Parent-child joint writing in Chinese kindergarteners: Explicit instruction in radical knowledge and stroke writing skills

Q1 Arts and Humanities
S. Lam, C. McBride-Chang
{"title":"Parent-child joint writing in Chinese kindergarteners: Explicit instruction in radical knowledge and stroke writing skills","authors":"S. Lam, C. McBride-Chang","doi":"10.1080/17586801.2013.812532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The present study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of two types of learning, stroke order writing and radical knowledge training, for enhancing children's Chinese literacy skills in the context of parent-child joint Chinese writing. Eighty Hong Kong kindergarteners were pretested on nonverbal IQ, word reading, vocabulary knowledge, semantic-radical awareness tasks, writing dictation and single character reading. Then they were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: stroke training, radical training or control. After eight weeks of training, the radical condition yielded greater improvement compared with the control condition in dictation and semantic-radical awareness tasks. The findings of the study highlight the potential positive effects of parent-child joint writing on children's Chinese language and literacy skills. Findings also demonstrate that parents typically use multiple strategies in parent-child joint writing, and it is likely that different approaches to writing might facilitate literacy knowledge in different ways with development.","PeriodicalId":39225,"journal":{"name":"Writing Systems Research","volume":"5 1","pages":"109 - 88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17586801.2013.812532","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Writing Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.812532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Abstract The present study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of two types of learning, stroke order writing and radical knowledge training, for enhancing children's Chinese literacy skills in the context of parent-child joint Chinese writing. Eighty Hong Kong kindergarteners were pretested on nonverbal IQ, word reading, vocabulary knowledge, semantic-radical awareness tasks, writing dictation and single character reading. Then they were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: stroke training, radical training or control. After eight weeks of training, the radical condition yielded greater improvement compared with the control condition in dictation and semantic-radical awareness tasks. The findings of the study highlight the potential positive effects of parent-child joint writing on children's Chinese language and literacy skills. Findings also demonstrate that parents typically use multiple strategies in parent-child joint writing, and it is likely that different approaches to writing might facilitate literacy knowledge in different ways with development.
中国幼儿园幼儿亲子联合写作:激进知识与笔画技巧的显性教学
摘要本研究旨在探讨笔画顺序书写和激进知识训练两种学习方式在亲子联合写作背景下提高儿童汉语读写能力的效果。对80名香港幼稚园儿童进行了非语言智商、单词阅读、词汇知识、语义激进意识任务、写作听写和单字阅读的预测。然后,他们被随机分配到三种情况中的一种:中风训练、激进训练或控制。经过八周的训练,激进条件在听写和语义激进意识任务上比控制条件取得了更大的进步。研究结果强调了亲子联合写作对儿童中文语言和读写能力的潜在积极影响。研究结果还表明,父母通常在亲子联合写作中使用多种策略,不同的写作方法可能会以不同的方式促进识字知识的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Writing Systems Research
Writing Systems Research Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信