Relationship partners have shared scripts for conversations about the relationship: A replication and extension

L. Acitelli, R. Wickham, Julie A Brunson, Mai-Ly N. Steers
{"title":"Relationship partners have shared scripts for conversations about the relationship: A replication and extension","authors":"L. Acitelli, R. Wickham, Julie A Brunson, Mai-Ly N. Steers","doi":"10.1080/19424620.2015.1082011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The first experimental study of relationship talk (N = 42 couples) showed that when couples read stories about spouses who talked to each other about their relationships, such talk had different outcomes for the spouses, depending on the context and which partner was speaking. We replicated and improved upon this study in a number of ways (e.g. sample size and composition, new dependent variable, more standardized materials, more sophisticated and appropriate statistical techniques). Findings were almost identical to those of the earlier study including three-way interactions. Results (N = 238 couples) showed that when spouses talked about their relationship with each other, they were seen to have more positive outcomes, including closeness, than when they did not talk about their relationship. Further, relationship talk appeared to be especially positive in conflictive situations, but the effects of such talk were much weaker in pleasant situations. These findings were conceptualized as evidence of shared scripts for relationship conversations. Clinical implications are discussed.","PeriodicalId":89367,"journal":{"name":"Family science","volume":"6 1","pages":"108 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19424620.2015.1082011","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19424620.2015.1082011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The first experimental study of relationship talk (N = 42 couples) showed that when couples read stories about spouses who talked to each other about their relationships, such talk had different outcomes for the spouses, depending on the context and which partner was speaking. We replicated and improved upon this study in a number of ways (e.g. sample size and composition, new dependent variable, more standardized materials, more sophisticated and appropriate statistical techniques). Findings were almost identical to those of the earlier study including three-way interactions. Results (N = 238 couples) showed that when spouses talked about their relationship with each other, they were seen to have more positive outcomes, including closeness, than when they did not talk about their relationship. Further, relationship talk appeared to be especially positive in conflictive situations, but the effects of such talk were much weaker in pleasant situations. These findings were conceptualized as evidence of shared scripts for relationship conversations. Clinical implications are discussed.
关系伙伴分享了关于关系的对话脚本:复制和扩展
第一个关于关系谈话的实验研究(N = 42对夫妇)表明,当夫妇们阅读关于配偶彼此谈论他们的关系的故事时,这种谈话对配偶有不同的结果,这取决于语境和说话的一方。我们在许多方面复制和改进了这项研究(例如,样本量和组成,新的因变量,更标准化的材料,更复杂和适当的统计技术)。研究结果与之前的研究结果几乎相同,包括三方互动。结果(N = 238对夫妇)表明,当配偶谈论他们彼此的关系时,他们被认为比不谈论他们的关系时有更多的积极结果,包括亲密关系。此外,在冲突的情况下,关系谈话似乎特别积极,但在愉快的情况下,这种谈话的效果要弱得多。这些发现被概念化为关系对话共享脚本的证据。讨论了临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信