索都局限于英语语言学习,没有时间限制。方法学质量评估纳入研究的质量由两名独立审稿人使用来自JBI-MAStARI (Joanna Briggs Institute- meta - analysis OF Statistics ASSESSMENT and Review Instrument)的乔安娜-布里格斯研究所的标准化关键评估工具进行评估。数据提取使用JBI MASTARI的标准化提取工具从纳入的论文中提取数据。由于研究方法的异质性,本综述的研究结果以叙述性摘要的形式呈现。结果纳入9项研究。大多数研究结果表明,身体约束与跌倒的减少无关,减少约束的使用也不会导致更多的跌倒。结论从总体结果来看,在急症护理医院和疗养院,身体约束在减少成人跌倒或伤害方面效果不佳。推荐国家标准和物理约束应用指南。身体约束的使用应由训练有素的工作人员根据个性化需求和考虑患者的自主性和完整性进行评估。应提高卫生保健专业人员使用适当身体约束的意识。需要进行大型多中心研究,以确定物理约束的风险和效益比,并检查替代措施、不同数量的床栏、间歇性约束使用和减少约束方案的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信