Patient Safety in the Cardiac Operating Room: What Can, Will, and Might Make Patients Safer and You Happier?

J. Abernathy
{"title":"Patient Safety in the Cardiac Operating Room: What Can, Will, and Might Make Patients Safer and You Happier?","authors":"J. Abernathy","doi":"10.1097/ASA.0000000000000031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The cardiac operating room (OR) is a complex environment consisting of four teams of providers—surgeons, nurses, perfusionists, and anesthesiologists—and where a myriad of complicated equipment is often crammed into a space that might not have been designed for this purpose. Despite the obstacles, mortality and morbidity from cardiac surgery have steadily decreased over the past decade. Inevitably, however, humans continue to make errors. Gawande and colleagues found that adverse events occurred in 12% of cardiac surgical operations, compared with only 3% in a general surgery population. Some 28,000 of the 350,000 cardiac surgical patients in the United States each year will have an adverse, preventable event. Preventable errors are not related to failure of technical skill, training, or knowledge, but represent cognitive, system, or teamwork failures (Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/ASA/A558). Jim Reason, the renowned human factors engineer, was the first to propose a simplified model of error, now referred to as the ‘‘Swiss cheese’’ model (Figure 1). This model eloquently describes how hidden—or, in human factors terminology, latent— errors can line up to create actual errors or patient harm. In one example, originally outlined by Pronovost et al., a patient suffered from a venous air embolism not because a doctor was careless, but because there were many hidden failures, often termed latent failures, that added up to create a catastrophe. In this example, components of latent error included poor communication, lack of protocols or lack of knowledge of protocols, inadequate training, and fear of retribution if the nurse spoke up. Resilient systems are designed to reduce the number of latent errors. If there are fewer latent errors, the holes in the Swiss cheese for an error to pass through are harder to align.","PeriodicalId":91163,"journal":{"name":"Refresher courses in anesthesiology","volume":"43 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/ASA.0000000000000031","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Refresher courses in anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ASA.0000000000000031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The cardiac operating room (OR) is a complex environment consisting of four teams of providers—surgeons, nurses, perfusionists, and anesthesiologists—and where a myriad of complicated equipment is often crammed into a space that might not have been designed for this purpose. Despite the obstacles, mortality and morbidity from cardiac surgery have steadily decreased over the past decade. Inevitably, however, humans continue to make errors. Gawande and colleagues found that adverse events occurred in 12% of cardiac surgical operations, compared with only 3% in a general surgery population. Some 28,000 of the 350,000 cardiac surgical patients in the United States each year will have an adverse, preventable event. Preventable errors are not related to failure of technical skill, training, or knowledge, but represent cognitive, system, or teamwork failures (Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/ASA/A558). Jim Reason, the renowned human factors engineer, was the first to propose a simplified model of error, now referred to as the ‘‘Swiss cheese’’ model (Figure 1). This model eloquently describes how hidden—or, in human factors terminology, latent— errors can line up to create actual errors or patient harm. In one example, originally outlined by Pronovost et al., a patient suffered from a venous air embolism not because a doctor was careless, but because there were many hidden failures, often termed latent failures, that added up to create a catastrophe. In this example, components of latent error included poor communication, lack of protocols or lack of knowledge of protocols, inadequate training, and fear of retribution if the nurse spoke up. Resilient systems are designed to reduce the number of latent errors. If there are fewer latent errors, the holes in the Swiss cheese for an error to pass through are harder to align.
心脏手术室的病人安全:什么能、什么会、什么可能让病人更安全,让你更快乐?
心脏手术室(OR)是一个复杂的环境,由四组提供者组成——外科医生、护士、灌注师和麻醉师——无数复杂的设备常常挤在一个可能不是为此目的而设计的空间里。尽管存在障碍,心脏手术的死亡率和发病率在过去十年中稳步下降。然而,人类不可避免地会继续犯错。Gawande和他的同事发现,12%的心脏外科手术发生了不良事件,而在普通外科手术人群中,这一比例仅为3%。在美国,每年35万例心脏手术患者中,约有2.8万例会发生可预防的不良事件。可预防的错误与技术技能、培训或知识的失败无关,而是代表认知、系统或团队合作的失败(补充数字内容1,http://links.lww.com/ASA/A558)。著名的人为因素工程师吉姆·瑞森(Jim Reason)第一个提出了一个简化的错误模型,现在被称为“瑞士奶酪”模型(图1)。这个模型雄辩地描述了隐藏的错误(或者用人为因素术语来说,潜在的错误)是如何形成实际错误或对患者造成伤害的。在Pronovost等人最初概述的一个例子中,一名患者遭受静脉空气栓塞不是因为医生的粗心大意,而是因为有许多隐藏的失败,通常被称为潜在的失败,这些失败加起来造成了一场灾难。在这个例子中,潜在错误的组成部分包括沟通不良,缺乏协议或缺乏协议知识,培训不足,以及担心如果护士说出来会受到报复。弹性系统旨在减少潜在错误的数量。如果潜在的错误较少,瑞士奶酪上让错误通过的孔就更难对齐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信