Current Information on the Infectious Risks of Allogeneic Blood Transfusion

A. Kitchen, J. Barbara
{"title":"Current Information on the Infectious Risks of Allogeneic Blood Transfusion","authors":"A. Kitchen, J. Barbara","doi":"10.1111/J.1778-428X.2008.00112.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY \n \n \nThe safety of allogeneic blood and blood products in relation to infection risk is paramount, even though absolute safety is an ideal that clearly cannot be attained. In countries with developed healthcare systems and with effective and well-managed national transfusion services, any residual infection risk is generally much lower than the risk of non-infectious adverse events. The number of infectious agents known to be transmitted by transfusion is not insignificant, but at the same time only a proportion of these present a significant universal threat. It is therefore important to understand and attempt to quantify the residual infectious risks associated with transfusion. These risks generally fall into two categories: the risk of infection because of the failure to identify infection in a donation from a recently infected donor and the risk of infection from a ‘new’ infectious agent or from one that donations are not routinely screened for. Both of these scenarios are ‘real’ in the sense that these are the threats faced every day by transfusion services. The mitigation of such threats is by ensuring that there are effective donor screening and deferral procedures in place, that the screening performed is carried out to the highest possible standards in terms of sensitivity and reliability, and finally that the transfusion service actively monitors ‘new’ or emerging infectious threats so that action can be taken if the safety of the blood supply is likely to be compromised, as well as maintaining hemovigilance of adverse events in recipients of transfusions.","PeriodicalId":90375,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion alternatives in transfusion medicine : TATM","volume":"10 1","pages":"102-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/J.1778-428X.2008.00112.X","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion alternatives in transfusion medicine : TATM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1778-428X.2008.00112.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

SUMMARY The safety of allogeneic blood and blood products in relation to infection risk is paramount, even though absolute safety is an ideal that clearly cannot be attained. In countries with developed healthcare systems and with effective and well-managed national transfusion services, any residual infection risk is generally much lower than the risk of non-infectious adverse events. The number of infectious agents known to be transmitted by transfusion is not insignificant, but at the same time only a proportion of these present a significant universal threat. It is therefore important to understand and attempt to quantify the residual infectious risks associated with transfusion. These risks generally fall into two categories: the risk of infection because of the failure to identify infection in a donation from a recently infected donor and the risk of infection from a ‘new’ infectious agent or from one that donations are not routinely screened for. Both of these scenarios are ‘real’ in the sense that these are the threats faced every day by transfusion services. The mitigation of such threats is by ensuring that there are effective donor screening and deferral procedures in place, that the screening performed is carried out to the highest possible standards in terms of sensitivity and reliability, and finally that the transfusion service actively monitors ‘new’ or emerging infectious threats so that action can be taken if the safety of the blood supply is likely to be compromised, as well as maintaining hemovigilance of adverse events in recipients of transfusions.
异基因输血感染风险的最新信息
与感染风险相关的同种异体血液和血液制品的安全性是至关重要的,尽管绝对安全显然是不可能实现的理想。在卫生保健系统发达、国家输血服务有效且管理良好的国家,任何残留感染风险通常远低于非传染性不良事件的风险。已知通过输血传播的传染原的数量并非微不足道,但与此同时,其中只有一部分构成重大的普遍威胁。因此,了解并尝试量化与输血相关的剩余感染风险是很重要的。这些风险通常分为两类:由于无法识别最近感染的捐赠者捐赠的感染而造成的感染风险,以及来自“新”感染源或捐赠未常规筛查的感染源的感染风险。这两种情况都是“真实的”,因为它们是输血服务每天面临的威胁。减轻这类威胁的办法是,确保有有效的供体筛查和延迟程序,确保所进行的筛查在敏感性和可靠性方面达到尽可能高的标准,最后,输血服务部门积极监测"新"或新出现的传染性威胁,以便在血液供应的安全可能受到损害时采取行动。以及对输血受者的不良事件保持血液警惕性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信