Effects of soil mitigation on lawn-dwelling invertebrates following residential development

Q2 Social Sciences
Matthew A. Borden, Nicole D. Benda, E. Bean, Adam G Dale
{"title":"Effects of soil mitigation on lawn-dwelling invertebrates following residential development","authors":"Matthew A. Borden, Nicole D. Benda, E. Bean, Adam G Dale","doi":"10.1093/jue/juac025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Residential areas are the most rapidly expanding land use type in the southeastern USA. Residential development impairs soil functions primarily through compaction and the removal or burial of topsoil and natural vegetation, which reduces water infiltration and retention, root penetration, and plant establishment. Plant stress reduces plant-derived ecosystem services and increases vulnerability to pests, often leading to supplemental management inputs in the form of irrigation, fertilizers, pesticides and labor. Soil-dwelling invertebrates, including detritivores and natural enemies of pests, drive valuable ecosystem functions that facilitate plant establishment and reduce maintenance inputs. Although poorly understood, soil disturbance during residential development likely disturbs these communities and reduces the services provided by soil-dwelling invertebrates. Here, we compare the effects of two soil compaction mitigation techniques, tillage with and without compost incorporation, on invertebrate communities and the services they provide over 2 years following residential development. We focus on the relationships between detritivores and detritus decomposition rates, entomopathogenic nematodes and the activity density of a key turfgrass pest and other arthropod herbivores and predators. We found that soil mitigation had no detectable benefit for epigeal arthropods within 1 year after disturbance, but that compost-amended soils supported greater arthropod richness and predator activity density than unmitigated soils in the second year after disturbance. In contrast, we found reduced insect-parasitic nematode activity associated with compost amendment. All taxa increased in abundance with time after development. These results can inform more sustainable residential development and landscape maintenance practices for more biodiverse and functional urban and residential ecosystems.","PeriodicalId":37022,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Ecology","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jue/juac025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Residential areas are the most rapidly expanding land use type in the southeastern USA. Residential development impairs soil functions primarily through compaction and the removal or burial of topsoil and natural vegetation, which reduces water infiltration and retention, root penetration, and plant establishment. Plant stress reduces plant-derived ecosystem services and increases vulnerability to pests, often leading to supplemental management inputs in the form of irrigation, fertilizers, pesticides and labor. Soil-dwelling invertebrates, including detritivores and natural enemies of pests, drive valuable ecosystem functions that facilitate plant establishment and reduce maintenance inputs. Although poorly understood, soil disturbance during residential development likely disturbs these communities and reduces the services provided by soil-dwelling invertebrates. Here, we compare the effects of two soil compaction mitigation techniques, tillage with and without compost incorporation, on invertebrate communities and the services they provide over 2 years following residential development. We focus on the relationships between detritivores and detritus decomposition rates, entomopathogenic nematodes and the activity density of a key turfgrass pest and other arthropod herbivores and predators. We found that soil mitigation had no detectable benefit for epigeal arthropods within 1 year after disturbance, but that compost-amended soils supported greater arthropod richness and predator activity density than unmitigated soils in the second year after disturbance. In contrast, we found reduced insect-parasitic nematode activity associated with compost amendment. All taxa increased in abundance with time after development. These results can inform more sustainable residential development and landscape maintenance practices for more biodiverse and functional urban and residential ecosystems.
住宅开发后土壤缓解对草地无脊椎动物的影响
住宅区是美国东南部扩张最快的土地使用类型。住宅开发主要通过压实、去除或掩埋表土和天然植被来损害土壤功能,从而减少水的渗透和滞留、根系渗透和植物生长。植物胁迫减少了植物衍生的生态系统服务,增加了对害虫的脆弱性,往往导致灌溉、肥料、农药和劳动力等补充管理投入。土栖无脊椎动物,包括食腐动物和害虫的天敌,推动有价值的生态系统功能,促进植物生长并减少维护投入。尽管人们知之甚少,但住宅开发过程中的土壤干扰可能会干扰这些社区,并减少土壤无脊椎动物提供的服务。在这里,我们比较了两种缓解土壤压实的技术,有堆肥和没有堆肥的耕作,对无脊椎动物群落的影响以及它们在住宅开发后2年内提供的服务。我们重点研究了腐殖动物与腐殖分解率、昆虫病原线虫与草坪草主要害虫以及其他节肢动物食草动物和捕食者的活动密度之间的关系。我们发现,土壤缓解在干扰后的1年内对表皮节肢动物没有明显的益处,但在干扰后的第二年,堆肥处理的土壤比未缓解的土壤支持更大的节肢动物丰富度和捕食者活动密度。相比之下,我们发现与堆肥修正相关的昆虫寄生线虫活性降低。各类群的丰度随发育时间的延长而增加。这些结果可以为更具生物多样性和功能性的城市和住宅生态系统提供更可持续的住宅开发和景观维护实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Urban Ecology
Journal of Urban Ecology Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信