Can we reduce routine blood ordering in spinal surgery

V. Kouritas, S. Graham, Gautam Marwah, S. Papastefanou
{"title":"Can we reduce routine blood ordering in spinal surgery","authors":"V. Kouritas, S. Graham, Gautam Marwah, S. Papastefanou","doi":"10.1111/J.1778-428X.2011.01148.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY \n \nSpinal reconstruction can be associated with major blood loss; because of the non existence of ordering guidelines, blood products are ordered preoperatively in excessive quantities. The aim of our study was to investigate the efficiency of our ordering routine. \n \n \n \nThe records of 205 spinal surgery patients, over a period of 3 years were reviewed. The crossmatched to transfused (C-T) ratio was calculated for each pathology group and the safe number of units transfused was determined. \n \n \n \nA total of 929 units were crossmatched, whereas 84 patients required transfusion. In all, 404 units were not used (C-T ratio = 1.8). The greatest number of unused but cross matched units was observed in painful back surgery (C-T ratio = 3.9, P < 0.01 vs. other pathologies). For all the other pathology groups (scoliosis, tumor and fracture) fewer units can be ordered, except in neuromuscular scoliosis group (6 units used on average for each case). For spinal fusion, artificial disc replacement or simple discectomy, a group and save routine is adequate. \n \n \n \nIn conclusion, less blood can be ordered for spinal surgery, except for cases of neuromuscular scoliosis. The blood units crossmatched for painful back surgery, were more than actually needed. With technological advancement historical blood crossmatching policies may need re-evaluation.","PeriodicalId":90375,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion alternatives in transfusion medicine : TATM","volume":"11 1","pages":"138-142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/J.1778-428X.2011.01148.X","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion alternatives in transfusion medicine : TATM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1778-428X.2011.01148.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

SUMMARY Spinal reconstruction can be associated with major blood loss; because of the non existence of ordering guidelines, blood products are ordered preoperatively in excessive quantities. The aim of our study was to investigate the efficiency of our ordering routine. The records of 205 spinal surgery patients, over a period of 3 years were reviewed. The crossmatched to transfused (C-T) ratio was calculated for each pathology group and the safe number of units transfused was determined. A total of 929 units were crossmatched, whereas 84 patients required transfusion. In all, 404 units were not used (C-T ratio = 1.8). The greatest number of unused but cross matched units was observed in painful back surgery (C-T ratio = 3.9, P < 0.01 vs. other pathologies). For all the other pathology groups (scoliosis, tumor and fracture) fewer units can be ordered, except in neuromuscular scoliosis group (6 units used on average for each case). For spinal fusion, artificial disc replacement or simple discectomy, a group and save routine is adequate. In conclusion, less blood can be ordered for spinal surgery, except for cases of neuromuscular scoliosis. The blood units crossmatched for painful back surgery, were more than actually needed. With technological advancement historical blood crossmatching policies may need re-evaluation.
我们能在脊柱手术中减少常规抽血吗
脊柱重建可能与大量失血有关;由于没有订购指南,术前订购的血液制品数量过多。我们研究的目的是调查我们的点餐程序的效率。本文回顾了205例脊柱手术患者3年来的记录。计算各病理组的输血交叉匹配(C-T)比,确定安全输血单位数。共有929个单位交叉匹配,而84名患者需要输血。共有404个单位未使用(C-T比= 1.8)。背部疼痛手术中未使用但交叉匹配的单位最多(C-T比= 3.9,与其他病理相比P < 0.01)。对于所有其他病理组(脊柱侧凸、肿瘤和骨折),除了神经肌肉侧凸组(平均每个病例使用6个单位)外,可以订购较少的单位。对于脊柱融合术、人工椎间盘置换术或单纯的椎间盘切除术,一组和保存常规就足够了。总之,除了神经肌肉性脊柱侧凸的病例外,脊柱手术可以少用血。为痛苦的背部手术交叉匹配的血液单位比实际需要的要多。随着技术的进步,历史上的血液交叉配型政策可能需要重新评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信