COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR PROCESSING LITTER AND AIR FILTER MATRICES FROM POULTRY HOUSES TO OPTIMIZE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION DETECTION OF SALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM
{"title":"COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR PROCESSING LITTER AND AIR FILTER MATRICES FROM POULTRY HOUSES TO OPTIMIZE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION DETECTION OF SALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM","authors":"Y.M. KWON, C.L. WOODWARD, J. PEÑA, D.E. CORRIER, S.D. PILLAI, S.C. RICKE","doi":"10.1111/j.1745-4581.1999.tb00379.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Abstract </b> <i>An integrated effort to reduce the occurrence of</i> Salmonella <i>in poultry products should include the control of</i> Salmonella <i>in poultry production in early stages, which requires an efficient monitoring of</i> Salmonella <i>spp. in poultry houses. Studies were conducted to evaluate the potential advantages of using air samples as an alternative to litter samples for PCR detection of</i> Salmonella <i>spp. from poultry houses. The air filter and litter samples from a poultry house were spiked with a culture of</i> Salmonella typhimurium. <i>The intact samples and the DNA extracted from the samples were used for amplification of Salmonella-specific DNA using hns gene specific primers. The</i> ***hns <i>gene was more effectively amplified with filter samples than litter samples when the intact sample was used as template. When extracted DNA was used, however, there was no difference between the two samples in their intensities of PCR products as visualized on an agarose gel. The dilution of the matrices from both sampling methods greatly increased the amplification efficiency, indicating that it was the background matrices that hindered the PCR amplification. The results in this study suggest that air filter sampling may be a labor-saving alternative to litter sampling, which can be used to increase the sensitivity of PCR detection of</i> Salmonella <i>spp. without prior sample processing.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":50067,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rapid Methods and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"7 2","pages":"103-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1745-4581.1999.tb00379.x","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rapid Methods and Automation in Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1745-4581.1999.tb00379.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Abstract
Abstract An integrated effort to reduce the occurrence of Salmonella in poultry products should include the control of Salmonella in poultry production in early stages, which requires an efficient monitoring of Salmonella spp. in poultry houses. Studies were conducted to evaluate the potential advantages of using air samples as an alternative to litter samples for PCR detection of Salmonella spp. from poultry houses. The air filter and litter samples from a poultry house were spiked with a culture of Salmonella typhimurium. The intact samples and the DNA extracted from the samples were used for amplification of Salmonella-specific DNA using hns gene specific primers. The ***hns gene was more effectively amplified with filter samples than litter samples when the intact sample was used as template. When extracted DNA was used, however, there was no difference between the two samples in their intensities of PCR products as visualized on an agarose gel. The dilution of the matrices from both sampling methods greatly increased the amplification efficiency, indicating that it was the background matrices that hindered the PCR amplification. The results in this study suggest that air filter sampling may be a labor-saving alternative to litter sampling, which can be used to increase the sensitivity of PCR detection of Salmonella spp. without prior sample processing.