Institutional regimes and profitability transitions: the case of Indian manufacturing firms

IF 0.8 Q4 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
S. Majumdar, A. Bhattacharjee
{"title":"Institutional regimes and profitability transitions: the case of Indian manufacturing firms","authors":"S. Majumdar, A. Bhattacharjee","doi":"10.1108/IGDR-10-2017-0081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nLiterature, spanning industrial organization and strategic management disciplines, uses variance decomposition to understand the relative importance of firm, industry and business group effects in shaping profitability variations. Some literature analyzes firm profitability under transition to liberalization. Previous research has taken a static before-and-after view on institutional change. This paper aims to focus on the dynamic process of liberalization in India, analyzing how different institutional regime changes alter firm behavior leading to changes in profitability patterns.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nBased on a panel data set of several thousand Indian firms, spanning the 26-year period between 1980-1981 and 2005-2006, the authors determine the relative importance of firm, industry and business group effects in explaining manufacturing firms’ profitability variances across different institutional phases. The authors evaluate three propositions that help assess transition dynamics between phases. They determine the quantum of catch-up or falling behind by firms.\n\n\nFindings\nDifferent industries emerge as profitability leaders, as the economy progresses through different liberalization phases. Business groups that have been more effective in resource appropriation, rent-seeking, politician management and non-market activities in a controlled regime are replaced as profit leaders by those that, in a free-market economy, can be capable of intra-business resource allocation tasks and leveraging corporate capabilities.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe approach demonstrates how to analyze the underlying detailed structure of firm-level data, and performance outcomes, to derive nuanced interpretation of factors giving rise to the effects that explain profitability variances, and how to assess the way these effects behave over time. The dynamic evidence-based approach highlights what factors matter, where, when and why, in influencing profitability variances, which are a key dimension of industrial and economic performance.\n","PeriodicalId":42861,"journal":{"name":"Indian Growth and Development Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/IGDR-10-2017-0081","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Growth and Development Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IGDR-10-2017-0081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose Literature, spanning industrial organization and strategic management disciplines, uses variance decomposition to understand the relative importance of firm, industry and business group effects in shaping profitability variations. Some literature analyzes firm profitability under transition to liberalization. Previous research has taken a static before-and-after view on institutional change. This paper aims to focus on the dynamic process of liberalization in India, analyzing how different institutional regime changes alter firm behavior leading to changes in profitability patterns. Design/methodology/approach Based on a panel data set of several thousand Indian firms, spanning the 26-year period between 1980-1981 and 2005-2006, the authors determine the relative importance of firm, industry and business group effects in explaining manufacturing firms’ profitability variances across different institutional phases. The authors evaluate three propositions that help assess transition dynamics between phases. They determine the quantum of catch-up or falling behind by firms. Findings Different industries emerge as profitability leaders, as the economy progresses through different liberalization phases. Business groups that have been more effective in resource appropriation, rent-seeking, politician management and non-market activities in a controlled regime are replaced as profit leaders by those that, in a free-market economy, can be capable of intra-business resource allocation tasks and leveraging corporate capabilities. Originality/value The approach demonstrates how to analyze the underlying detailed structure of firm-level data, and performance outcomes, to derive nuanced interpretation of factors giving rise to the effects that explain profitability variances, and how to assess the way these effects behave over time. The dynamic evidence-based approach highlights what factors matter, where, when and why, in influencing profitability variances, which are a key dimension of industrial and economic performance.
制度制度和盈利能力的转变:以印度制造企业为例
目的:跨越产业组织和战略管理学科的文献,使用方差分解来理解企业、行业和商业集团在塑造盈利能力变化方面的相对重要性。一些文献分析了经济自由化转型下的企业盈利能力。以往的研究对制度变迁采取了静态的前后对比观点。本文旨在关注印度自由化的动态过程,分析不同制度制度变化如何改变企业行为,从而导致盈利模式的变化。基于数千家印度公司的面板数据集,从1980-1981年到2005-2006年的26年间,作者确定了公司、行业和商业集团效应在解释制造业公司在不同制度阶段的盈利能力差异方面的相对重要性。作者评估了三个命题,有助于评估阶段之间的过渡动态。它们决定了企业追赶或落后的程度。随着经济在不同的自由化阶段的发展,不同的行业成为盈利能力的领导者。在受控制度下,在资源占用、寻租、政治管理和非市场活动方面更为有效的企业集团,被那些在自由市场经济中能够完成企业内部资源分配任务和利用企业能力的企业集团所取代,成为利润领导者。原创性/价值该方法展示了如何分析公司层面数据的潜在详细结构和绩效结果,以得出导致解释盈利能力差异的影响的因素的细微解释,以及如何评估这些影响随时间的表现方式。动态循证方法突出了影响盈利能力差异的哪些因素、地点、时间和原因,这是工业和经济绩效的一个关键方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信