ECHO: A hierarchical combination of classical and multi-agent epistemic planning problems

IF 0.7 4区 数学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
Davide Soldà, F. Fabiano, A. Dovier
{"title":"ECHO: A hierarchical combination of classical and multi-agent epistemic planning problems","authors":"Davide Soldà, F. Fabiano, A. Dovier","doi":"10.1093/logcom/exad036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The continuous interest in Artificial Intelligence (AI) has brought, among other things, the development of several scenarios where multiple artificial entities interact with each other. As for all the other autonomous settings, these multi-agent systems require orchestration. This is, generally, achieved through techniques derived from the vast field of Automated Planning. Notably, arbitration in multi-agent domains is not only tasked with regulating how the agents act, but must also consider the interactions between the agents’ information flows and must, therefore, reason on an epistemic level. This brings a substantial overhead that often diminishes the reasoning process’s usability in real-world situations. To address this problem, we present ECHO, a hierarchical framework that embeds classical and multi-agent epistemic (epistemic, for brevity) planners in a single architecture. The idea is to combine (i) classical; and(ii) epistemic solvers to model efficiently the agents’ interactions with the (i) ‘physical world’; and(ii) information flows, respectively. In particular, the presented architecture starts by planning on the ‘epistemic level’, with a high level of abstraction, focusing only on the information flows. Then it refines the planning process, due to the classical planner, to fully characterize the interactions with the ‘physical’ world. To further optimize the solving process, we introduced the concept of macros in epistemic planning and enriched the ‘classical’ part of the domain with goal-networks.\n Finally, we evaluated our approach in an actual robotic environment showing that our architecture indeed reduces the overall computational time.","PeriodicalId":50162,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Logic and Computation","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Logic and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exad036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The continuous interest in Artificial Intelligence (AI) has brought, among other things, the development of several scenarios where multiple artificial entities interact with each other. As for all the other autonomous settings, these multi-agent systems require orchestration. This is, generally, achieved through techniques derived from the vast field of Automated Planning. Notably, arbitration in multi-agent domains is not only tasked with regulating how the agents act, but must also consider the interactions between the agents’ information flows and must, therefore, reason on an epistemic level. This brings a substantial overhead that often diminishes the reasoning process’s usability in real-world situations. To address this problem, we present ECHO, a hierarchical framework that embeds classical and multi-agent epistemic (epistemic, for brevity) planners in a single architecture. The idea is to combine (i) classical; and(ii) epistemic solvers to model efficiently the agents’ interactions with the (i) ‘physical world’; and(ii) information flows, respectively. In particular, the presented architecture starts by planning on the ‘epistemic level’, with a high level of abstraction, focusing only on the information flows. Then it refines the planning process, due to the classical planner, to fully characterize the interactions with the ‘physical’ world. To further optimize the solving process, we introduced the concept of macros in epistemic planning and enriched the ‘classical’ part of the domain with goal-networks. Finally, we evaluated our approach in an actual robotic environment showing that our architecture indeed reduces the overall computational time.
ECHO:经典和多智能体认知规划问题的分层组合
对人工智能(AI)的持续兴趣带来了多种场景的发展,其中多个人工实体相互交互。对于所有其他自治设置,这些多代理系统需要编排。一般来说,这是通过从自动化规划的广阔领域中衍生出来的技术来实现的。值得注意的是,多智能体领域的仲裁不仅负责调节智能体的行为方式,还必须考虑智能体信息流之间的相互作用,因此必须在认知层面上进行推理。这带来了大量的开销,通常会降低推理过程在实际情况下的可用性。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了ECHO,这是一个分层框架,将经典和多智能体认知(简称认知)规划器嵌入到单个架构中。这个想法是结合(1)古典;以及(ii)认知求解器,以有效地模拟代理与(i)“物理世界”的相互作用;(二)信息流。特别地,所呈现的体系结构从“认知层面”的规划开始,具有高层次的抽象,只关注信息流。然后,它细化了规划过程,由于经典的计划,以充分表征与“物理”世界的互动。为了进一步优化求解过程,我们在认知规划中引入了宏的概念,并用目标网络丰富了领域的“经典”部分。最后,我们在实际的机器人环境中评估了我们的方法,表明我们的架构确实减少了总体计算时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Logic and Computation
Journal of Logic and Computation 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Logic has found application in virtually all aspects of Information Technology, from software engineering and hardware to programming and artificial intelligence. Indeed, logic, artificial intelligence and theoretical computing are influencing each other to the extent that a new interdisciplinary area of Logic and Computation is emerging. The Journal of Logic and Computation aims to promote the growth of logic and computing, including, among others, the following areas of interest: Logical Systems, such as classical and non-classical logic, constructive logic, categorical logic, modal logic, type theory, feasible maths.... Logical issues in logic programming, knowledge-based systems and automated reasoning; logical issues in knowledge representation, such as non-monotonic reasoning and systems of knowledge and belief; logics and semantics of programming; specification and verification of programs and systems; applications of logic in hardware and VLSI, natural language, concurrent computation, planning, and databases. The bulk of the content is technical scientific papers, although letters, reviews, and discussions, as well as relevant conference reviews, are included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书