The building as a palimpsest: heritage, memory and adaptive reuse beyond intervention

IF 1.1 Q4 GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
F. Lanz
{"title":"The building as a palimpsest: heritage, memory and adaptive reuse beyond intervention","authors":"F. Lanz","doi":"10.1108/jchmsd-06-2022-0106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper contributes to this special issue on the ethics and aesthetics of adaptive reuse with a reflection on the specific case of the reuse of those sites and buildings that can be regarded as “difficult”, “uncomfortable”, or “neglected” heritage (MacDonald, 2009; Logan and Keir, 2009; Pendlebury et al., 2018; Lanz, 2021). By doing so it is the author's intention to add to the most recent research-driven and theory-oriented strand of the contemporary architectural debate on adaptive reuse (Lanz and Pendlebury, 2022). They also intend to encourage increased research engagement within such a debate, both across disciplines and with methods and approaches that may be able to bring in greater critical consideration of the more-than-architectural aspects involved in adaptive reuse practices.Design/methodology/approachBuilding equally on a comprehensive literature review on the subject and extensive field work, the paper works through one paradigmatic example – the San Girolamo mental asylum in Volterra, Italy – and combines on-site observation, field notes, qualitative interviews and archival research with theory-driven reflections to discuss the ramifications of adaptive reuse processes in place-based memory and heritage practices.FindingsThe case of the former mental asylum San Girolamo in Volterra, today abandoned and decaying on the landscape, is discussed via the metaphor of the building as palimpsest to explore the significance of this built heritage in both its materiality and meanings. The San Girolamo asylum demonstrates the value, complexity and potential of this heritage site, and other alike, to act as a powerful place which connects the past and present that might serve as a platform to promote productive discourses about contemporary sensible topics, ethics of care and human rights. Drawing on these observations, the paper concludes by expanding on how the case of the San Girolamo former asylum both showcases and advocates the need for developing more creative, explorative, trans-disciplinary and collaborative approaches and methodologies to the study and implementation of adaptive reuse projects for these site “beyond intervention”.Originality/valueThis paper draws on and contributes to the more recent research-driven and theory-oriented corpus of studies focussing on adaptive reuse.","PeriodicalId":45408,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jchmsd-06-2022-0106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis paper contributes to this special issue on the ethics and aesthetics of adaptive reuse with a reflection on the specific case of the reuse of those sites and buildings that can be regarded as “difficult”, “uncomfortable”, or “neglected” heritage (MacDonald, 2009; Logan and Keir, 2009; Pendlebury et al., 2018; Lanz, 2021). By doing so it is the author's intention to add to the most recent research-driven and theory-oriented strand of the contemporary architectural debate on adaptive reuse (Lanz and Pendlebury, 2022). They also intend to encourage increased research engagement within such a debate, both across disciplines and with methods and approaches that may be able to bring in greater critical consideration of the more-than-architectural aspects involved in adaptive reuse practices.Design/methodology/approachBuilding equally on a comprehensive literature review on the subject and extensive field work, the paper works through one paradigmatic example – the San Girolamo mental asylum in Volterra, Italy – and combines on-site observation, field notes, qualitative interviews and archival research with theory-driven reflections to discuss the ramifications of adaptive reuse processes in place-based memory and heritage practices.FindingsThe case of the former mental asylum San Girolamo in Volterra, today abandoned and decaying on the landscape, is discussed via the metaphor of the building as palimpsest to explore the significance of this built heritage in both its materiality and meanings. The San Girolamo asylum demonstrates the value, complexity and potential of this heritage site, and other alike, to act as a powerful place which connects the past and present that might serve as a platform to promote productive discourses about contemporary sensible topics, ethics of care and human rights. Drawing on these observations, the paper concludes by expanding on how the case of the San Girolamo former asylum both showcases and advocates the need for developing more creative, explorative, trans-disciplinary and collaborative approaches and methodologies to the study and implementation of adaptive reuse projects for these site “beyond intervention”.Originality/valueThis paper draws on and contributes to the more recent research-driven and theory-oriented corpus of studies focussing on adaptive reuse.
该建筑作为一个重写本:遗产,记忆和适应性再利用超越干预
本文通过对那些被认为是“困难的”、“不舒服的”或“被忽视的”遗产的场地和建筑的再利用的具体案例的反思,对适应性再利用的伦理和美学这一特殊问题做出了贡献(MacDonald, 2009;Logan and Keir, 2009;Pendlebury等人,2018;Lanz, 2021)。通过这样做,作者的意图是增加最新的研究驱动和理论导向的关于适应性再利用的当代建筑辩论(Lanz和Pendlebury, 2022)。他们还打算在这样的辩论中鼓励更多的研究参与,无论是跨学科的,还是方法和方法,这些方法和方法可能会带来更多的批判性考虑,而不仅仅是自适应重用实践中涉及的架构方面。设计/方法/方法:本文以全面的文献综述和广泛的实地工作为基础,通过一个典型的例子——意大利Volterra的San Girolamo精神病院——将现场观察、实地记录、定性访谈和档案研究与理论驱动的反思相结合,讨论基于地点的记忆和遗产实践中适应性再利用过程的后果。在Volterra的前精神病院San Girolamo的案例中,今天被遗弃并在景观中腐烂,通过建筑作为重写本的隐喻来探讨这个建筑遗产在物质和意义上的重要性。圣吉罗拉莫收容所展示了这个遗产遗址的价值、复杂性和潜力,以及其他类似的东西,作为一个连接过去和现在的强大场所,可以作为一个平台,促进关于当代敏感话题、关怀伦理和人权的富有成效的话语。根据这些观察结果,本文最后扩展了圣吉罗拉莫前收容所的案例,展示并倡导了开发更具创造性、探索性、跨学科和协作性的方法和方法的必要性,以研究和实施这些场地的适应性再利用项目“超越干预”。原创性/价值本文借鉴并贡献了最近研究驱动和理论导向的研究语料库,这些研究集中在适应性重用上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信