COMPARISON OF MINIMAL MEDIA AND INOCULUM CONCENTRATION TO DECREASE THE LYSINE GROWTH ASSAY RESPONSE TIME OF AN ESCHERICHIA COLI LYSINE AUXOTROPH MUTANT

X. LI, A.M. ERICKSON, S.C. RICKE
{"title":"COMPARISON OF MINIMAL MEDIA AND INOCULUM CONCENTRATION TO DECREASE THE LYSINE GROWTH ASSAY RESPONSE TIME OF AN ESCHERICHIA COLI LYSINE AUXOTROPH MUTANT","authors":"X. LI,&nbsp;A.M. ERICKSON,&nbsp;S.C. RICKE","doi":"10.1111/j.1745-4581.1999.tb00399.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Abstract </b> <i>Microbiological assays involving an</i> Escherichia coli <i>lysine auxotroph have been developed previously for the estimation of lysine bioavailability. To facilitate routine use of an auxotrophic</i> E. coli <i>lysine mutant for a microbial assay, our objectives in this study were to improve the assay with respect to shortening the assay time via increasing inoculum levels, and examine two different minimal media, a minimal salts medium (M9) and a more extensively supplemented minimal medium (DM). The maximum optical density (MOD) response of the</i> E. coli <i>in M9 medium was significantly (p &lt; 0.05) lower than the MOD in the DM medium. However, the time to reach MOD in M9 medium was significantly (p &lt; 0.05) shortened when compared to the time in the DM medium. The total assay time was also significantly shortened from a mean time 13.98 h to 8.19 h by using higher inoculum levels. The results from the study indicated that the</i> E. coli <i>lysine auxotroph bioassay time is shortened by cultivation of the assay bacteria in a more minimal medium and utilization of a more concentrated inocula.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":50067,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rapid Methods and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"7 4","pages":"279-290"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1745-4581.1999.tb00399.x","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rapid Methods and Automation in Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1745-4581.1999.tb00399.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Abstract Microbiological assays involving an Escherichia coli lysine auxotroph have been developed previously for the estimation of lysine bioavailability. To facilitate routine use of an auxotrophic E. coli lysine mutant for a microbial assay, our objectives in this study were to improve the assay with respect to shortening the assay time via increasing inoculum levels, and examine two different minimal media, a minimal salts medium (M9) and a more extensively supplemented minimal medium (DM). The maximum optical density (MOD) response of the E. coli in M9 medium was significantly (p < 0.05) lower than the MOD in the DM medium. However, the time to reach MOD in M9 medium was significantly (p < 0.05) shortened when compared to the time in the DM medium. The total assay time was also significantly shortened from a mean time 13.98 h to 8.19 h by using higher inoculum levels. The results from the study indicated that the E. coli lysine auxotroph bioassay time is shortened by cultivation of the assay bacteria in a more minimal medium and utilization of a more concentrated inocula.

最小培养基和接种量对降低赖氨酸营养不良突变体赖氨酸生长试验响应时间的比较
涉及大肠杆菌赖氨酸营养不良菌的微生物学分析已经开发用于赖氨酸生物利用度的估计。为了便于常规使用营养不良的大肠杆菌赖氨酸突变体进行微生物试验,我们在本研究中的目标是通过增加接种量来改进试验,缩短试验时间,并检查两种不同的最小培养基,最小盐培养基(M9)和更广泛补充的最小培养基(DM)。大肠杆菌在M9培养基中的最大光密度(MOD)响应显著(p <0.05),低于DM培养基中的MOD。而在M9培养基中达到MOD所需时间显著(p <0.05),较DM培养基缩短。在较高的接种量下,总检测时间由平均13.98 h显著缩短至8.19 h。研究结果表明,通过在更小的培养基中培养实验菌和使用更浓缩的接种剂,可以缩短大肠杆菌赖氨酸营养不良菌的生物测定时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Rapid Methods and Automation in Microbiology
Journal of Rapid Methods and Automation in Microbiology 生物-生物工程与应用微生物
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信