Perceptions of fishermen towards marine protected areas in Cambodia and the Philippines

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
M. Hamilton
{"title":"Perceptions of fishermen towards marine protected areas in Cambodia and the Philippines","authors":"M. Hamilton","doi":"10.1093/BIOHORIZONS/HZS007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Marine protected areas (MPAs) can be used to conserve parts of marine ecosystems, including fish stocks exploited by fisheries. Social acceptance of MPAs must be achieved if they are to function as effective management tools. Artisanal fishers operating around tropical coral reef areas were questioned in an attempt to investigate their acceptance and perceptions of MPAs. Fishers from two areas were surveyed: Koh Rong Island, Cambodia, where MPAs are a new concept to fishers, and Southern Leyte, the Philippines, where MPAs have been used in management for over 10 years. Fishers’ opinions of MPAs from each study site were compared and variables affecting fishers’ opinions of MPAs were also investigated at each site. Although small sample sizes of fishers were observed at each study site, results showed that the majority of fishers at each site accepted MPAs as a management tool. Cambodian fishers felt the state of marine resources had worsened in the past decade (with regards to the number of fish, the size of fish and the number of species present in their catch), whereas most Filipino fishers had noticed an opposite trend. Older Cambodian fishers had greater acceptance of MPAs; age did not affect Filipino fishers’ acceptance, and did not affect any other opinions fishers had of MPAs at either site. Community-based management of MPAs was fishers’ preference at both sites. The study shows evidence of MPA support in Cambodia, with mobile gear users being more willing to be involved in MPA management. Most Filipino fishers felt that their MPA improved their catches, although there was evidence of conflict between fishers since the MPA was implemented.","PeriodicalId":52095,"journal":{"name":"Bioscience Horizons","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/BIOHORIZONS/HZS007","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioscience Horizons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/BIOHORIZONS/HZS007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Marine protected areas (MPAs) can be used to conserve parts of marine ecosystems, including fish stocks exploited by fisheries. Social acceptance of MPAs must be achieved if they are to function as effective management tools. Artisanal fishers operating around tropical coral reef areas were questioned in an attempt to investigate their acceptance and perceptions of MPAs. Fishers from two areas were surveyed: Koh Rong Island, Cambodia, where MPAs are a new concept to fishers, and Southern Leyte, the Philippines, where MPAs have been used in management for over 10 years. Fishers’ opinions of MPAs from each study site were compared and variables affecting fishers’ opinions of MPAs were also investigated at each site. Although small sample sizes of fishers were observed at each study site, results showed that the majority of fishers at each site accepted MPAs as a management tool. Cambodian fishers felt the state of marine resources had worsened in the past decade (with regards to the number of fish, the size of fish and the number of species present in their catch), whereas most Filipino fishers had noticed an opposite trend. Older Cambodian fishers had greater acceptance of MPAs; age did not affect Filipino fishers’ acceptance, and did not affect any other opinions fishers had of MPAs at either site. Community-based management of MPAs was fishers’ preference at both sites. The study shows evidence of MPA support in Cambodia, with mobile gear users being more willing to be involved in MPA management. Most Filipino fishers felt that their MPA improved their catches, although there was evidence of conflict between fishers since the MPA was implemented.
渔民对柬埔寨和菲律宾海洋保护区的看法
海洋保护区(MPAs)可用于保护部分海洋生态系统,包括渔业利用的鱼类资源。要使海洋保护区成为有效的管理工具,就必须使社会接受它们。对在热带珊瑚礁附近作业的个体渔民进行了询问,试图调查他们对海洋保护区的接受程度和看法。对来自两个地区的渔民进行了调查:柬埔寨的Koh Rong岛,在那里海洋保护区对渔民来说是一个新概念;菲律宾的南莱特岛,海洋保护区在管理中已经使用了10多年。比较了各研究地点渔民对海洋保护区的看法,并调查了各研究地点影响渔民对海洋保护区看法的变量。虽然在每个研究地点观察到的渔民样本量很小,但结果表明,每个地点的大多数渔民都接受海洋保护区作为一种管理工具。柬埔寨渔民认为海洋资源的状况在过去十年中有所恶化(就鱼的数量、鱼的大小和渔获物的种类数目而言),而大多数菲律宾渔民则注意到相反的趋势。年长的柬埔寨渔民对海洋保护区的接受程度更高;年龄不影响菲律宾渔民的接受程度,也不影响渔民对两个地点的海洋保护区的任何其他意见。两个地点的渔民都倾向于以社区为基础的海洋保护区管理。该研究显示了柬埔寨MPA支持的证据,移动设备用户更愿意参与MPA管理。大多数菲律宾渔民认为,海洋保护区改善了他们的渔获量,尽管有证据表明,自从海洋保护区实施以来,渔民之间发生了冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bioscience Horizons
Bioscience Horizons Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信