The initial design and programme theory for a new work-focused psychotherapeutic intervention to treat moderate-severe recurrent depression and enhance job retention

IF 1 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Nicola Walker, Sally J Hall
{"title":"The initial design and programme theory for a new work-focused psychotherapeutic intervention to treat moderate-severe recurrent depression and enhance job retention","authors":"Nicola Walker, Sally J Hall","doi":"10.1108/mhrj-12-2020-0094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nHere, this study aims to report a case study of the initial design and programme theory of an interdisciplinary work-focused relational group cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) treatment programme for moderate-severe depression using realist methods.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis case study shows how the authors designed the intervention using component analysis of existing literature and focus groups of frontline practitioners and former service users and mind-mapping analysis to establish its operational logic and evaluated the theory underpinning the intervention using realist synthesis and evaluation to establish its conceptual logic.\n\n\nFindings\nAn iterative hybrid approach of literature review, component analysis, focus group discussion and realist methods established the initial design and programme theory for the new intervention. The intervention focused on three areas of therapy, three inter-dependent outcomes, in a group format, with opportunities created for peer interaction. The main theoretical principles most likely to promote efficacy were to accelerate and optimise activation of one or more of six hypothesised mechanisms: realise, reflect, regulate, resolve, relate and retain/resume in the context of skilfully facilitated group psychotherapy.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThis study outlines a methodological approach based on the layered ontology of critical realist philosophy, applied to a successful example, which will be useful during the early stages of the design and development of new group-based psychotherapeutic interventions.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nBy adopting the critical realist approach, the authors identified underlying mechanisms of change in relational group CBT. The theoretically integrated approach involving service users and practitioners from different professional backgrounds was unique and meant that the treatment programme was multi-modal rather than informed by a single therapeutic or theoretical approach.\n","PeriodicalId":45687,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health Review Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health Review Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mhrj-12-2020-0094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Here, this study aims to report a case study of the initial design and programme theory of an interdisciplinary work-focused relational group cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) treatment programme for moderate-severe depression using realist methods. Design/methodology/approach This case study shows how the authors designed the intervention using component analysis of existing literature and focus groups of frontline practitioners and former service users and mind-mapping analysis to establish its operational logic and evaluated the theory underpinning the intervention using realist synthesis and evaluation to establish its conceptual logic. Findings An iterative hybrid approach of literature review, component analysis, focus group discussion and realist methods established the initial design and programme theory for the new intervention. The intervention focused on three areas of therapy, three inter-dependent outcomes, in a group format, with opportunities created for peer interaction. The main theoretical principles most likely to promote efficacy were to accelerate and optimise activation of one or more of six hypothesised mechanisms: realise, reflect, regulate, resolve, relate and retain/resume in the context of skilfully facilitated group psychotherapy. Social implications This study outlines a methodological approach based on the layered ontology of critical realist philosophy, applied to a successful example, which will be useful during the early stages of the design and development of new group-based psychotherapeutic interventions. Originality/value By adopting the critical realist approach, the authors identified underlying mechanisms of change in relational group CBT. The theoretically integrated approach involving service users and practitioners from different professional backgrounds was unique and meant that the treatment programme was multi-modal rather than informed by a single therapeutic or theoretical approach.
一种新的以工作为中心的心理治疗干预的初步设计和方案理论,以治疗中重度复发性抑郁症并提高工作留任率
目的:本研究旨在报告一个应用现实主义方法的以工作为中心的跨学科关系群体认知行为疗法(CBT)治疗中重度抑郁症的初步设计和方案理论的案例研究。设计/方法论/方法本案例研究展示了作者如何利用现有文献和一线从业人员和前服务使用者焦点小组的成分分析和思维导图分析来设计干预措施,以建立其操作逻辑,并利用现实主义综合和评估来评估支撑干预措施的理论,以建立其概念逻辑。文献回顾、成分分析、焦点小组讨论和现实主义方法的迭代混合方法为新干预建立了初步设计和方案理论。干预集中在治疗的三个领域,三个相互依赖的结果,以小组形式,并为同伴互动创造机会。最有可能提高疗效的主要理论原则是加速和优化六种假设机制中的一种或多种的激活:在巧妙促进的团体心理治疗的背景下,实现、反映、调节、解决、联系和保留/恢复。本研究概述了一种基于批判现实主义哲学的分层本体论的方法论方法,并将其应用于一个成功的例子,这将在设计和开发新的基于群体的心理治疗干预措施的早期阶段有用。原创性/价值通过采用批判现实主义的方法,作者确定了关系群体CBT变化的潜在机制。涉及来自不同专业背景的服务使用者和从业人员的理论综合方法是独特的,这意味着治疗方案是多模式的,而不是由单一的治疗或理论方法提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信