Multi-level preventive care for Type 2 diabetes

K. Aral, S. Chick, Alfons Grabosch
{"title":"Multi-level preventive care for Type 2 diabetes","authors":"K. Aral, S. Chick, Alfons Grabosch","doi":"10.1080/19488300.2015.1060552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) accounts for 4.6 million deaths globally and for 11% of the global health expenditure (IDF, 2012). Several different primary, secondary, and tertiary preventive interventions promise better health outcomes and cost savings. Such interventions are typically studied in isolation. This paper proposes a compartmental mathematical model for T2DM that comprehends the interactions of multiple preventive interventions for various stages of T2DM, population dynamics, and the ensuing levels of clinical indicators, costs and utilities of disease states. We use the model to optimize portfolios of interventions for a multi-level preventive care program (using data from a population with high T2DM prevalence such as the UAE) and give insights about different ways in which interventions can be beneficial (such as for screening or for averting new cases). We demonstrate that the cost effectiveness with a classical discounted net present value perspective does not imply cost effectiveness for long-run planning, and that joint optimization of a portfolio of interventions can have benefits relative to the sequential optimization of interventions individually. Thus, accounting for long-run demographics and the interaction of interventions may be a useful extension to traditional cost-utility analyses when designing preventive care policies.","PeriodicalId":89563,"journal":{"name":"IIE transactions on healthcare systems engineering","volume":"5 1","pages":"165 - 182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19488300.2015.1060552","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IIE transactions on healthcare systems engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19488300.2015.1060552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) accounts for 4.6 million deaths globally and for 11% of the global health expenditure (IDF, 2012). Several different primary, secondary, and tertiary preventive interventions promise better health outcomes and cost savings. Such interventions are typically studied in isolation. This paper proposes a compartmental mathematical model for T2DM that comprehends the interactions of multiple preventive interventions for various stages of T2DM, population dynamics, and the ensuing levels of clinical indicators, costs and utilities of disease states. We use the model to optimize portfolios of interventions for a multi-level preventive care program (using data from a population with high T2DM prevalence such as the UAE) and give insights about different ways in which interventions can be beneficial (such as for screening or for averting new cases). We demonstrate that the cost effectiveness with a classical discounted net present value perspective does not imply cost effectiveness for long-run planning, and that joint optimization of a portfolio of interventions can have benefits relative to the sequential optimization of interventions individually. Thus, accounting for long-run demographics and the interaction of interventions may be a useful extension to traditional cost-utility analyses when designing preventive care policies.
2型糖尿病的多层次预防保健
2型糖尿病(T2DM)在全球造成460万人死亡,占全球卫生支出的11% (IDF, 2012年)。几种不同的初级、二级和三级预防干预措施有望改善健康结果并节省费用。这些干预措施通常是单独研究的。本文提出了T2DM的分区数学模型,该模型涵盖了T2DM不同阶段的多种预防干预措施的相互作用、人口动态以及随后的临床指标水平、疾病状态的成本和效用。我们使用该模型来优化多层次预防保健计划的干预组合(使用来自阿联酋等T2DM高患病率人群的数据),并对干预可能有益的不同方式(例如筛查或避免新病例)提供见解。我们证明了经典的净现值折现视角下的成本效益并不意味着长期规划的成本效益,并且干预组合的联合优化相对于单独干预的顺序优化具有益处。因此,在设计预防保健政策时,考虑长期人口统计和干预措施的相互作用可能是传统成本效用分析的有益延伸。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信