Avian community composition, but not richness, differs between urban and exurban parks

Q2 Social Sciences
A. Haas, Sara M. Kross, J. Kneitel
{"title":"Avian community composition, but not richness, differs between urban and exurban parks","authors":"A. Haas, Sara M. Kross, J. Kneitel","doi":"10.1093/jue/juaa028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urban development alters landscape structure and available resources, potentially threatening avian diversity worldwide. However, it is unclear how bird communities respond in areas currently undergoing urban development, particularly in the non-breeding season. We examined avian communities at 8 parks in urban (within established urban matrix; >50% built cover) and 9 parks in exurban (within adjacent grassland; 5–20% built cover) areas in Sacramento County, CA. We measured bird species and abundance, conducting five line-transect surveys per park (85 total). We investigated factors influencing avian assemblage, including local habitat features (land cover, number of trees, fruiting trees and tree species, tree height and diameter at breast height, park size, park age), and landscape features (land cover within 500 m and distance to riparian habitat). Fifty bird species, including 15 migrants, were observed. Total species richness and abundance at urban and exurban parks was not significantly different, but community assemblages differed significantly. Park area positively predicted species richness. Abundance was negatively associated with inpark percent built cover, average number of fruiting trees and landscape-scale percent water cover. Species composition changes were associated with distance to riparian habitat and landscape percent grass cover for all but one exurban park; and with tree height, DBH and park and landscape percent tree cover for urban parks. The expansion of exurban areas in many parts of the world poses a significant risk for natural habitat loss. Parks in such areas should be planned to harbor some of the displaced biodiversity.","PeriodicalId":37022,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Ecology","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/jue/juaa028","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jue/juaa028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Urban development alters landscape structure and available resources, potentially threatening avian diversity worldwide. However, it is unclear how bird communities respond in areas currently undergoing urban development, particularly in the non-breeding season. We examined avian communities at 8 parks in urban (within established urban matrix; >50% built cover) and 9 parks in exurban (within adjacent grassland; 5–20% built cover) areas in Sacramento County, CA. We measured bird species and abundance, conducting five line-transect surveys per park (85 total). We investigated factors influencing avian assemblage, including local habitat features (land cover, number of trees, fruiting trees and tree species, tree height and diameter at breast height, park size, park age), and landscape features (land cover within 500 m and distance to riparian habitat). Fifty bird species, including 15 migrants, were observed. Total species richness and abundance at urban and exurban parks was not significantly different, but community assemblages differed significantly. Park area positively predicted species richness. Abundance was negatively associated with inpark percent built cover, average number of fruiting trees and landscape-scale percent water cover. Species composition changes were associated with distance to riparian habitat and landscape percent grass cover for all but one exurban park; and with tree height, DBH and park and landscape percent tree cover for urban parks. The expansion of exurban areas in many parts of the world poses a significant risk for natural habitat loss. Parks in such areas should be planned to harbor some of the displaced biodiversity.
鸟类群落组成与丰富度在城市公园与远郊公园之间存在差异
城市发展改变了景观结构和可利用资源,潜在地威胁着世界范围内的鸟类多样性。然而,目前尚不清楚鸟类群落如何应对目前正在进行城市发展的地区,特别是在非繁殖季节。我们研究了8个城市公园的鸟类群落(在既定的城市矩阵内);bbb50 50%建筑覆盖)和9个公园在郊区(在邻近的草地;我们测量了鸟类的种类和丰度,每个公园进行了5次样线调查(总共85次)。研究了影响鸟类聚集的因素,包括当地栖息地特征(土地覆盖、树木数量、果树和树种、树高和胸径、公园大小、公园年龄)和景观特征(500 m范围内的土地覆盖和与河岸栖息地的距离)。共观察到50种鸟类,其中包括15种候鸟。城市和近郊公园的物种总丰富度和丰度差异不显著,但群落组合差异显著。公园面积正预测物种丰富度。丰度与公园内建筑盖度百分比、平均果树数和景观尺度水盖度百分比呈负相关。物种组成变化与滨岸生境距离和景观草盖度有关;以及城市公园的树高、胸径、公园和景观树木覆盖率。在世界许多地方,远郊地区的扩张对自然栖息地的丧失构成了重大风险。应该在这些地区规划公园,以庇护一些流离失所的生物多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Urban Ecology
Journal of Urban Ecology Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信