COMPARISON OF TWO RAPID METHODS FOR THE DETECTION OF LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES WITH A STANDARD PROCEDURE IN NATURALLY CONTAMINATED ENVIRONMENTS OF RAW POULTRY PROCESSING

E. CHASSEIGNAUX, Y. MICHEL, M.-T. TOQUIN, G. ERMEL, G. SALVAT, P. COLIN
{"title":"COMPARISON OF TWO RAPID METHODS FOR THE DETECTION OF LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES WITH A STANDARD PROCEDURE IN NATURALLY CONTAMINATED ENVIRONMENTS OF RAW POULTRY PROCESSING","authors":"E. CHASSEIGNAUX,&nbsp;Y. MICHEL,&nbsp;M.-T. TOQUIN,&nbsp;G. ERMEL,&nbsp;G. SALVAT,&nbsp;P. COLIN","doi":"10.1111/j.1745-4581.1999.tb00384.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Abstract </b> <i>Two rapid methods (the VIDAS test, from bioMérieux and the Gen-Probe test, from AccuPROBE) were compared with a standard procedure (AFNOR V08-055) for the detection of</i> L. monocytogenes <i>in the environment of naturally contaminated raw poultry processing. Both methods were first tested with their given protocols. But as they are more adapted to food sampling than to environmental ones, these protocols were adapted. After adaptation, the results showed that these two tests performed equally well compared to the classical method.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":50067,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rapid Methods and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"7 3","pages":"147-153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1745-4581.1999.tb00384.x","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rapid Methods and Automation in Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1745-4581.1999.tb00384.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract Two rapid methods (the VIDAS test, from bioMérieux and the Gen-Probe test, from AccuPROBE) were compared with a standard procedure (AFNOR V08-055) for the detection of L. monocytogenes in the environment of naturally contaminated raw poultry processing. Both methods were first tested with their given protocols. But as they are more adapted to food sampling than to environmental ones, these protocols were adapted. After adaptation, the results showed that these two tests performed equally well compared to the classical method.

生禽加工自然污染环境中标准程序快速检测单核细胞增生李斯特菌的两种方法比较
摘要:比较了两种快速检测方法(biomrieux公司的VIDAS法和AccuPROBE公司的Gen-Probe法)与标准方法(AFNOR V08-055)在天然污染的生禽加工环境中单核增生乳杆菌的检测效果。这两种方法都首先按照给定的协议进行了测试。但由于它们更适应食物采样而不是环境采样,所以这些协议被调整了。调整后的结果表明,这两种方法与经典方法相比具有相同的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Rapid Methods and Automation in Microbiology
Journal of Rapid Methods and Automation in Microbiology 生物-生物工程与应用微生物
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信