{"title":"The Greater London Council's Homesteading Scheme: Housing Rehabilitation and the Urban Imaginary of Conservative Politics in London, 1977-81.","authors":"Tessa Pinto","doi":"10.1093/tcbh/hwab035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article examines the Greater London Council (GLC)'s Homesteading scheme, which gave away dilapidated, council-owned houses to aspiring homeowners. The first section provides an overview of the scheme and its North American origins. The second half of the article explores the scheme in the context of London's electoral geopolitics, and considers how the relationship between the boroughs and the GLC influenced housing policy across the capital. The article then locates the scheme within the context of the 'inner city', and explores the complex relationship between race, homeownership, and the Conservative Party during the late 1970s. Finally, the article identifies the formation of a Conservative urban imaginary that envisioned London as a 'city of villages', resurrecting the brick terraced street as the ideal domestic form, in opposition to the high-rise housing of welfare state modernism-and in so doing, drew on a growing sense of popular individualism during the decade. To conclude, the article proposes that the GLC's Homesteading scheme was a striking prefiguration of the kinds of urban interventions in British cities that characterized Thatcher's premiership, and that it has significance for understanding a range of diverse, intersecting urban issues during the period.</p>","PeriodicalId":46051,"journal":{"name":"Twentieth Century British History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Twentieth Century British History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tcbh/hwab035","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article examines the Greater London Council (GLC)'s Homesteading scheme, which gave away dilapidated, council-owned houses to aspiring homeowners. The first section provides an overview of the scheme and its North American origins. The second half of the article explores the scheme in the context of London's electoral geopolitics, and considers how the relationship between the boroughs and the GLC influenced housing policy across the capital. The article then locates the scheme within the context of the 'inner city', and explores the complex relationship between race, homeownership, and the Conservative Party during the late 1970s. Finally, the article identifies the formation of a Conservative urban imaginary that envisioned London as a 'city of villages', resurrecting the brick terraced street as the ideal domestic form, in opposition to the high-rise housing of welfare state modernism-and in so doing, drew on a growing sense of popular individualism during the decade. To conclude, the article proposes that the GLC's Homesteading scheme was a striking prefiguration of the kinds of urban interventions in British cities that characterized Thatcher's premiership, and that it has significance for understanding a range of diverse, intersecting urban issues during the period.
大伦敦委员会的家园计划:1977-1981 年伦敦保守派政治中的住房改造与城市想象》(The Greater London Council's Homesteading Scheme: Housing Rehabilitation and the Urban Imaginary of Conservative Politics in London, 1977-1981)。
期刊介绍:
Twentieth Century British History covers the variety of British history in the twentieth century in all its aspects. It links the many different and specialized branches of historical scholarship with work in political science and related disciplines. The journal seeks to transcend traditional disciplinary boundaries, in order to foster the study of patterns of change and continuity across the twentieth century. The editors are committed to publishing work that examines the British experience within a comparative context, whether European or Anglo-American.