Development model of gender socialization: school textbooks gender analysis in Georgia

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Shalva Tabatadze, Natia Gorgadze
{"title":"Development model of gender socialization: school textbooks gender analysis in Georgia","authors":"Shalva Tabatadze, Natia Gorgadze","doi":"10.1108/jme-05-2022-0065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to explore gender equality in school textbooks in Georgia.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe research had the following questions: To what extent are women and men visible and represented equally in school textbooks? How do school textbooks promote gender socialization of boys and girls to be treated equally in terms of power and privileges, superiority and inferiority? Do school textbooks promote critical thinking and analysis of gender issues and problems? The content analysis of the qualitative research method was used to answer the research questions.\n\n\nFindings\nThe research revealed that males remain more visible in school textbooks; however, the authors mainly attempt to balance the gender representation in textbooks quantitatively. The textbooks do not socialize girls and boys as equals in power, privileges, superiority and inferiority. The textbooks do not provide room for discussing gender and social justice issues.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe study is an original work. The study contributes to the development of the field of multicultural education, as it develops the three levels model of gender socialization based on the empirical research data. The first, detection level, implies the visibility of both boys and girls equally in school textbooks. The second, the recognition level of gender socialization, acknowledges gender equality in occupations, activities and power and privileges. The third, the affirmation level, develops a critical understanding of gender issues and gender equality in society.\n","PeriodicalId":43323,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Multicultural Education","volume":"13 12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Multicultural Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jme-05-2022-0065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to explore gender equality in school textbooks in Georgia. Design/methodology/approach The research had the following questions: To what extent are women and men visible and represented equally in school textbooks? How do school textbooks promote gender socialization of boys and girls to be treated equally in terms of power and privileges, superiority and inferiority? Do school textbooks promote critical thinking and analysis of gender issues and problems? The content analysis of the qualitative research method was used to answer the research questions. Findings The research revealed that males remain more visible in school textbooks; however, the authors mainly attempt to balance the gender representation in textbooks quantitatively. The textbooks do not socialize girls and boys as equals in power, privileges, superiority and inferiority. The textbooks do not provide room for discussing gender and social justice issues. Originality/value The study is an original work. The study contributes to the development of the field of multicultural education, as it develops the three levels model of gender socialization based on the empirical research data. The first, detection level, implies the visibility of both boys and girls equally in school textbooks. The second, the recognition level of gender socialization, acknowledges gender equality in occupations, activities and power and privileges. The third, the affirmation level, develops a critical understanding of gender issues and gender equality in society.
性别社会化的发展模式:格鲁吉亚学校教科书性别分析
目的本研究旨在探讨乔治亚州教科书中的性别平等问题。设计/方法/方法该研究有以下问题:在多大程度上,女性和男性在学校教科书中是平等的?学校教科书如何促进男女性别社会化,使男女在权力和特权、优越感和低人一等方面得到平等对待?学校教科书是否提倡批判性思维和对性别问题的分析?采用定性研究方法的内容分析来回答研究问题。研究结果显示,在学校教科书中,男性仍然更多地出现;然而,作者主要试图在数量上平衡教科书中的性别代表性。教科书并没有将男孩和女孩在权力、特权、优越感和低人一等上平等地社会化。教科书没有提供讨论性别和社会正义问题的空间。这项研究是一项原创工作。本研究在实证研究数据的基础上建立了性别社会化的三层次模型,有助于多元文化教育领域的发展。第一个是检测水平,这意味着男孩和女孩在学校教科书中的可见度是平等的。第二,性别社会化的承认水平,承认性别在职业、活动和权力特权上的平等。第三,肯定层次,培养对社会性别问题和性别平等的批判性理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal for Multicultural Education
Journal for Multicultural Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
18.20%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal for Multicultural Education is a double-blind peer reviewed journal. Published quarterly, the editorial objectives and coverage focus on: Fostering research into the management of multicultural education, understanding multicultural education in the context of teacher-learner equity and enabling learners to collaborate more effectively across ethnic, cultural and linguistic lines. Topics covered include: -Intercultural education- Inclusive education- Urban education- Diversity in education- Ethnicity in education- Gender and education- Disability and education- Technology and Multicultural education The journal is international in coverage and publishes original, theoretical and applied articles by leading scholars, expert consultants and respected practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信