Kingdom Animalia: the zoological malaise from a microbial perspective.

L. Margulis
{"title":"Kingdom Animalia: the zoological malaise from a microbial perspective.","authors":"L. Margulis","doi":"10.1093/ICB/30.4.861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pain and cognitive dissonance abounds amongst biologists: the plant-animal, botany-zoology wound has nearly healed and the new gash--revealed by department and budget reorganizations--is \"molecular\" vs. \"organismic\" biology. Here I contend that resolution of these tensions within zoology requires that an autopoietic-gaian view replace a mechanical-neodarwinian perspective; in the interest of brevity and since many points have been discussed elsewhere, rather than develop detailed arguments I must make staccato statements and refer to a burgeoning literature. The first central concept is that animals, all organisms developing from blastular embryos, evolved from single protist cells that were unable to reproduce their undulipodia. The second points to the usefulness of recognizing the analogy between cyclically established symbioses and meiotic sexuality.","PeriodicalId":78013,"journal":{"name":"American zoologist","volume":"30 1","pages":"861-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/ICB/30.4.861","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American zoologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ICB/30.4.861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

Pain and cognitive dissonance abounds amongst biologists: the plant-animal, botany-zoology wound has nearly healed and the new gash--revealed by department and budget reorganizations--is "molecular" vs. "organismic" biology. Here I contend that resolution of these tensions within zoology requires that an autopoietic-gaian view replace a mechanical-neodarwinian perspective; in the interest of brevity and since many points have been discussed elsewhere, rather than develop detailed arguments I must make staccato statements and refer to a burgeoning literature. The first central concept is that animals, all organisms developing from blastular embryos, evolved from single protist cells that were unable to reproduce their undulipodia. The second points to the usefulness of recognizing the analogy between cyclically established symbioses and meiotic sexuality.
动物王国:从微生物的角度看动物学的萎靡。
痛苦和认知失调在生物学家中比比皆是:植物-动物,植物-动物的伤口几乎愈合了,新的伤口——部门和预算重组——是“分子”vs。“机体”生物学。在这里,我认为,解决动物学内部的这些紧张关系需要一种自创生论的观点来取代机械-新达尔文主义的观点;为了简洁起见,而且由于许多观点已经在其他地方讨论过,我必须断断续续地陈述,并参考新兴的文献,而不是展开详细的论点。第一个中心概念是动物,所有从囊胚胚胎发育而来的生物,都是从单个原生细胞进化而来的,这些原生细胞无法繁殖出它们的波足。第二点指出,认识到循环建立的共生体和减数分裂性之间的类比是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信