Carry-over effects of nestling physical condition predict first-year survival of a critically endangered migratory parrot

IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
L. T. Bussolini, R. Crates, A. Herrod, M. J. L. Magrath, S. Troy, D. Stojanovic
{"title":"Carry-over effects of nestling physical condition predict first-year survival of a critically endangered migratory parrot","authors":"L. T. Bussolini,&nbsp;R. Crates,&nbsp;A. Herrod,&nbsp;M. J. L. Magrath,&nbsp;S. Troy,&nbsp;D. Stojanovic","doi":"10.1111/acv.12878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Conservation breeding programs are an increasingly important tool to help supplement declining wild populations, but captive-bred animals generally do not survive well post-release. Early life in captivity has the potential to influence growth and development, with impacts carrying over to affect survival. Understanding carry-over effects of captivity and consequences on survival is critically important for conservation efforts globally but remains poorly understood. We examined the relationship between early-life environment, physical condition, and juvenile survival of wild and captive-bred critically endangered orange-bellied parrots (<i>Neophema chrysogaster</i>). Using nestling growth models, we calculated a body condition index for 1,039 wild and captive-bred orange-bellied parrots hatched over six breeding seasons. Nestling body condition varied with year, provenance, and brood position. Wild nestlings had consistently higher body condition than captive-bred nestlings, and first-hatched nestlings were typically heavier than later hatched siblings. We then investigated first-year survival for 298 wild-born and captive-bred released parrots in the wild. Overall, first-year survival was 27.5%, and individual body condition was more influential than provenance in predicting survival. Our findings could be used to aid the selection of individuals for release that have the best prospects of surviving in the wild. This study addresses important questions about the post-release fitness of captive-bred animals, and our metric of assessing physical condition provides a straightforward tool for other conservation breeding programs to adapt management techniques to improve survival outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50786,"journal":{"name":"Animal Conservation","volume":"27 1","pages":"78-85"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acv.12878","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acv.12878","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conservation breeding programs are an increasingly important tool to help supplement declining wild populations, but captive-bred animals generally do not survive well post-release. Early life in captivity has the potential to influence growth and development, with impacts carrying over to affect survival. Understanding carry-over effects of captivity and consequences on survival is critically important for conservation efforts globally but remains poorly understood. We examined the relationship between early-life environment, physical condition, and juvenile survival of wild and captive-bred critically endangered orange-bellied parrots (Neophema chrysogaster). Using nestling growth models, we calculated a body condition index for 1,039 wild and captive-bred orange-bellied parrots hatched over six breeding seasons. Nestling body condition varied with year, provenance, and brood position. Wild nestlings had consistently higher body condition than captive-bred nestlings, and first-hatched nestlings were typically heavier than later hatched siblings. We then investigated first-year survival for 298 wild-born and captive-bred released parrots in the wild. Overall, first-year survival was 27.5%, and individual body condition was more influential than provenance in predicting survival. Our findings could be used to aid the selection of individuals for release that have the best prospects of surviving in the wild. This study addresses important questions about the post-release fitness of captive-bred animals, and our metric of assessing physical condition provides a straightforward tool for other conservation breeding programs to adapt management techniques to improve survival outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

雏鸟身体状况的延续效应可预测极度濒危候鸟第一年的存活率
保护性繁殖计划是一种日益重要的工具,可帮助补充不断减少的野生种群,但人工饲养的动物在放归后通常存活率不高。圈养动物的早期生活可能会影响其生长和发育,进而影响其存活率。了解圈养的延续效应及其对生存的影响对全球的保护工作至关重要,但人们对这一问题的了解仍然很少。我们研究了野生和人工饲养的极度濒危橙腹鹦鹉(Neophema chrysogaster)的早期生活环境、身体状况和幼鸟存活率之间的关系。利用雏鸟生长模型,我们计算了六个繁殖季节孵化的 1039 只野生和人工饲养的橙腹鹦鹉的身体状况指数。雏鸟的身体状况随年份、产地和育雏位置而变化。野生雏鸟的身体状况始终高于人工饲养的雏鸟,而且初孵雏鸟通常比后孵雏鸟更重。然后,我们调查了 298 只野外出生和人工饲养放归的鹦鹉的第一年存活率。总体而言,第一年的存活率为 27.5%,在预测存活率方面,个体的身体状况比产地更有影响力。我们的研究结果可用于帮助选择最有可能在野外存活的放归个体。这项研究解决了圈养动物放归后适应性的重要问题,我们评估身体状况的方法为其他保护性繁殖项目提供了一个直接的工具,以调整管理技术,提高存活率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animal Conservation
Animal Conservation 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Animal Conservation provides a forum for rapid publication of novel, peer-reviewed research into the conservation of animal species and their habitats. The focus is on rigorous quantitative studies of an empirical or theoretical nature, which may relate to populations, species or communities and their conservation. We encourage the submission of single-species papers that have clear broader implications for conservation of other species or systems. A central theme is to publish important new ideas of broad interest and with findings that advance the scientific basis of conservation. Subjects covered include population biology, epidemiology, evolutionary ecology, population genetics, biodiversity, biogeography, palaeobiology and conservation economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信