Can we have it all? The work–family coping profiles of dual-earners

M. Matias, A. Fontaine
{"title":"Can we have it all? The work–family coping profiles of dual-earners","authors":"M. Matias, A. Fontaine","doi":"10.1080/19424620.2012.723220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the difficulties faced, many dual-earner families seem to develop the necessary skills to deal with the challenge of managing family and work responsibilities. The present study uses a person-oriented approach to identify how four types of conciliation strategies – partner-based coping, having a positive view of the dual-earner situation, using individual management and planning skills and making professional adjustments – are combined and whether different combinations of these strategies are predictors of relationship satisfaction. Cluster analysis was conducted on a sample of 402 Portuguese dual-earners. Five profiles were found: Active, High Supported, Work Flexible, Low Supported and Minimalist. Actives report high use of all strategies, whereas Minimalists report the lowest use of all strategies. The High- and Low-Supported groups differ in the extent to which they use partner coping, whereas the Work-Flexible group use all strategies at a moderate to high level, especially making professional adjustments. The Active, High-Supported and Work-Flexible clusters were found to be more beneficial for relationship satisfaction. Women were more represented in the Active profile and men in the Work-Flexible profile, and this was partially shaped by gender attitudes: the more traditional women are, the more they are represented in the Work-Flexible cluster and less in the Active cluster. However, traditionalism is not a predictor of cluster membership for men. This study showed that individuals avoid cutting back on their work investments and make strong use of relationship-based strategies, in order to be able to combine work and family.","PeriodicalId":89367,"journal":{"name":"Family science","volume":"77 1","pages":"255 - 265"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19424620.2012.723220","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19424620.2012.723220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Despite the difficulties faced, many dual-earner families seem to develop the necessary skills to deal with the challenge of managing family and work responsibilities. The present study uses a person-oriented approach to identify how four types of conciliation strategies – partner-based coping, having a positive view of the dual-earner situation, using individual management and planning skills and making professional adjustments – are combined and whether different combinations of these strategies are predictors of relationship satisfaction. Cluster analysis was conducted on a sample of 402 Portuguese dual-earners. Five profiles were found: Active, High Supported, Work Flexible, Low Supported and Minimalist. Actives report high use of all strategies, whereas Minimalists report the lowest use of all strategies. The High- and Low-Supported groups differ in the extent to which they use partner coping, whereas the Work-Flexible group use all strategies at a moderate to high level, especially making professional adjustments. The Active, High-Supported and Work-Flexible clusters were found to be more beneficial for relationship satisfaction. Women were more represented in the Active profile and men in the Work-Flexible profile, and this was partially shaped by gender attitudes: the more traditional women are, the more they are represented in the Work-Flexible cluster and less in the Active cluster. However, traditionalism is not a predictor of cluster membership for men. This study showed that individuals avoid cutting back on their work investments and make strong use of relationship-based strategies, in order to be able to combine work and family.
我们能拥有一切吗?双职工的工作家庭应对概况
尽管面临种种困难,许多双职工家庭似乎已经掌握了处理家庭和工作责任挑战的必要技能。本研究采用以人为本的方法来确定如何将四种类型的调解策略——以伴侣为基础的应对、积极看待双职工的情况、使用个人管理和计划技能以及进行专业调整——结合起来,以及这些策略的不同组合是否能预测关系满意度。对402名葡萄牙双职工进行了聚类分析。有五种类型:活跃型、高支撑型、灵活工作型、低支撑型和极简型。积极主义者使用所有策略的频率都很高,而极简主义者使用所有策略的频率最低。高支持组和低支持组在使用伴侣应对的程度上有所不同,而灵活工作组则在中高水平上使用所有策略,特别是进行专业调整。积极、高支持和工作灵活的集群对关系满意度更有利。女性在“积极型”群体中所占比例更高,而男性在“灵活型”群体中所占比例更高,这在一定程度上是由性别态度决定的:越是传统的女性,在“灵活型”群体中所占比例就越高,而在“积极型”群体中所占比例就越低。然而,传统主义并不是男性群体成员的预测指标。这项研究表明,为了能够将工作和家庭结合起来,个人避免削减他们的工作投资,并充分利用基于关系的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信