Medical student perspectives on radiology subspecialties prior to core clerkship

IF 1.5 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Alexis M. Medema MScR , Stacy M. Goins BA , Charles M. Maxfield MD , Lars J. Grimm MD, MHS , Robert J. French MD , Jonathan G. Martin MD
{"title":"Medical student perspectives on radiology subspecialties prior to core clerkship","authors":"Alexis M. Medema MScR ,&nbsp;Stacy M. Goins BA ,&nbsp;Charles M. Maxfield MD ,&nbsp;Lars J. Grimm MD, MHS ,&nbsp;Robert J. French MD ,&nbsp;Jonathan G. Martin MD","doi":"10.1067/j.cpradiol.2023.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and objectives</h3><p>Radiology remains underrepresented in U.S. medical school clinical curricula, and preconceived opinions about the field may impact whether students pursue elective exposure. A core radiology clerkship at one academic institution presents an opportunity to evaluate students’ early preferences for different radiology subspecialties, thus informing curricular design and inspiring student recruitment.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>At a single allopathic medical school, a required, four-week, clinical-year radiology clerkship that occurs in the second year includes immersive one-week experiences in two subspecialties. Prior to their clerkship, students rank their immersion preferences by distributing 100 points across eight fields, the values of which were analyzed as a proxy for interest. A secondary survey was distributed to active first- and second-year medical students to further investigate the factors drawing them to radiology.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Immersive experiences in musculoskeletal, body, and breast imaging were most preferred, earning ≥20 points from 41.6 %, 34.3 %, and 31.9 % of students, respectively. Women were significantly more likely than men to express interest in breast imaging (35.8 % vs. 24.8 %, </span><em>p</em><span> = 0.037) and pediatric radiology (28.8 % vs. 12.8 %, </span><em>p</em> = 0.001). Men were significantly more likely than women to prefer body imaging (41.9 % vs. 30.2 %, <em>p</em><span> = 0.034), neuroradiology (29.1 % vs. 19.5 %, </span><em>p</em><span> = 0.048), and nuclear medicine (11.1 % vs. 5.1 %, </span><em>p</em> = 0.044).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Early in their clinical education, medical students prefer certain subspecialties, especially musculoskeletal, body, and breast imaging. Women expressed significantly stronger interest in breast imaging and pediatric radiology, while men indicated significantly stronger interest in body imaging, neuroradiology, and nuclear medicine.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51617,"journal":{"name":"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology","volume":"53 2","pages":"Pages 239-242"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363018823001652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale and objectives

Radiology remains underrepresented in U.S. medical school clinical curricula, and preconceived opinions about the field may impact whether students pursue elective exposure. A core radiology clerkship at one academic institution presents an opportunity to evaluate students’ early preferences for different radiology subspecialties, thus informing curricular design and inspiring student recruitment.

Materials and methods

At a single allopathic medical school, a required, four-week, clinical-year radiology clerkship that occurs in the second year includes immersive one-week experiences in two subspecialties. Prior to their clerkship, students rank their immersion preferences by distributing 100 points across eight fields, the values of which were analyzed as a proxy for interest. A secondary survey was distributed to active first- and second-year medical students to further investigate the factors drawing them to radiology.

Results

Immersive experiences in musculoskeletal, body, and breast imaging were most preferred, earning ≥20 points from 41.6 %, 34.3 %, and 31.9 % of students, respectively. Women were significantly more likely than men to express interest in breast imaging (35.8 % vs. 24.8 %, p = 0.037) and pediatric radiology (28.8 % vs. 12.8 %, p = 0.001). Men were significantly more likely than women to prefer body imaging (41.9 % vs. 30.2 %, p = 0.034), neuroradiology (29.1 % vs. 19.5 %, p = 0.048), and nuclear medicine (11.1 % vs. 5.1 %, p = 0.044).

Conclusion

Early in their clinical education, medical students prefer certain subspecialties, especially musculoskeletal, body, and breast imaging. Women expressed significantly stronger interest in breast imaging and pediatric radiology, while men indicated significantly stronger interest in body imaging, neuroradiology, and nuclear medicine.

医学生在担任核心职员之前对放射学子专业的看法。
理由和目标:放射学在美国医学院临床课程中的代表性仍然不足,对该领域的先入为主的看法可能会影响学生是否进行选择性暴露。一所学术机构的核心放射学书记员提供了一个机会来评估学生对不同放射学子专业的早期偏好,从而为课程设计提供信息并激励学生招聘。材料和方法:在一所对抗疗法医学院,在第二年进行的为期四周的临床放射科书记员培训包括在两个亚专业进行为期一周的沉浸式体验。在担任书记员之前,学生们通过在八个领域分配100分来对他们的沉浸式偏好进行排名,并将其值作为兴趣的代表进行分析。一项二级调查被分发给了活跃的一年级和二年级医学生,以进一步调查吸引他们学习放射学的因素。结果:最喜欢肌肉骨骼、身体和乳房成像的沉浸式体验,分别有41.6%、34.3%和31.9%的学生获得≥20分。女性比男性更有可能对乳腺成像(35.8%对24.8%,p=0.037)和儿科放射学(28.8%对12.8%,p=0.001)表示兴趣。男性比女性更有可能更喜欢身体成像(41.9%对30.2%,p=0.034)、神经放射学(29.1%对19.5%,p=0.048),和核医学(11.1%对5.1%,p=0.044)。结论:在临床教育的早期,医学生更喜欢某些亚专业,尤其是肌肉骨骼、身体和乳房成像。女性对乳腺成像和儿科放射学表现出更强烈的兴趣,而男性对身体成像、神经放射学和核医学表现出更浓厚的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
113
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology covers important and controversial topics in radiology. Each issue presents important viewpoints from leading radiologists. High-quality reproductions of radiographs, CT scans, MR images, and sonograms clearly depict what is being described in each article. Also included are valuable updates relevant to other areas of practice, such as medical-legal issues or archiving systems. With new multi-topic format and image-intensive style, Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology offers an outstanding, time-saving investigation into current topics most relevant to radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信