M. Basora, M. Colomina, V. Moral, J. Llau, M. Vila, L. Durán, S. Silva, C. Sánchez
{"title":"Descriptive study of perioperative transfusion practices in Spanish hospitals","authors":"M. Basora, M. Colomina, V. Moral, J. Llau, M. Vila, L. Durán, S. Silva, C. Sánchez","doi":"10.1111/J.1778-428X.2008.00093.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY \n \n \nIn order to identify opportunities to enhance blood-sparing strategies, we studied blood-transfusion practices in patients undergoing scheduled major surgery in Spain. This prospective, multicenter epidemiological study involved 20 Spanish hospitals. We recorded the pre- and postoperative hemoglobin concentrations, the estimated and calculated blood loss, the number of patients transfused and the blood-sparing techniques used. A total of 359 patients from 18 centers were included in the analysis. Mean preoperative hemoglobin concentration was 13.7 ± 1.6 g/dL. In 29% of the patients, preoperative hemoglobin concentration was lower than 13 g/dL. All surgeries combined, mean estimated blood loss was 845 ± 659 mL and mean calculated blood loss 1722 ± 1021 mL. The percentage of patients transfused with allogeneic blood was 28.4% altogether and ranged from 47.2% in cardiac surgery patients to 4.5% in plastic-maxillofacial surgery patients. Blood-sparing techniques were used only in 70 patients (19.4%). For a large percentage patients who underwent scheduled major surgery, blood transfusion was needed and perioperative blood loss was underestimated. Blood-sparing techniques were underused in non-orthopedic surgery, despite the fact that sufficient time was available to plan appropriate blood-sparing measures.","PeriodicalId":90375,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion alternatives in transfusion medicine : TATM","volume":"10 1","pages":"9-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/J.1778-428X.2008.00093.X","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion alternatives in transfusion medicine : TATM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1778-428X.2008.00093.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Abstract
SUMMARY
In order to identify opportunities to enhance blood-sparing strategies, we studied blood-transfusion practices in patients undergoing scheduled major surgery in Spain. This prospective, multicenter epidemiological study involved 20 Spanish hospitals. We recorded the pre- and postoperative hemoglobin concentrations, the estimated and calculated blood loss, the number of patients transfused and the blood-sparing techniques used. A total of 359 patients from 18 centers were included in the analysis. Mean preoperative hemoglobin concentration was 13.7 ± 1.6 g/dL. In 29% of the patients, preoperative hemoglobin concentration was lower than 13 g/dL. All surgeries combined, mean estimated blood loss was 845 ± 659 mL and mean calculated blood loss 1722 ± 1021 mL. The percentage of patients transfused with allogeneic blood was 28.4% altogether and ranged from 47.2% in cardiac surgery patients to 4.5% in plastic-maxillofacial surgery patients. Blood-sparing techniques were used only in 70 patients (19.4%). For a large percentage patients who underwent scheduled major surgery, blood transfusion was needed and perioperative blood loss was underestimated. Blood-sparing techniques were underused in non-orthopedic surgery, despite the fact that sufficient time was available to plan appropriate blood-sparing measures.