Concept of mind in non-human primates

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
S. Towner
{"title":"Concept of mind in non-human primates","authors":"S. Towner","doi":"10.1093/BIOHORIZONS/HZQ011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research concerning animal cognition explores the abilities and capacity of animals to perceive, think and conceive. As an extension of this, researchers have tried to ascertain the concept of animal minds. The field has been a matter of great debate as it has brought into question the uniqueness of the human mind. This dissertation will review the various areas of research that have contributed to our understanding of animal minds, with a specific focus on non-human primates. The term ‘theory of mind’ was originally proposed by Premack and Woodruff in 1978. The ability entails a recognition and understanding of another’s mental states. Recently, this term has included the cognition of seeing. Throughout this article, the important distinction between theory of mind capabilities and complex behavioural analysis is emphasized. It is important to consider how various primates represent entities in their environment, including their own image. In particular reference to this latter point, self-recognition could act as a first step towards understanding others. With this ability, other individuals may then be understood and manipulated through deception, imitation and teaching. In addition to deception, pretend play and external representation are proposed as another dimension of understanding false representations. Decisions about the evolutionary point at which theory of mind may have developed will depend on interpretations of the evidence for these abilities in non-human primates and whether indeed theory of mind is underlying them. Since the conception of the term ‘theory of mind’, the issue may have evolved beyond whether or not there is theory of mind in non-human primates to a more sophisticated appreciation that the concept of mind has many facets and some of these may exist in non-human primates while others may not.","PeriodicalId":52095,"journal":{"name":"Bioscience Horizons","volume":"3 1","pages":"96-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/BIOHORIZONS/HZQ011","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioscience Horizons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/BIOHORIZONS/HZQ011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Research concerning animal cognition explores the abilities and capacity of animals to perceive, think and conceive. As an extension of this, researchers have tried to ascertain the concept of animal minds. The field has been a matter of great debate as it has brought into question the uniqueness of the human mind. This dissertation will review the various areas of research that have contributed to our understanding of animal minds, with a specific focus on non-human primates. The term ‘theory of mind’ was originally proposed by Premack and Woodruff in 1978. The ability entails a recognition and understanding of another’s mental states. Recently, this term has included the cognition of seeing. Throughout this article, the important distinction between theory of mind capabilities and complex behavioural analysis is emphasized. It is important to consider how various primates represent entities in their environment, including their own image. In particular reference to this latter point, self-recognition could act as a first step towards understanding others. With this ability, other individuals may then be understood and manipulated through deception, imitation and teaching. In addition to deception, pretend play and external representation are proposed as another dimension of understanding false representations. Decisions about the evolutionary point at which theory of mind may have developed will depend on interpretations of the evidence for these abilities in non-human primates and whether indeed theory of mind is underlying them. Since the conception of the term ‘theory of mind’, the issue may have evolved beyond whether or not there is theory of mind in non-human primates to a more sophisticated appreciation that the concept of mind has many facets and some of these may exist in non-human primates while others may not.
非人类灵长类动物的心智概念
关于动物认知的研究探讨了动物感知、思考和怀孕的能力。作为这一研究的延伸,研究人员试图确定动物心灵的概念。这一领域一直存在着激烈的争论,因为它对人类思维的独特性提出了质疑。这篇论文将回顾各个领域的研究,这些研究有助于我们理解动物的思想,特别关注非人类灵长类动物。“心智理论”一词最初是由Premack和Woodruff在1978年提出的。这种能力需要识别和理解他人的精神状态。最近,这个术语还包括了对视觉的认知。在这篇文章中,心理能力理论和复杂行为分析之间的重要区别被强调。重要的是要考虑各种灵长类动物如何表示环境中的实体,包括它们自己的形象。特别是关于后一点,自我认识可以作为理解他人的第一步。有了这种能力,其他人就可以通过欺骗、模仿和教学来理解和操纵。除了欺骗,假装游戏和外部表征被认为是理解虚假表征的另一个维度。关于心智理论可能发展的进化点的决定将取决于对非人类灵长类动物这些能力的证据的解释,以及心智理论是否确实是它们的基础。自从“心智理论”一词出现以来,这个问题可能已经超越了在非人类灵长类动物中是否存在心智理论,而发展到一个更复杂的认识,即心智概念有许多方面,其中一些可能存在于非人类灵长类动物中,而另一些可能不存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bioscience Horizons
Bioscience Horizons Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信