Does the WTO government procurement agreement influence steel imports

IF 1 Q2 LAW
Benjamin H. Liebman
{"title":"Does the WTO government procurement agreement influence steel imports","authors":"Benjamin H. Liebman","doi":"10.1108/JITLP-07-2016-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose \n \n \n \n \nGovernment procurement policies containing domestic content requirements have faced increasing attention, as more traditional forms of trade discrimination have declined in recent decades. The most important effort to reduce discriminatory government procurement policies is the plurilateral Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA), in which a subset of WTO countries has agreed to provide increased access to imports from fellow signatory countries. This paper focuses on the Buy American policy, which mandates domestic content for all US Federal government purchase above the micro-purchase level. The author tests whether steel imports from GPA and US Free Trade Agreement (FTA) partners, both of which receive preferential access to US federal procurements, increase as the value of federal construction contracts rise. \n \n \n \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \n \n \n \n \nThe author tracks federal construction contracts and seeks to determine whether there is a link between these contracts and construction grade steel imports from GPA and US FTA members. The author uses two-stage least squares to regress the import quantity of steel from GPA and US FTA countries on the value of US federal construction contracts. Imported and domestic steel prices as well as macroeconomic variables such as industrial production and non-residential construction are controlled for. A panel data set is used that includes three different construction-grade steel products and covers years 2004-2013. \n \n \n \n \nFindings \n \n \n \n \nThe results indicate that increased federal construction contracts increase imports of construction-grade steel from GPA and FTA partners. This effect is relatively small, however, which may be due to the fact that federal construction is a small share of overall US construction. In general, the results suggest that the primary determinant of US import sourcing behavior is the business cycle as well as the price of steel. Nevertheless, the findings indicate that the preferences provided by the GPA and FTAs do have some impact on where US construction firms source their steel. \n \n \n \n \nOriginality/value \n \n \n \n \nPrevious research has studied the effect of the WTO’s GPA on foreign access to federal construction and other service contracts. This is the first study, however, to investigate whether these contracts impact the import sourcing behavior of the steel that is used in construction. Furthermore, while previous research measures the impact of GPA membership on the overall trade of goods and services, this paper is the first to link a particular industry with the inputs that are restricted by local content requirements such as the Buy American policy but freed up under the GPA. In general, previous research on the GPA has tried to capture the broad effect of GPA membership on trade, while this study focuses on the relationship between the GPA, federal procurement in a particular industry (construction) and import behavior of a key input, construction grade steel.","PeriodicalId":42719,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Trade Law and Policy","volume":"15 1","pages":"153-167"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/JITLP-07-2016-0015","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Trade Law and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JITLP-07-2016-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose Government procurement policies containing domestic content requirements have faced increasing attention, as more traditional forms of trade discrimination have declined in recent decades. The most important effort to reduce discriminatory government procurement policies is the plurilateral Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA), in which a subset of WTO countries has agreed to provide increased access to imports from fellow signatory countries. This paper focuses on the Buy American policy, which mandates domestic content for all US Federal government purchase above the micro-purchase level. The author tests whether steel imports from GPA and US Free Trade Agreement (FTA) partners, both of which receive preferential access to US federal procurements, increase as the value of federal construction contracts rise. Design/methodology/approach The author tracks federal construction contracts and seeks to determine whether there is a link between these contracts and construction grade steel imports from GPA and US FTA members. The author uses two-stage least squares to regress the import quantity of steel from GPA and US FTA countries on the value of US federal construction contracts. Imported and domestic steel prices as well as macroeconomic variables such as industrial production and non-residential construction are controlled for. A panel data set is used that includes three different construction-grade steel products and covers years 2004-2013. Findings The results indicate that increased federal construction contracts increase imports of construction-grade steel from GPA and FTA partners. This effect is relatively small, however, which may be due to the fact that federal construction is a small share of overall US construction. In general, the results suggest that the primary determinant of US import sourcing behavior is the business cycle as well as the price of steel. Nevertheless, the findings indicate that the preferences provided by the GPA and FTAs do have some impact on where US construction firms source their steel. Originality/value Previous research has studied the effect of the WTO’s GPA on foreign access to federal construction and other service contracts. This is the first study, however, to investigate whether these contracts impact the import sourcing behavior of the steel that is used in construction. Furthermore, while previous research measures the impact of GPA membership on the overall trade of goods and services, this paper is the first to link a particular industry with the inputs that are restricted by local content requirements such as the Buy American policy but freed up under the GPA. In general, previous research on the GPA has tried to capture the broad effect of GPA membership on trade, while this study focuses on the relationship between the GPA, federal procurement in a particular industry (construction) and import behavior of a key input, construction grade steel.
