Institutional change and stability in strategic networks in the Brazilian pharmaceutical industry

IF 1.2 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
J. Monticelli, D. Wegner
{"title":"Institutional change and stability in strategic networks in the Brazilian pharmaceutical industry","authors":"J. Monticelli, D. Wegner","doi":"10.1108/ijphm-12-2020-0105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to analyze the dynamics of the institutional change and institutional stability undergone by strategic networks (SNs) in the pharmaceutical industry.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors performed a case study with four Brazilian SNs which followed different patterns of institutional change and institutional stability. Twenty network managers and network members from the pharmaceutical industry were interviewed, and documents were analyzed.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results show how and why institutions changed or remained the same. More specifically, exogenous shocks can negatively impact the competitive environment influencing institutional change in SNs. Moreover, endogenous shocks may prevent institutional change and stimulate institutional stability. Continuous interaction between institutions and SNs is the key to institutional change, especially if public and private policies are considered a source of political institutions.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nResearch has highlighted the endogenous influence of SNs on firms in selecting their partners and arranging their positions in the SNs, but little attention has been paid to how SNs themselves respond to institutions or promote institutional change. This study explains how and why change fails at the network level, additionally pinpointing the main sources of the institutional change and inertia in SNs. As such, network members may use different strategies to stimulate institutional change or stability according to their interests.\n","PeriodicalId":51798,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijphm-12-2020-0105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to analyze the dynamics of the institutional change and institutional stability undergone by strategic networks (SNs) in the pharmaceutical industry. Design/methodology/approach The authors performed a case study with four Brazilian SNs which followed different patterns of institutional change and institutional stability. Twenty network managers and network members from the pharmaceutical industry were interviewed, and documents were analyzed. Findings The results show how and why institutions changed or remained the same. More specifically, exogenous shocks can negatively impact the competitive environment influencing institutional change in SNs. Moreover, endogenous shocks may prevent institutional change and stimulate institutional stability. Continuous interaction between institutions and SNs is the key to institutional change, especially if public and private policies are considered a source of political institutions. Originality/value Research has highlighted the endogenous influence of SNs on firms in selecting their partners and arranging their positions in the SNs, but little attention has been paid to how SNs themselves respond to institutions or promote institutional change. This study explains how and why change fails at the network level, additionally pinpointing the main sources of the institutional change and inertia in SNs. As such, network members may use different strategies to stimulate institutional change or stability according to their interests.
巴西制药业战略网络的制度变迁和稳定性
目的本研究旨在分析制药行业战略网络所经历的制度变迁和制度稳定的动态。设计/方法/方法作者对四个巴西SNs进行了案例研究,这些SNs遵循不同的制度变革和制度稳定模式。对来自医药行业的20名网络管理者和网络成员进行访谈,并对文献进行分析。调查结果显示了机构如何以及为什么改变或保持不变。更具体地说,外生冲击会对影响SNs制度变迁的竞争环境产生负面影响。此外,内生冲击可能阻碍制度变革,刺激制度稳定。机构和社交网络之间的持续互动是制度变革的关键,特别是如果公共和私人政策被视为政治制度的来源。独创性/价值研究强调了社交网络对企业选择合作伙伴和安排其在社交网络中的位置的内生影响,但很少关注社交网络本身如何应对制度或促进制度变革。本研究解释了网络层面的变革是如何以及为什么失败的,并指出了社交网络中制度变革和惯性的主要来源。因此,网络成员可能会根据自己的利益,采取不同的策略来刺激制度的变化或稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信