Impact of innovation network on regional innovation performance: do network density, network openness and network strength have any influence?

IF 2.9 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Shuliang Zhao, Jinshuang Li
{"title":"Impact of innovation network on regional innovation performance: do network density, network openness and network strength have any influence?","authors":"Shuliang Zhao, Jinshuang Li","doi":"10.1108/jstpm-05-2022-0084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nWith the development of regional economy, innovation network plays an increasingly prominent role in reducing regional innovation cost and enabling information, knowledge and capital flow and diffusion. Building an efficient innovation network has become a feasible way to improve regional innovation capabilities and performance. Thus, under the background of Chinese special triple helix structure, the specific mechanism of innovation network characteristics on regional innovation performance is still an issue that needs to be studied urgently.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study conducts a multi-level regression analysis regional innovation panel data of China from the past four years to explore how the three dimensions of innovation network characteristics (i.e. network density, openness and strength) affect regional innovation performance.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results show that there is an inverted-U relationship exists between network density and regional innovation performance. The network openness and regional innovation performance show a significantly positive relationship and a U-shaped relationship exists between network strength and regional innovation performance.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nFirst, this study examines the relationship between network density, openness, strength and innovation ability in the network variable structure. However, this study does not analyze how absorptive capacity impacts the network structure and innovation performance of regional innovators. Second, innovation network intensity largely varies according to different types of enterprises or industries. Therefore, future studies can attempt to analyze the relationship between innovation network and innovation performance on the basis of the industry or the enterprise itself. Fourth, this study does not consider the change in the influence of innovation network structure on innovation ability.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe results of this study provide insights for the formulation of the regional innovation policy. First, enterprises must maintain good contact with research institutes, universities and technology intermediaries and promote resource, information and money flow between networks through formal and informal interactions. Enterprises can currently only interact with a limited number of innovative subjects due to their limited resources. Therefore, we should continue implementing the open policy of foreign capital utilization and absorb the technology, knowledge, management, ideas, talent and other resource advantages in the world. The investment environment in the central and western regions should be improved as soon as possible to guide foreign direct investments to the middle and the west part of China, thereby promoting the coordinated development of regional innovation ability and economy.\n\n\nSocial implications\nIn 2015, the Chinese Government proposed “public entrepreneurship and innovation,” including technological, institutional, management and mode innovations. This study suggests that innovation subjects in the region should establish an interactive and dynamic innovation network among innovators.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe innovation of this study lies in the analysis of the characteristics of innovation network that significantly affect regional innovation performance, the exploration of different stages of innovation network construction path and provide theoretical guidance for the construction of innovation network.\n","PeriodicalId":45751,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jstpm-05-2022-0084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose With the development of regional economy, innovation network plays an increasingly prominent role in reducing regional innovation cost and enabling information, knowledge and capital flow and diffusion. Building an efficient innovation network has become a feasible way to improve regional innovation capabilities and performance. Thus, under the background of Chinese special triple helix structure, the specific mechanism of innovation network characteristics on regional innovation performance is still an issue that needs to be studied urgently. Design/methodology/approach This study conducts a multi-level regression analysis regional innovation panel data of China from the past four years to explore how the three dimensions of innovation network characteristics (i.e. network density, openness and strength) affect regional innovation performance. Findings The results show that there is an inverted-U relationship exists between network density and regional innovation performance. The network openness and regional innovation performance show a significantly positive relationship and a U-shaped relationship exists between network strength and regional innovation performance. Research limitations/implications First, this study examines the relationship between network density, openness, strength and innovation ability in the network variable structure. However, this study does not analyze how absorptive capacity impacts the network structure and innovation performance of regional innovators. Second, innovation network intensity largely varies according to different types of enterprises or industries. Therefore, future studies can attempt to analyze the relationship between innovation network and innovation performance on the basis of the industry or the enterprise itself. Fourth, this study does not consider the change in the influence of innovation network structure on innovation ability. Practical implications The results of this study provide insights for the formulation of the regional innovation policy. First, enterprises must maintain good contact with research institutes, universities and technology intermediaries and promote resource, information and money flow between networks through formal and informal interactions. Enterprises can currently only interact with a limited number of innovative subjects due to their limited resources. Therefore, we should continue implementing the open policy of foreign capital utilization and absorb the technology, knowledge, management, ideas, talent and other resource advantages in the world. The investment environment in the central and western regions should be improved as soon as possible to guide foreign direct investments to the middle and the west part of China, thereby promoting the coordinated development of regional innovation ability and economy. Social implications In 2015, the Chinese Government proposed “public entrepreneurship and innovation,” including technological, institutional, management and mode innovations. This study suggests that innovation subjects in the region should establish an interactive and dynamic innovation network among innovators. Originality/value The innovation of this study lies in the analysis of the characteristics of innovation network that significantly affect regional innovation performance, the exploration of different stages of innovation network construction path and provide theoretical guidance for the construction of innovation network.
创新网络对区域创新绩效的影响:网络密度、网络开放程度和网络强度是否有影响?
随着区域经济的发展,创新网络在降低区域创新成本,促进信息、知识和资本流动和扩散方面的作用日益突出。构建高效的创新网络已成为提高区域创新能力和绩效的可行途径。因此,在中国特殊的三螺旋结构背景下,创新网络特征对区域创新绩效的具体作用机制仍是一个亟待研究的问题。设计/方法/方法本研究通过对近四年中国区域创新面板数据进行多层次回归分析,探讨创新网络特征的三个维度(即网络密度、开放度和强度)对区域创新绩效的影响。结果表明,网络密度与区域创新绩效之间存在倒u型关系。网络开放程度与区域创新绩效呈显著正相关,网络强度与区域创新绩效呈u型关系。研究局限/启示首先,本研究在网络变结构中考察了网络密度、开放性、强度和创新能力之间的关系。然而,本研究并未分析吸收能力对区域创新者网络结构和创新绩效的影响。第二,不同类型企业或行业的创新网络强度差异较大。因此,未来的研究可以尝试在行业或企业自身的基础上分析创新网络与创新绩效的关系。第四,本研究未考虑创新网络结构对创新能力影响的变化。实践意义本研究结果为区域创新政策的制定提供了启示。首先,企业必须与科研院所、高校和技术中介机构保持良好的联系,通过正式和非正式的互动促进网络之间的资源、信息和资金流动。由于企业资源有限,目前只能与有限数量的创新主体进行互动。因此,我们应该继续实施利用外资的开放政策,吸收世界上的技术、知识、管理、思想、人才等资源优势。要尽快改善中西部地区的投资环境,引导外商直接投资向中西部地区倾斜,促进区域创新能力与经济协调发展。2015年,中国政府提出“大众创业、万众创新”,包括技术创新、制度创新、管理创新和模式创新。研究认为,区域内的创新主体应在创新主体之间建立一个互动的、动态的创新网络。本研究的创新之处在于分析了显著影响区域创新绩效的创新网络特征,探索了创新网络建设的不同阶段路径,为创新网络建设提供理论指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信