WTO政府采购协议对钢材进口有影响吗
最近几十年来,随着传统形式的贸易歧视减少,包含国内含量要求的政府采购政策受到越来越多的关注。减少歧视性政府采购政策的最重要努力是《政府采购诸边协定》(GPA),其中一部分世贸组织国家同意增加从其他签署国进口的机会。本文的研究重点是购买美国货政策,该政策要求美国联邦政府在微观采购层面以上的所有采购都必须包含国内内容。作者检验了来自GPA和美国自由贸易协定(FTA)伙伴的钢材进口是否会随着联邦建筑合同价值的上升而增加,这两个国家都获得了美国联邦采购的优惠准入。设计/方法/方法作者追踪联邦建筑合同,并试图确定这些合同与从GPA和美国自由贸易协定成员国进口的建筑级钢材之间是否存在联系。本文采用两阶段最小二乘法对美国联邦建筑合同价值对GPA和FTA国家钢材进口量的影响进行了回归。进口和国内钢材价格以及工业生产和非住宅建设等宏观经济变量都受到控制。使用的面板数据集包括三种不同的建筑级钢产品,涵盖2004-2013年。研究结果表明,增加的联邦建筑合同增加了从GPA和FTA合作伙伴进口的建筑级钢材。然而,这种影响相对较小,这可能是由于联邦建设只占美国整体建设的一小部分。总体而言,研究结果表明,美国进口采购行为的主要决定因素是商业周期和钢铁价格。然而,研究结果表明,《政府采购协定》和《自由贸易协定》提供的偏好确实对美国建筑公司的钢材来源有一定影响。先前的研究已经研究了WTO GPA对外国获得联邦建筑和其他服务合同的影响。然而,这是第一项研究,调查这些合同是否影响建筑中使用的钢材的进口采购行为。此外,虽然之前的研究衡量了GPA成员对整体商品和服务贸易的影响,但本文首次将特定行业与输入联系起来,这些输入受到本地内容要求(如购买美国货政策)的限制,但在GPA下是自由的。一般来说,之前关于GPA的研究试图捕捉GPA成员对贸易的广泛影响,而本研究侧重于GPA,特定行业(建筑)的联邦采购和关键投入(建筑级钢)进口行为之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Journal of International Trade Law and Policy is a peer reviewed interdisciplinary journal with a focus upon the nexus of international economic policy and international economic law. It is receptive, but not limited, to the methods of economics, law, and the social sciences. As scholars tend to read individual articles of particular interest to them, rather than an entire issue, authors are not required to write with full accessibility to readers from all disciplines within the purview of the Journal. However, interdisciplinary communication should be fostered where possible. Thus economists can utilize quantitative methods (including econometrics and statistics), while legal scholars and political scientists can invoke specialized techniques and theories. Appendices are encouraged for more technical material. Submissions should contribute to understanding international economic policy and the institutional/legal architecture in which it is implemented. Submissions can be conceptual (theoretical) and/or empirical and/or doctrinal in content. Topics of interest to the Journal are expected to evolve over time but include: -All aspects of international trade law and policy -All aspects of international investment law and policy -All aspects of international development law and policy -All aspects of international financial law and policy -Relationship between economic policy and law and other societal concerns, including the human rights, environment, health, development, and national security
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信