{"title":"Increased risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty in inflammatory arthritis: a prospective observational study of 410 hips.","authors":"R. Zwartelé, R. Brand, C. Doets","doi":"10.1080/759369228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nIt is unclear whether patients with inflammatory arthritis have a higher risk of dislocation after hip replacement.\n\n\nPATIENTS AND MATERIAL\nWe carried out a prospective study assessing the incidence of dislocation within 2 years after surgery for patients diagnosed with inflammatory arthritis (IA) and osteoarthrosis (OA). One single type of prosthesis was implanted using a lateral approach. Both diagnostic groups were compared by univariate analysis with respect to dislocation, sex, age, diagnosis, prior hip surgery, experience of the surgeon and malposition of the acetabular component. In a multivariate logistic regression approach, the difference in dislocation incidence was assessed after adjusting for the effect of the potential confounders given above. Between 1996 and 1999, 410 THA were performed: 70 in IA and 340 in OA. After 2 years no patients were lost to follow-up, but 12 patients had died, and 5 revisions were carried out for reasons other than dislocation.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe dislocation rate in patients with IA was higher than in patients with OA: 10% (7 hips) in the IA group and 3% (10 hips) in the OA group (p = 0.006). No significant differences were found among the risk factors for dislocation between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that IA is an independent risk factor for dislocation (odds ratio (OR) 3.7, 95% CI 1.3-11), together with malposition of the cup in more than 55 degrees abduction (OR 7.7, CI 2.3-26) and increased anteversion (OR 7.6, CI 1.4-42.4).\n\n\nINTERPRETATION\nOur findings clearly suggest that inflammatory arthritis has to be considered as an independent risk factor for dislocation after primary THA.","PeriodicalId":75403,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica","volume":"75 6 1","pages":"684-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/759369228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26
Abstract
BACKGROUND
It is unclear whether patients with inflammatory arthritis have a higher risk of dislocation after hip replacement.
PATIENTS AND MATERIAL
We carried out a prospective study assessing the incidence of dislocation within 2 years after surgery for patients diagnosed with inflammatory arthritis (IA) and osteoarthrosis (OA). One single type of prosthesis was implanted using a lateral approach. Both diagnostic groups were compared by univariate analysis with respect to dislocation, sex, age, diagnosis, prior hip surgery, experience of the surgeon and malposition of the acetabular component. In a multivariate logistic regression approach, the difference in dislocation incidence was assessed after adjusting for the effect of the potential confounders given above. Between 1996 and 1999, 410 THA were performed: 70 in IA and 340 in OA. After 2 years no patients were lost to follow-up, but 12 patients had died, and 5 revisions were carried out for reasons other than dislocation.
RESULTS
The dislocation rate in patients with IA was higher than in patients with OA: 10% (7 hips) in the IA group and 3% (10 hips) in the OA group (p = 0.006). No significant differences were found among the risk factors for dislocation between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that IA is an independent risk factor for dislocation (odds ratio (OR) 3.7, 95% CI 1.3-11), together with malposition of the cup in more than 55 degrees abduction (OR 7.7, CI 2.3-26) and increased anteversion (OR 7.6, CI 1.4-42.4).
INTERPRETATION
Our findings clearly suggest that inflammatory arthritis has to be considered as an independent risk factor for dislocation after primary THA.
背景:目前尚不清楚炎症性关节炎患者在髋关节置换术后是否有更高的脱位风险。患者和材料我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,评估诊断为炎症性关节炎(IA)和骨关节病(OA)的患者术后2年内脱位的发生率。一种单一类型的假体采用外侧入路植入。两个诊断组通过单因素分析比较脱位、性别、年龄、诊断、既往髋关节手术、外科医生经验和髋臼假体错位。在多元逻辑回归方法中,在调整了上述潜在混杂因素的影响后,评估了脱位发生率的差异。1996年至1999年期间,进行了410例THA: 70例IA, 340例OA。2年后,无患者失访,但有12例患者死亡,5例因脱位以外的原因进行了翻修。结果IA组脱位率高于OA组:IA组为10%(7髋),OA组为3%(10髋),差异有统计学意义(p = 0.006)。两组间发生脱位的危险因素无明显差异。多因素logistic回归分析显示,IA是脱位的独立危险因素(优势比(OR) 3.7, 95% CI 1.3-11),以及超过55度外展时的杯位错位(OR 7.7, CI 2.3-26)和前倾增加(OR 7.6, CI 1.4-42.4)。我们的研究结果清楚地表明,炎性关节炎必须被视为原发性THA后脱位的独立危险因素。