China as Hegemon of the Global Electronics Industry: How It Got That Way and Why It Won't Change

M. Pecht, L. Zuga
{"title":"China as Hegemon of the Global Electronics Industry: How It Got That Way and Why It Won't Change","authors":"M. Pecht, L. Zuga","doi":"10.1109/TCAPT.2009.2032830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By the end of 2008, companies based on the business model of offshore production were observed to be rethinking their business models, tending to consider the repatriation of production bases in order to lower costs and shorten delivery times. In this article, the authors of China's Electronics Industry (2009 Edition), M. Pecht and L. Zuga, (City University of Hong Kong Press, Hong Kong, China, 2009) argue that repatriation is not likely to occur in the electronics industry, where expensive and complex production facilities have been moved offshore over a period of several decades. In particular, China has taken advantage of the West's offshore production model and its associated technology transfer to develop a manufacturing capability that has resulted in the ldquoChina Pricerdquo in electronics. As a result, China now has the infrastructure and electronics supply chain necessary to produce a wide range of products, from simple components to embedded systems and systems integration. This gives China the capability to produce complex electronics applications domestically, including computers, automotive controls, medical instrumentation, avionics, and even sophisticated military command and control systems. The resultant gain in Chinese capabilities, commensurate with the loss in Western capabilities through use of the offshore production model, makes the repatriation of the electronics industry to its former bastions in the United States and Western Europe doubtful. This will have a strong impact on resource allocation, research planning, and innovation. The authors present their argument through a series of brief case studies.","PeriodicalId":55013,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies","volume":"128 1","pages":"935-939"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/TCAPT.2009.2032830","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TCAPT.2009.2032830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

By the end of 2008, companies based on the business model of offshore production were observed to be rethinking their business models, tending to consider the repatriation of production bases in order to lower costs and shorten delivery times. In this article, the authors of China's Electronics Industry (2009 Edition), M. Pecht and L. Zuga, (City University of Hong Kong Press, Hong Kong, China, 2009) argue that repatriation is not likely to occur in the electronics industry, where expensive and complex production facilities have been moved offshore over a period of several decades. In particular, China has taken advantage of the West's offshore production model and its associated technology transfer to develop a manufacturing capability that has resulted in the ldquoChina Pricerdquo in electronics. As a result, China now has the infrastructure and electronics supply chain necessary to produce a wide range of products, from simple components to embedded systems and systems integration. This gives China the capability to produce complex electronics applications domestically, including computers, automotive controls, medical instrumentation, avionics, and even sophisticated military command and control systems. The resultant gain in Chinese capabilities, commensurate with the loss in Western capabilities through use of the offshore production model, makes the repatriation of the electronics industry to its former bastions in the United States and Western Europe doubtful. This will have a strong impact on resource allocation, research planning, and innovation. The authors present their argument through a series of brief case studies.
中国作为全球电子工业的霸主:它是如何做到的,为什么它不会改变
到2008年底,基于离岸生产商业模式的公司被观察到正在重新思考他们的商业模式,倾向于考虑生产基地的遣返,以降低成本和缩短交货时间。在这篇文章中,《中国电子工业》(2009年版)的作者M. Pecht和L. Zuga(香港城市大学出版社,中国香港,2009年)认为,在电子工业中,遣返不太可能发生,在几十年的时间里,昂贵而复杂的生产设施已经转移到海外。特别是,中国利用西方的离岸生产模式及其相关的技术转让来发展制造能力,从而导致了电子产品的低中国价格。因此,中国现在拥有生产各种产品所需的基础设施和电子供应链,从简单的组件到嵌入式系统和系统集成。这使中国有能力在国内生产复杂的电子应用,包括计算机、汽车控制、医疗仪器、航空电子设备,甚至复杂的军事指挥和控制系统。通过使用离岸生产模式,中国能力的增加与西方能力的损失相称,这使得电子工业回归其在美国和西欧的前堡垒令人怀疑。这将对资源配置、研究规划和创新产生重大影响。作者通过一系列简短的案例研究来阐述他们的论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信