{"title":"Ben Jonson's Head","authors":"J. Masten","doi":"10.1093/nq/s6-ii.30.75d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I'M TRYING TO IMAGINE what it might mean to buy a book \"at the Ben Johnson's Head in Thredneedle-street\" in 1656. I stumble upon this shop sign in reading a list of plays available in print--a list published at the end of The Old Law, a play attributed on its title page to Middleton, Rowley, and Massinger. Advertised as \"An Exact and perfect CATALOGUE of all the PLAIES that were ever printed; together, with all the Authors names; and what are Comedies, Histories, and Interludes, Masks, Pastorels, Tragedies,\"(1) and running to sixteen pages and 622 titles, this list groups plays alphabetically by title and includes a column noting the genre of each play--comedy, tragedy, interlude, masque--by abbreviation (C, T, I, M), and a column that sometimes attributes authorship. \"All these Plaies,\" the catalogue promises, \"you may either have at the Signe of the Adam and Eve, in Little Britain; or, at the Ben Johnson's Head in Thredneedle-street, over against the Exchange.\"(2) The Jonson's Head was the sign for Robert Pollard's shop from 1655 until at least 1658;(3) a later list, published in 1661 by Francis Kirkman, advertises as one of its locations for the buying and selling of plays \"the John Fletchers Head.\"(4) I want to ask what it means to place a playwright's head on a shop sign--to sell under its sign, or to read it, in an advertisement or in the street. What kind of sign do these head signs represent? Part of an answer lies in the formatting of the play catalogues themselves. As they emerge in the 1650s, '60s, and '70s, the catalogues seem to me to trace the rising (though still tentative) importance of authorship as a visible category for organizing printed drama. To the extent that they engage authorship (and they do so to different degrees), the catalogues seem not as interested in consistency with even the other available printed attributions as they are in promoting a growing interest in plays associated with recognizable names.(5) The first extant list, published with The Careless Sheperdes in 1656, is organized to facilitate locating plays alphabetically by title, with occasional authorial identifications following in italics. There is no separate column for authors.(6) The Old Law catalogue likewise lists plays alphabetically by title, with a column for genre, and then a column with more frequent notation of authorship in italics.(7) A 1661 list--Francis Kirkman's initial effort, published in an old interlude--places an author column first (\"Names of the Authors\"), but continues to arrange/group the plays alphabetically by title (\"Names of the Playes\").(8) In the layout of Kirkman's page, authorship is thus marked more prominently than in the earlier catalogues, but title remains the organizing principle. Kirkman's second list, published with a translation of Corneille's Nicomede in 1671, uses the same column arrangement, but in its \"Advertisement to the Reader,\" the publisher bestows great attention on what he calls \"the placing of names,\" which system he presents as an innovation.(9) Kirkman explains that in the 1671 catalogue he has grouped the plays of the most prolific playwrights together at the beginning of each letter in the alphabetical list of titles: Although I took care and pains in my last Catalogue to place the Names in some methodical manner, yet I have now proceeded further in a better method, having thus placed them. First, I begin with Shakespear, who hath in all written forty eight. Then Beaumont and Fletcher fifty two, Johnson fifty, Shirley thirty eight, Heywood twenty five, Middleton and Rowley twenty seven, Massenger sixteen, Chapman seventeen, Brome seventeen, and D'Avenant fourteen; so that these ten have written in all, 304. The rest have every one written under ten in number, and therefore I pass them as they were in the old Catalogue.(10) Kirkman's system is a significant innovation in the emergence of the dramatic author as a category: at the moment of an emergent bibliophilic culture interested in the collection of printed drama,(11) he becomes absorbed in discovering/producing authors who have a discernible, definable corpus--writers whose plays can be grouped. …","PeriodicalId":39628,"journal":{"name":"Shakespeare Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/nq/s6-ii.30.75d","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shakespeare Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nq/s6-ii.30.75d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
