Physiological and descriptive variables as predictors for the Emergency Severity Index

David Claudio, Luciano Ricondo, A. Freivalds, G. O. Okudan Kremer
{"title":"Physiological and descriptive variables as predictors for the Emergency Severity Index","authors":"David Claudio, Luciano Ricondo, A. Freivalds, G. O. Okudan Kremer","doi":"10.1080/19488300.2012.680572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many hospital emergency departments (EDs) in the United States have implemented the use of the five-level Emergency Severity Index (ESI) as their clinical decision support method to enhance clinical decision making in the triage process. The ESI designates the most acutely ill patients as level 1 or 2 and those who do not meet these criteria are assigned to levels 3–5 based on estimated resource utilization. Although the number of resources is the primary decision rule to determine levels 3–5, physiological and descriptive variables can also be used to predict the ESI level. This study uses several physiological and descriptive variables as predictors to determine the ESI value. The physiological variables include heart rate, blood pressure, temperature, respiration rate, and oxygen level, whereas the descriptive variables include age, gender, pain level, and patient complaint. An ordered probit model was developed for ESI prediction. In addition, a linear regression model was also developed to demonstrate the necessity of having a decision making tool that allows for non-integer values. The results of this research can be used to enhance the precision of the ESI and the nurse's ability to prioritize treatment based on triage acuity. The decision making tool can also be used to stratify patients who are classified in the same priority group and may eliminate the necessity of grouping patients into different categories.","PeriodicalId":89563,"journal":{"name":"IIE transactions on healthcare systems engineering","volume":"2 1","pages":"131 - 141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19488300.2012.680572","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IIE transactions on healthcare systems engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19488300.2012.680572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Many hospital emergency departments (EDs) in the United States have implemented the use of the five-level Emergency Severity Index (ESI) as their clinical decision support method to enhance clinical decision making in the triage process. The ESI designates the most acutely ill patients as level 1 or 2 and those who do not meet these criteria are assigned to levels 3–5 based on estimated resource utilization. Although the number of resources is the primary decision rule to determine levels 3–5, physiological and descriptive variables can also be used to predict the ESI level. This study uses several physiological and descriptive variables as predictors to determine the ESI value. The physiological variables include heart rate, blood pressure, temperature, respiration rate, and oxygen level, whereas the descriptive variables include age, gender, pain level, and patient complaint. An ordered probit model was developed for ESI prediction. In addition, a linear regression model was also developed to demonstrate the necessity of having a decision making tool that allows for non-integer values. The results of this research can be used to enhance the precision of the ESI and the nurse's ability to prioritize treatment based on triage acuity. The decision making tool can also be used to stratify patients who are classified in the same priority group and may eliminate the necessity of grouping patients into different categories.
作为紧急程度指数预测因子的生理和描述性变量
美国许多医院急诊科(EDs)已经实施了使用五级急诊严重程度指数(ESI)作为临床决策支持方法,以加强分诊过程中的临床决策。ESI将病情最严重的患者指定为1级或2级,而那些不符合这些标准的患者根据估计的资源利用率被分配到3-5级。虽然资源数量是确定3-5级的主要决策规则,但生理变量和描述性变量也可用于预测ESI水平。本研究使用几个生理和描述性变量作为预测因子来确定ESI值。生理变量包括心率、血压、体温、呼吸频率和含氧量,而描述性变量包括年龄、性别、疼痛程度和患者主诉。建立了ESI预测的有序概率模型。此外,还开发了一个线性回归模型,以证明拥有一个允许非整数值的决策工具的必要性。本研究结果可用于提高ESI的准确性和护士根据分诊敏锐度确定优先治疗的能力。决策工具还可用于对同一优先组的患者进行分层,并可能消除将患者分组为不同类别的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信