Mechanisms of constraint: a clinical inquiry of digital infrastructuring in municipalities

IF 2.4 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Jwan Khisro, Tomas Lindroth, J. Magnusson
{"title":"Mechanisms of constraint: a clinical inquiry of digital infrastructuring in municipalities","authors":"Jwan Khisro, Tomas Lindroth, J. Magnusson","doi":"10.1108/tg-01-2021-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this study is to contribute to research concerning the role of digital infrastructure in digital government. This is done by answering the research question: how does digital infrastructuring constrain ambidexterity in public sector organizations?\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe research is designed as a clinical inquiry in a large Swedish municipality, involving data collection in the form of interviews and internal documents. The method of analysis involves both exploring generative mechanisms in digital infrastructuring and theorizing on the findings based on previous literature.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings identify four generative mechanisms through which stability and change in digital infrastructuring constrain ambidexterity in terms of both efficiency (exploitation) and innovation (exploration).\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study’s limitations are related to international and intersectoral transferability and risks associated with its approach to clinical inquiry. The main implications are its contribution to the literature on how stability counteracts not only innovation but also efficiency and how change counteracts not only efficiency but also innovation.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis study identifies clear generative mechanisms that should be avoided by managers striving for digital government, and it offers clear recommendations for said managers regarding how to avoid them.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThis study offers implications for national-level digital infrastructure policy and contributes to efforts to increase the capabilities of digital government.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nAs two of the four identified generative mechanisms are novel contributions, this study offers a concrete addition to existing research. This study has resulted in factual change in the studied organization as well as at the national level through successful dissemination of the findings for both policy and practice in other public sector organizations.\n","PeriodicalId":51696,"journal":{"name":"Transforming Government- People Process and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transforming Government- People Process and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-01-2021-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to contribute to research concerning the role of digital infrastructure in digital government. This is done by answering the research question: how does digital infrastructuring constrain ambidexterity in public sector organizations? Design/methodology/approach The research is designed as a clinical inquiry in a large Swedish municipality, involving data collection in the form of interviews and internal documents. The method of analysis involves both exploring generative mechanisms in digital infrastructuring and theorizing on the findings based on previous literature. Findings The findings identify four generative mechanisms through which stability and change in digital infrastructuring constrain ambidexterity in terms of both efficiency (exploitation) and innovation (exploration). Research limitations/implications This study’s limitations are related to international and intersectoral transferability and risks associated with its approach to clinical inquiry. The main implications are its contribution to the literature on how stability counteracts not only innovation but also efficiency and how change counteracts not only efficiency but also innovation. Practical implications This study identifies clear generative mechanisms that should be avoided by managers striving for digital government, and it offers clear recommendations for said managers regarding how to avoid them. Social implications This study offers implications for national-level digital infrastructure policy and contributes to efforts to increase the capabilities of digital government. Originality/value As two of the four identified generative mechanisms are novel contributions, this study offers a concrete addition to existing research. This study has resulted in factual change in the studied organization as well as at the national level through successful dissemination of the findings for both policy and practice in other public sector organizations.
约束机制:市政数字基础设施的临床调查
本研究的目的是为数字基础设施在数字政府中的作用的研究做出贡献。这是通过回答研究问题来完成的:数字基础设施如何限制公共部门组织的两面性?设计/方法/方法本研究是在瑞典一个大型城市进行的临床调查,包括以访谈和内部文件的形式收集数据。分析方法包括探索数字基础设施的生成机制和基于先前文献的研究结果的理论化。研究结果确定了四种生成机制,通过这些机制,数字基础设施的稳定性和变化在效率(开发)和创新(探索)方面限制了双灵巧性。研究的局限性/意义本研究的局限性与国际和部门间的可转移性以及与临床调查方法相关的风险有关。其主要含义是它对稳定性如何不仅抵消创新而且抵消效率以及变化如何不仅抵消效率而且抵消创新的文献的贡献。实践意义本研究确定了管理者在努力实现数字政府时应该避免的清晰的生成机制,并就如何避免这些机制为管理者提供了明确的建议。社会意义本研究为国家级数字基础设施政策提供了启示,并有助于提高数字政府的能力。在四个确定的生成机制中,有两个是新颖的贡献,本研究为现有研究提供了具体的补充。这项研究通过在其他公共部门组织的政策和实践方面成功地传播研究结果,使所研究的组织以及国家一级发生了实际变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transforming Government- People Process and Policy
Transforming Government- People Process and Policy INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
11.50%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信