Artificial neural network model to predict biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.

C. Porter, C. O’Donnell, E. Crawford, E. Gamito, A. Errejon, E. Genega, T. Sotelo, A. Tewari
{"title":"Artificial neural network model to predict biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.","authors":"C. Porter, C. O’Donnell, E. Crawford, E. Gamito, A. Errejon, E. Genega, T. Sotelo, A. Tewari","doi":"10.1089/10915360152745830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND Biochemical failure, defined here as a rise in the serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) concentration to >0.3 ng/mL or the initiation of adjuvant therapy, is thought to be an adverse prognostic factor for men who undergo radical prostatectomy (RP) as definitive treatment for clinically localized cancer of the prostate (CAP). We have developed an artificial neural network (ANN) to predict biochemical failure that may benefit clinicians and patients choosing among the definitive treatment options for CAP. MATERIALS AND METHODS Clinical and pathologic data from 196 patients who had undergone RP at one institution between 1988 and 1999 were utilized. Twenty-one records were deleted because of missing outcome, Gleason sum, PSA, or clinical stage data. The variables from the 175 remaining records were analyzed for input variable selection using principal component analysis, decision tree analysis, and stepped logistic regression. The selected variables were age, PSA, primary and secondary Gleason grade, and Gleason sum. The records were randomized and split into three bootstrap training and validation sets of 140 records (80%) and 35 records (20%), respectively. RESULTS Forty-four percent of the patients suffered biochemical failure. The average duration of follow up was 2.5 years (range 0-11.5 years). Forty-two percent of the patients had pathologic evidence of non-organ-confined disease. The average area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve for the validation sets was 0.75 +/- 0.07. The ANN with the highest area under the ROC curve (0.80) was used for prediction and had a sensitivity of 0.74, a specificity of 0.78, a positive predictive value of 0.71, and a negative predictive value of 0.81. CONCLUSION These results suggest that ANN models can predict PSA failure using readily available preoperative variables. Such predictive models may offer assistance to patients and physicians deciding on definitive therapy for CaP.","PeriodicalId":80296,"journal":{"name":"Molecular urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/10915360152745830","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/10915360152745830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

BACKGROUND Biochemical failure, defined here as a rise in the serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) concentration to >0.3 ng/mL or the initiation of adjuvant therapy, is thought to be an adverse prognostic factor for men who undergo radical prostatectomy (RP) as definitive treatment for clinically localized cancer of the prostate (CAP). We have developed an artificial neural network (ANN) to predict biochemical failure that may benefit clinicians and patients choosing among the definitive treatment options for CAP. MATERIALS AND METHODS Clinical and pathologic data from 196 patients who had undergone RP at one institution between 1988 and 1999 were utilized. Twenty-one records were deleted because of missing outcome, Gleason sum, PSA, or clinical stage data. The variables from the 175 remaining records were analyzed for input variable selection using principal component analysis, decision tree analysis, and stepped logistic regression. The selected variables were age, PSA, primary and secondary Gleason grade, and Gleason sum. The records were randomized and split into three bootstrap training and validation sets of 140 records (80%) and 35 records (20%), respectively. RESULTS Forty-four percent of the patients suffered biochemical failure. The average duration of follow up was 2.5 years (range 0-11.5 years). Forty-two percent of the patients had pathologic evidence of non-organ-confined disease. The average area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve for the validation sets was 0.75 +/- 0.07. The ANN with the highest area under the ROC curve (0.80) was used for prediction and had a sensitivity of 0.74, a specificity of 0.78, a positive predictive value of 0.71, and a negative predictive value of 0.81. CONCLUSION These results suggest that ANN models can predict PSA failure using readily available preoperative variables. Such predictive models may offer assistance to patients and physicians deciding on definitive therapy for CaP.
人工神经网络模型预测根治性前列腺切除术后生化失败。
生化失败,在这里被定义为血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)浓度升高至bb0 0.3 ng/mL或开始辅助治疗,被认为是接受根治性前列腺切除术(RP)作为临床局限性前列腺癌(CAP)的最终治疗的男性的不良预后因素。我们开发了一种人工神经网络(ANN)来预测生化失败,这可能有利于临床医生和患者在cap的最终治疗方案中做出选择。材料和方法我们利用了1988年至1999年间在一家机构接受RP的196名患者的临床和病理数据。21条记录因缺少结局、Gleason sum、PSA或临床分期数据而被删除。使用主成分分析、决策树分析和阶梯式逻辑回归对175个剩余记录中的变量进行分析,以选择输入变量。选取的变量为年龄、PSA、原发性和继发性Gleason分级、Gleason和。记录被随机分成3个bootstrap训练集和验证集,分别有140条记录(80%)和35条记录(20%)。结果44%的患者出现生化功能衰竭。平均随访时间为2.5年(0 ~ 11.5年)。42%的患者有非器官局限性疾病的病理证据。验证集的受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线下的平均面积为0.75±0.07。采用ROC曲线下面积最大的ANN(0.80)进行预测,其敏感性为0.74,特异性为0.78,阳性预测值为0.71,阴性预测值为0.81。结论:这些结果表明,人工神经网络模型可以利用术前可用的变量预测PSA失败。这种预测模型可以帮助患者和医生决定CaP的最终治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信