I'M TRYING TO IMAGINE what it might mean to buy a book "at the Ben Johnson's Head in Thredneedle-street" in 1656. I stumble upon this shop sign in reading a list of plays available in print--a list published at the end of The Old Law, a play attributed on its title page to Middleton, Rowley, and Massinger. Advertised as "An Exact and perfect CATALOGUE of all the PLAIES that were ever printed; together, with all the Authors names; and what are Comedies, Histories, and Interludes, Masks, Pastorels, Tragedies,"(1) and running to sixteen pages and 622 titles, this list groups plays alphabetically by title and includes a column noting the genre of each play--comedy, tragedy, interlude, masque--by abbreviation (C, T, I, M), and a column that sometimes attributes authorship. "All these Plaies," the catalogue promises, "you may either have at the Signe of the Adam and Eve, in Little Britain; or, at the Ben Johnson's Head in Thredneedle-street, over against the Exchange."(2) The Jonson's Head was the sign for Robert Pollard's shop from 1655 until at least 1658;(3) a later list, published in 1661 by Francis Kirkman, advertises as one of its locations for the buying and selling of plays "the John Fletchers Head."(4) I want to ask what it means to place a playwright's head on a shop sign--to sell under its sign, or to read it, in an advertisement or in the street. What kind of sign do these head signs represent? Part of an answer lies in the formatting of the play catalogues themselves. As they emerge in the 1650s, '60s, and '70s, the catalogues seem to me to trace the rising (though still tentative) importance of authorship as a visible category for organizing printed drama. To the extent that they engage authorship (and they do so to different degrees), the catalogues seem not as interested in consistency with even the other available printed attributions as they are in promoting a growing interest in plays associated with recognizable names.(5) The first extant list, published with The Careless Sheperdes in 1656, is organized to facilitate locating plays alphabetically by title, with occasional authorial identifications following in italics. There is no separate column for authors.(6) The Old Law catalogue likewise lists plays alphabetically by title, with a column for genre, and then a column with more frequent notation of authorship in italics.(7) A 1661 list--Francis Kirkman's initial effort, published in an old interlude--places an author column first ("Names of the Authors"), but continues to arrange/group the plays alphabetically by title ("Names of the Playes").(8) In the layout of Kirkman's page, authorship is thus marked more prominently than in the earlier catalogues, but title remains the organizing principle. Kirkman's second list, published with a translation of Corneille's Nicomede in 1671, uses the same column arrangement, but in its "Advertisement to the Reader," the publisher bestows great attention on what he calls "the placing of names," which system he presents as an innovation.(9) Kirkman explains that in the 1671 catalogue he has grouped the plays of the most prolific playwrights together at the beginning of each letter in the alphabetical list of titles: Although I took care and pains in my last Catalogue to place the Names in some methodical manner, yet I have now proceeded further in a better method, having thus placed them. First, I begin with Shakespear, who hath in all written forty eight. Then Beaumont and Fletcher fifty two, Johnson fifty, Shirley thirty eight, Heywood twenty five, Middleton and Rowley twenty seven, Massenger sixteen, Chapman seventeen, Brome seventeen, and D'Avenant fourteen; so that these ten have written in all, 304. The rest have every one written under ten in number, and therefore I pass them as they were in the old Catalogue.(10) Kirkman's system is a significant innovation in the emergence of the dramatic author as a category: at the moment of an emergent bibliophilic culture interested in the collection of printed drama,(11) he becomes absorbed in discovering/producing authors who have a discernible, definable corpus--writers whose plays can be grouped. …
我试着想象1656年“在针街的本·约翰逊书店”买一本书可能意味着什么。我是在阅读一份已出版的戏剧清单时偶然发现这个招牌的——这份清单发表在《旧法》(the Old Law)的末尾,该剧的扉页上注明作者是米德尔顿、罗利和马辛格。广告上写着“所有已印刷的戏剧的精确而完美的目录;连同所有作者的姓名;以及什么是喜剧、历史、插曲、假面剧、杂耍剧、悲剧”(1)。这个列表有16页,622个标题,按照标题的字母顺序排列,包括一栏,用缩写(C, T, I, M)标出每部戏剧的类型——喜剧、悲剧、插曲、假面剧,还有一栏有时注明作者。“所有这些戏剧,”目录上写道,“你可以在小不列颠的亚当和夏娃的标志处找到;或者,在Thredneedle-street本·约翰逊的头,对著交换。”(2)琼森的头是罗伯特·波拉德的商店的标志从1655年至少到1658年;(3)后面的列表,弗朗西斯教徒在1661年出版,广告作为它的一个位置的买卖扮演“约翰·弗莱彻头”。(4)我想问意味着什么地方一个剧作家的头在店铺招牌——出售其符号,或阅读它,在一个广告或者在街上。这些头部的标志代表什么?部分答案在于戏剧目录本身的格式。在17世纪50年代、60年代和70年代出现的目录,在我看来,似乎追溯了作者身份作为组织印刷戏剧的可见类别的重要性日益上升(尽管仍是尝试性的)。在某种程度上,它们涉及作者身份(它们在不同程度上这样做),目录似乎对与其他可用的印刷署名的一致性不感兴趣,他们更感兴趣的是促进人们对与可识别的名字有关的戏剧的日益增长的兴趣。(5)第一个现存的目录是在1656年与《漫不经心的谢泼德斯》一起出版的,它的组织是为了方便按标题字母顺序定位戏剧,偶尔作者身份以斜体显示。(6)旧法目录同样按标题字母顺序列出戏剧,其中一栏为类型,然后一栏用斜体字更频繁地标记作者。(7)1661年的列表-弗朗西斯·柯克曼最初的努力,发表在一个旧的插曲中-将作者列在首位(“作者的名字”),但继续按标题字母顺序排列/分组(“剧本的名字”)。作者身份因此被标记更突出比在早期的目录,但标题仍然是组织原则。柯克曼的第二份目录是在1671年出版的,与高乃依的《尼科米德》的翻译一起出版,使用了相同的列排列,但在“给读者的广告”中,出版商非常关注他所谓的“名字的排列”,他认为这种系统是一种创新。(9)柯克曼解释说,在1671年的目录中,他把最多产的剧作家的剧本按字母顺序排列在每个字母的开头:虽然我在上一份目录中煞费苦心地有条不紊地列出了这些名字,但现在我又采取了一种更好的方法,这样列出了这些名字。首先,我要从莎士比亚说起,他总共写了48部作品。然后是博蒙特和弗莱彻五十二岁,约翰逊五十岁,雪莉三十八岁,海伍德二十五岁,米德尔顿和罗利二十七岁,马森格十六岁,查普曼十七岁,布罗梅十七岁,达文南十四岁;这样,这十个人一共写了304篇。其余的都是少于10的作品,因此我把它们当作旧目录中的作品。(10)柯克曼的系统是戏剧作者作为一个类别出现的一个重大创新:在一个对印刷戏剧收藏感兴趣的新兴的爱书文化的时刻,(11)他开始专注于发现/生产具有可识别的、可定义的语库的作者——他们的剧本可以分组的作家。...
期刊介绍:
Shakespeare Studies is an international volume published every year in hard cover, containing essays and studies by critics and cultural historians from both hemispheres. It includes substantial reviews of significant books and essays dealing with the cultural history of early modern England, as well as the place of Shakespeare"s productions—and those of his contemporaries—within it. Volume XXXII continues the second in a series of essays on "Early Modern Drama around the World" in which specialists in theatrical traditions from around the globe during the time of Shakespeare discuss the state of scholarly study in their respective areas.